9 article(s) from Huth, Michael
Figure 1: Block-flow diagram of the environment of the pattern generator program using input from a geometry ...
Figure 2: Illustration of the three dimensional pitch Π3D, projected in the x–z-plane: In every frame each ac...
Figure 3: Visualization of the height-dependent deposition rate: The blue circles correspond to vertices defi...
Figure 4: Schematic overview of the angle-sorted proximity avoiding algorithm (asPAA). a: In order to minimiz...
Figure 5: Schematic overview of the best permutation proximity avoiding algorithm (bpPAA). The algorithm gene...
Figure 6: Calibration of deposition speed parameters xF und zF. Shown is one deposition series from 52° tilte...
Figure 7: Angle-test structure consisting of several elements. Each element has a vertical pillar and a tilte...
Figure 8: Avoiding of proximity effects: A and B are 2 × 2 arrays of cubes resting on a short pillar. They ar...
Figure 9: Comparison of the angle-sorted proximity avoiding algorithm (asPAA) and the best permutation PAA (b...
Figure 10: Height correction: Both left images are taken from a 52° tilted view. (A) is deposited without heig...
Figure 11: Array of trees, each consisting of a root and three branches. The roots of the trees of the second ...
Figure 12: Buckyball structure in top and side view (52° tilted). Precursor: Me3CpMePt(IV), normal mode.
Figure 13: 2 × 2 array of nanotrees consisting of a root and branches deposited with the CoFe precursor and a ...
Figure 14: Working principle of the simple shadowing algorithm. A plane is defined parallel to the opening of ...
Figure 15: In order to investigate the shape of edge tips with different edge inclination, deposits like shown...
Figure 1: Structural arrangement of HFeCo3(CO)12 and H2FeRu3(CO)13 illustrating differences in symmetry and l...
Figure 2: Isotope distribution of a) HFeCo3(CO)12 and b) H2FeRu3(CO)13. Isotope distribution for both compoun...
Figure 3: Negative ion yield curves for the formation of a) [Fe(CO)n]− and b) [Ru(CO)n]− up on electron attac...
Figure 4: Loss of Fe(CO)2 (panel a), Fe(CO)3 (panel b), Fe(CO)4 (panel c) and additional loss of up to 7 COs ...
Figure 5: Negative ions formed through loss of Ru(CO)3 (panel a), Ru(CO)4 (panel b) and further loss of up to...
Figure 6: Calculated spin density of the [H2FeRu3(CO)13]− anion; a) in the constrained geometry of neutral H2...
Figure 7: Calculated MO diagrams of H2FeRu3(CO)13 and HFeCo3(CO)12. Red lines represent the unoccupied molecu...
Figure 8: Electron impact ionization spectra of H2FeRu3(CO)13 recorded at electron energy of 70 eV, upper pan...
Figure 9: Evolution of O 1s, Fe 2p and Ru 3d/C 1s XPS regions of a H2FeRu3(CO)13 film exposed to electron dos...
Figure 10: Change in fractional coverage of oxygen atoms (red stars) and, Ru 3d5/2 peak position (blue open ci...
Figure 11: Mass spectrum of neutral gas phase species desorbed from an H2FeRu3(CO)13 film during the course of...
Figure 12: Changes in O 1s, Fe 2p and Ru 3d/C 1s XPS regions when an H2FeRu3(CO)13 film was exposed to electro...
Figure 13: Initial decomposition/deposition of surface adsorbed H2FeRu3(CO)13 precursor, mediated by dissociat...
Figure 14: Schematic showing the incorporation of partially decarbonylated intermediate of H2FeRu3(CO)13 into ...
Figure 15: (a) AