A cascade synthesis of 2-aminothiochromones from 2-fluorophenyl ketone and thiocarbonyldiimidazole

  1. ‡,1 ,
  2. ‡,2 ,
  3. ‡,2 ,
  4. 3 ,
  5. 3 ,
  6. 1 ,
  7. 2,4 ORCID Logo ,
  8. 3 ,
  9. 2,4 and
  10. 2,5 ORCID Logo
1Key Laboratory of Structure-Based Drug Design & Discovery of Ministry of Education, School of Pharmaceutical Engineering, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang 110016, P. R. China
2Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100050, P. R. China
3Qingdao BAHEAL Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Qingdao 266200, P. R. China
  1. Corresponding author email
  2. ‡ Equal contributors
Associate Editor: B. Nay
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2026, 22, 1151–1159. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjoc.22.92
Received 01 Jun 2026, Accepted 31 Jul 2026, Published 12 Aug 2026
Full Research Paper
cc by logo

Abstract

A highly efficient cascade synthesis of various substituted 2-aminothiochromones was developed. The commercially available thiocarbonyldiimidazole (TCDI) acted as a key precursor in the construction of a sulfur-containing scaffold from 2-fluorophenyl ketone. Subsequent conjugated addition–elimination resulted in the corresponding 2-aminothiochromones under mild conditions. This simple protocol tolerates a broad range of functional groups and provides concise access to various 2-aminothiochromones in good to excellent yields (up to 94%).

Introduction

Sulfur-containing motifs are particularly important owing to their widespread applications and diverse biological activities [1]. As isosteric analogs of chromones [2], in which the oxygen atom is replaced by a sulfur atom, thiochromones are widely present in various natural products, functional materials, and biologically active molecules [3,4], such as MAO-B inhibitor [5], anticancer [6], antibacterial [7], and antimalarial compounds [8]. More interestingly, thiochromone analogues showed more potent activity than their oxygen-containing counterparts [9]. For example, some thiochromones demonstrate enhanced steroid sulfatase inhibitory activity compared to their chromone analogues, highlighting their potential as more potent bioactive agents [10]. Furthermore, oxidation of the sulfur atom in thiochromones yields sulfoxide or sulfone derivatives that also possess diverse biological activities [4]. Beyond pharmaceutical applications, thiochromones have also been widely used in materials science. For instance, they can serve as photolabile protecting groups [11] and a photoinduced fluorescence [12] and OLED exciton utilization efficiency improver [13]. Owing to their widespread applications, diverse biological activities, and utility as key building blocks in both pharmaceuticals and materials science, thiochromones have attracted considerable interest [14]. This has spurred the development of synthetic approaches and driven sustained investigations into their synthesis over recent decades.

Despite the structural similarity of the sulfur-containing thiochromone scaffold to the extensively developed chromones, synthetic methods for thiochromones remain very limited [2]. This disparity exists because, unlike the well-established synthesis of chromones, the construction of the thiochromone is hindered by several challenges. Compared to oxygen, the sulfur lone pair electrons exhibit a greater degree of delocalization into π-systems, which attenuates its inherent reactivity [1]. These electronic factors, combined with the limited availability of suitable substrates, present significant synthetic obstacles. Current synthetic approaches to thiochromones primarily involve two strategies: transition-metal-catalyzed reaction of aryl halides and cyclization of thiophenol derivatives. The transition-metal-catalyzed carbonylation reaction of aryl halides represents an attractive strategy for thiochromone synthesis due to its atom economy and straightforward construction of the essential carbonyl-containing framework [15-18]. Among these methods, the palladium-catalyzed multicomponent synthesis has been extensively studied. This reaction typically employs aryl halides and various alkynes as substrates, with sodium sulfide serving as the sulfur source (Scheme 1a) [19-21]. Another well-established method is the cyclization of thiophenol derivatives (Scheme 1b). A classic example is the condensation of substituted thiophenols with β-keto esters in the presence of polyphosphoric acid [22]. A gentle route was developed by Simon, which involved the reaction of thiosalicylic acids with 2-substituted N,N-dialkylacetamides in the presence of phosphorus oxychloride to afford 2-aminothiochromones [23]. Despite the wide application of the above approaches, the synthesis of 2-aminothiochromones often requires harsh conditions, such as high temperatures or strong acids [24,25].

[1860-5397-22-92-i1]

Scheme 1: Synthesis of thiochromones.

Although existing methods have enriched the synthesis of thiochromones, their narrow substrate scope and limited functional group compatibility hinder the efficient development of compound libraries for biological screening [26]. Driven by the interesting pharmacological potential of thiochromones, our group has a long-standing interest in their synthesis and bioactivity. In 2018, we reported a strategy for the construction of the 2-aminothiochromone scaffold with the aim of identifying antitubercular agents [27]. This approach involved the reaction of o-chloroacetophenone bearing an electron-withdrawing group with carbon disulfide to furnish the core scaffold, followed by amine introduction via nucleophilic aromatic substitution of the thioether in 2-position (Scheme 1c). We subsequently developed a more efficient protocol to access 2-aminothiochromones via a sulfoxide intermediate [28]. Then, we established a novel strategy for constructing 2-arylthiochromones using a combined Lewis acid and palladium(II) catalyst system [29]. As a part of our ongoing efforts to synthesize versatile thiochromones, this study was to establish a more economical and efficient synthetic route.

Recently, Imming and co-workers developed a method for preparing N,N-dialkylthioureas, which serve as key intermediates in benzothiazinone synthesis, using thiocarbonyldiimidazole (TCDI) as a sulfur source [30]. Inspired by these works and driven by our continued interest in thiochromone synthesis, we wondered whether it would be possible to combine thiochromone construction with amino functionalization in a cascade synthesis mode, wherein TCDI not only serves as a source of sulfur, but also provides an imidazole that acts as a reactive handle for further functionalization, thus maximizing atomic economy. Herein, we disclose a cascade synthesis of 2-aminothiochromone with a highly flexible substitution pattern.

Results and Discussion

Initially, we selected 3-(2-fluorophenyl)-3-oxopropanenitrile (1a), morpholine (2a), and TCDI as model substrates to explore the feasibility of our hypothesis, since fluorine is the preferred leaving group in nucleophilic aromatic substitution (SNAr) reactions (Table 1). In the absence of a base, the substrate 1a remained unchanged when refluxed in dichloromethane (DCM). The addition of triethylamine (Et₃N) led to only a trace amount of product. Switching the solvent to tetrahydrofuran (THF) significantly increased the yield to 56%, suggesting that both a base and a higher reaction temperature are necessary for the scaffold construction. Employing acetonitrile (MeCN), with a higher boiling point, shortened the reaction time while maintaining a comparable yield. Carrying out the reaction in dimethylformamide (DMF) at 100 °C proved optimal, delivering product 3a in 78% yield. Keeping DMF as the optimal solvent, subsequent base screening revealed that the yield was maintained when Et3N was replaced by N,N-diisopropylethylamine (DIPEA). In contrast, the use of 1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene (DBU) or potassium tert-butoxide failed to obtain 3a, and potassium carbonate diminished the yield by almost half. The current results indicated that Et₃N was the optimal base for this reaction. Finally, we found that reducing the amount of TCDI to 1.3 equivalents under the optimal Et3N/DMF conditions retained a high yield, thus establishing the standard conditions for the subsequent amine scope investigation.

Table 1: Optimization of reaction conditions.a

[Graphic 1]
Entry Base Solvent Time (h) T (°C) Yield (%)b
1 DCM 5 40 0
2 Et3N DCM 5 40 trace
3 Et3N THF 5 70 56
4 Et3N MeCN 2 80 56
5 Et3N DMF 1 100 78
6 DIPEA DMF 1 100 75
7 DBU DMF 2 100 0
8 t-BuOK DMF 1 100 0
9 K2CO3 DMF 1 100 37
10c Et3N DMF 1 100 73

aStandard conditions: 1) 1a (1.0 mmol, 1.0 equiv), base (3.0 mmol, 3.0 equiv), TCDI (1.5 mmol, 1.5 equiv), solvent (3 mL), reflux; 2) 2a (2.0 mmol, 2.0 equiv), rt, 1 h. bYields refer to isolated compounds after column chromatography. cTCDI (1.3 mmol, 1.3 equiv).

With the optimal conditions established, the scope of the amine was investigated to diversify the range of substituents for the exploration of different potential bioactivity profiles. Following the initial optimization using the secondary amine morpholine as the substrate, we evaluated the generality of the optimized conditions by testing a range of different amines. Moreover, the workup procedure was simplified, yielding the target product in good purity without the need of column chromatography. As shown in Scheme 2, the reaction demonstrated a broad amine substrate scope, providing the desired products in moderate to high yields. After having examined morpholine which readily afforded the desired product 3a, next n-butylamine and cyclohexylmethylamine were selected to evaluate the compatibility of the conditions with primary amines. The corresponding products 3b and 3c were obtained in good yields (81% and 84%, respectively), indicating that the presence of a free N–H bond does not impede the reaction. Then, we explored aromatic amines and investigated the effect of substituents on the aromatic ring. Anilines bearing either electron-donating (4-Me, 4-MeO) or electron-withdrawing groups (4-Cl, 4-Br) effectively afforded the products 3dh in 64% to 83% yield. The results revealed that the electronic properties of the substituents on the aniline ring have little influence on the yields. In addition, benzylamine was also compatible with the optimized conditions, providing product 3i in 76% yield. Taken together, it is inferred that the reaction efficiency does not strongly correlate with the nucleophilicity of the amine substrates. Subsequently, the scope of substrate 1 was extended to derivatives bearing various substituents on the benzene ring. Electron-donating groups were well tolerated, affording products 3jr in good to high yields (70–82%). In contrast, substrates bearing additional electron-withdrawing groups on the benzene ring (3su) generally gave lower yields (45–62%). Moreover, protic and unsaturated moieties, including hydroxy (3v, 61%) and alkynyl (3w, 68%) groups, were well tolerated under the optimized conditions. Furthermore, the reaction exhibited a preference for the functionalization of aliphatic amines over aromatic ones, as exemplified by the excellent chemoselectivity of product 3x. The above results demonstrate the broad applicability of the method.

[1860-5397-22-92-i2]

Scheme 2: Scope of various amines and substrate 1. Standard conditions: 1) 1 (1.0 mmol, 1.0 equiv), Et3N (3.0 mmol, 3.0 equiv), TCDI (1.3 mmol, 1.3 equiv), DMF (3 mL), 100 °C, 1 h; 2) 2 (2.0 mmol, 2.0 equiv), rt, 1 h. The products were obtained after aqueous washing and filtration. aYields refer to isolated products after column chromatography.

The reaction is proposed to be initiated by the generation of a carbanion from the activated methylene group. To validate the effect of initial carbanion generation, dicarbonyl analogs 4, in which the cyano group was replaced by a methyl ester, were selected as substrates. The results indicate that the methylene group of these dicarbonyl compounds is also capable of forming a carbanion under the established conditions. As shown in Scheme 3, the substituted methyl 3-(2-fluorophenyl)-3-oxopropanoates 4 underwent the same reaction process as the cyanide-based compounds 1 to construct the thiochromone scaffolds. Indeed, thiochromones 5a–j bearing electron-withdrawing groups on the benzene ring were obtained in good to excellent yields (40–94%). In contrast, substrates with unsubstituted or benzene rings bearing electron-donating substituents gave substantially lower yields (5k–o, 27–59%). This trend is consistent with an intramolecular nucleophilic aromatic substitution process favored by electron-withdrawing substituents. This limitation, however, could be addressed by exploiting the cyanide group presented in series 3 compounds for further derivatization.

[1860-5397-22-92-i3]

Scheme 3: Synthesis of thiochromones from dicarbonyl analogs 4. Standard conditions: 1) 4 (1.0 mmol, 1.0 equiv), Et3N (3.0 mmol, 3.0 equiv), TCDI (1.3 mmol, 1.3 equiv), DMF (3 mL), 100 °C, 1 h; 2) 2 (2.0 mmol, 2.0 equiv), rt, 1 h; the products were obtained after aqueous washing and filtration. aYields refer to isolated product after column chromatography.

Based on the experimental results, we propose a plausible mechanism for forming the thiochromone scaffold (Scheme 4). The reaction is initiated by a base-assisted deprotonation of substrate 1a to generate carbanion 1a’. Next, an intermolecular nucleophilic attack of carbanion 1a’ on the thiocarbonyl group of TCDI (1a’’) with displacing one molecule of imidazole forms intermediate A, which was detected by mass spectrometry. However, intermediate A is unstable and rapidly cyclizes during work-up or purification. This process proceeds via a second deprotonation to generate a thiolate anion (A’), which subsequently engages in an intramolecular nucleophilic aromatic substitution with the fluorine on the benzene ring, to build the cyclized thiochromone core. Finally, the target 2-aminothiochromone 3a is obtained through a nucleophilic addition–elimination reaction, where the amine adds to intermediate B, leading to the expulsion of the second imidazole molecule (B’). Notably, the key intermediate B was isolated from the reaction mixture, while intermediate A was characterized by mass spectrometry during the reaction. Collectively, these results indicate that the initial generation of a carbanion is the key step in this reaction.

[1860-5397-22-92-i4]

Scheme 4: Plausible mechanism.

To evaluate the application prospects of the cascade reaction, the cyano group or methyl ester was functionalized under different conditions (Scheme 5). For instance, hydrolysis of the cyano group in compound 3a under mild conditions afforded the corresponding amide 6. Under more violent conditions, such as concentrated sulfuric acid, the cyano group underwent concomitant hydrolysis and decarboxylation to yield compound 7. Alternatively, basic hydrolysis of the methyl ester in compound 5k provided the carboxylic acid 8, which allows for further structural diversification. Together, these transformations highlight the high post-functionalization potential of the present method.

[1860-5397-22-92-i5]

Scheme 5: Extended applications.

Conclusion

In summary, we have developed an efficient, cascade synthesis of 2-aminothiochromones from commercially available starting material TCDI. These reactions proceed under mild conditions, tolerate various functional groups, and generally afford the desired products in good to excellent yields. Notably, TCDI has been proved to be uniquely suited for this process as a multifunctional reagent. It serves not only as the sulfur source for thiochromone construction but also as a reactive handle for the subsequent introduction of diverse amine nucleophiles, yielding a variety of 2-aminothiochromones with high efficiency. Furthermore, the presence of the cyano and methyl ester group offers a versatile structural elaboration, thereby providing a flexible platform for the construction of compound libraries with structural diversity. The biological activity and potential applications of these thiochromone derivatives are currently under investigation.

Experimental

General information

Chemicals and solvents were purchased from commercial sources and were used as received. TLC was performed on silica gel plates (GF254) with visualization of components by UV light (254 nm). Column chromatography was carried out on silica gel (200–300 mesh). All melting points were measured using a melting point apparatus (MP470, Yanaco), and the temperatures were uncorrected. The structural characterizations of the prepared compounds were performed by 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectroscopy and high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS). 1H NMR spectra were obtained on an ECZ-400 spectrometer (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) at 400 MHz and a Bruker AVANCE 500 (Bruker, Rheinstetten, Germany) at 500 MHz. 13C NMR spectra were obtained on a Bruker 400 (Bruker, Rheinstetten, Germany) at 100 MHz and a Bruker AVANCE 500 (Bruker, Rheinstetten, Germany) at 125 MHz. Chemical shift values were referenced to the residual solvent peak and reported in ppm (δ scale) and all coupling constant (J) values were given in Hz. CDCl3 or DMSO‑d6 was used as the standard NMR solvent. The following multiplicity abbreviations were used: (s) singlet, (d) doublet, (t) triplet, (q) quartet, (m) multiplet and (brs) broad singlet. HRESIMS data were measured on a Thermo Exactive Orbitrap plus spectrometer. If necessary, the target compounds were purified by chromatography with a purity of >95% as determined by UPLC analysis conducted on a Waters ACQUITY UPLC H-Class and ACQUITY QDa system, using a reversed-phase C18 column (ACQUITY UPLC BEH C18 1.7 μm, 2.1 mm × 100 mm) with a gradient of 5–95% CH3CN in water (0.1% HCOOH) in 10 min at a flow rate of 0.3 mL min−1.

General procedure for the synthesis of thiochromones

To a solution of compound 1 or 4 (1.00 mmol, 1.0 equiv) in N,N-dimethylformamide (3 mL) was added 1,1'-thiocarbonyldiimidazole (1.30 mmol, 1.3 equiv) followed by triethylamine (3.00 mmol, 3.0 equiv). The mixture was heated at 100 °C for 1 h. After cooling to ambient temperature, compound 2 (2.00 mmol, 2.0 equiv) was added and the reaction mixture was stirred for 1 h at room temperature. Upon completion, the mixture was quenched with water (40 mL). The resulting precipitate was isolated by filtration, washed with water (20 mL), and dried under vacuum to yield the title compound in pure form.

Supporting Information

Supporting Information File 1: Experimental, characterization data and copies of spectra.
Format: PDF Size: 7.1 MB Download

Funding

The research was supported by the Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation (L252194), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82373711) and the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (2023-I2M-2-001).

Data Availability Statement

All data that supports the findings of this study is available in the published article and/or the supporting information of this article.

References

  1. Mustafa, M.; Winum, J.-Y. Expert Opin. Drug Discovery 2022, 17, 501–512. doi:10.1080/17460441.2022.2044783
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  2. Sosnovskikh, V. Y. Chem. Heterocycl. Compd. 2016, 52, 427–440. doi:10.1007/s10593-016-1906-7
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  3. Zhao, S.; Zhu, P.; Xu, B.; Ling, S.; Zhang, L.; Sun, F.-G. J. Org. Chem. 2023, 88, 9283–9292. doi:10.1021/acs.joc.3c00842
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  4. Dong, J.; Zhang, Q.; Meng, Q.; Wang, Z.; Li, S.; Cui, J. Mini-Rev. Med. Chem. 2018, 18, 1714–1732. doi:10.2174/1389557518666180515145633
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  5. Mi, P.; Tan, Y.; Ye, S.; Lang, J.-J.; Lv, Y.; Jiang, J.; Chen, L.; Luo, J.; Lin, Y.; Yuan, Z.; Zheng, X.; Lin, Y.-W. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2024, 263, 115956. doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2023.115956
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  6. Marć, M. A.; Kincses, A.; Rácz, B.; Nasim, M. J.; Sarfraz, M.; Lázaro-Milla, C.; Domínguez-Álvarez, E.; Jacob, C.; Spengler, G.; Almendros, P. Pharmaceuticals 2020, 13, 453. doi:10.3390/ph13120453
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  7. Nakazumi, H.; Ueyama, T.; Kitao, T. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 1984, 21, 193–196. doi:10.1002/jhet.5570210138
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  8. Charris, J.; Domínguez, J.; Lobo, G.; Riggione, F. Pharm. Pharmacol. Commun. 1999, 5, 107–110. doi:10.1211/146080899128734541
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  9. Dey, S.; Kumar, B. K.; Johri, S.; Faheem; Murugesan, S. Struct. Chem. 2022, 33, 2063–2082. doi:10.1007/s11224-022-01974-4
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  10. Nussbaumer, P.; Lehr, P.; Billich, A. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 4310–4320. doi:10.1021/jm020878w
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  11. Kitani, S.; Sugawara, K.; Tsutsumi, K.; Morimoto, T.; Kakiuchi, K. Chem. Commun. 2008, 2103–2105. doi:10.1039/b801860j
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  12. Chudov, K. A.; Levchenko, K. S.; Barachevskii, V. A.; Valova, T. M.; Grebennikov, E. P.; Shmelin, P. S.; Poroshin, N. O.; Adamov, G. E.; Yarovenko, V. N.; Krayushkin, M. M. Mendeleev Commun. 2016, 26, 521–523. doi:10.1016/j.mencom.2016.11.021
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  13. Liu, J.; Hu, T.; Li, Z.; Wei, X.; Hu, X.; Gao, H.; Liu, G.; Yi, Y.; Yamada-Takamura, Y.; Lee, C.-S.; Wang, P.; Wang, Y. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2019, 10, 1888–1893. doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b00512
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  14. Murugappan, S.; Kuthe, P. V.; Chandra Sekhar, K. V. G.; Sankaranarayanan, M. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2024, 22, 6045–6079. doi:10.1039/d4ob00690a
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  15. Wu, X.-F.; Neumann, H.; Beller, M. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 4986–5009. doi:10.1039/c1cs15109f
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  16. Wang, W.; Bao, Z.-P.; Qi, X.; Wu, X.-F. Org. Lett. 2021, 23, 6589–6593. doi:10.1021/acs.orglett.1c02442
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  17. Mi, P.; He, L.; Shen, T.; Sun, J. Z.; Zhao, H. Org. Lett. 2019, 21, 6280–6284. doi:10.1021/acs.orglett.9b02161
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  18. Zhu, F.; Wu, X.-F. J. Org. Chem. 2018, 83, 13612–13617. doi:10.1021/acs.joc.8b02294
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  19. Willy, B.; Frank, W.; Müller, T. J. J. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2010, 8, 90–95. doi:10.1039/b917627f
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  20. Palani, T.; Park, K.; Song, K. H.; Lee, S. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2013, 355, 1160–1168. doi:10.1002/adsc.201201106
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  21. Shen, C.; Spannenberg, A.; Wu, X.-F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 5067–5070. doi:10.1002/anie.201600953
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  22. Wang, H.-K.; Bastow, K. F.; Cosentino, L. M.; Lee, K.-H. J. Med. Chem. 1996, 39, 1975–1980. doi:10.1021/jm960008c
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  23. Liepa, A. J.; Nguyen, O.; Saubern, S. Aust. J. Chem. 2005, 58, 864–869. doi:10.1071/ch05205
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  24. Lau, C. K.; Belanger, P. C.; Dufresne, C.; Scheigetz, J. J. Org. Chem. 1987, 52, 1670–1673. doi:10.1021/jo00385a005
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  25. Zhmurenko, L. A.; Glozman, O. M.; Zagorevskii, V. A. Chem. Heterocycl. Compd. 1978, 14, 141–144. doi:10.1007/bf00945325
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  26. Bondock, S.; Metwally, M. A. J. Sulfur Chem. 2008, 29, 623–653. doi:10.1080/17415990802382882
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  27. Li, P.; Wang, B.; Zhang, X.; Batt, S. M.; Besra, G. S.; Zhang, T.; Ma, C.; Zhang, D.; Lin, Z.; Li, G.; Huang, H.; Lu, Y. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 160, 157–170. doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2018.09.042
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  28. Li, P.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, T.; Ma, C.; Lin, Z.; Li, G.; Huang, H. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2019, 15, 703–709. doi:10.3762/bjoc.15.65
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  29. Li, P.; Li, S.; Li, G.; Huang, H. ACS Omega 2021, 6, 14655–14663. doi:10.1021/acsomega.1c01778
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  30. Richter, A.; Narula, G.; Rudolph, I.; Seidel, R. W.; Wagner, C.; Av‐Gay, Y.; Imming, P. ChemMedChem 2022, 17, e202100733. doi:10.1002/cmdc.202100733
    Return to citation in text: [1]
Other Beilstein-Institut Open Science Activities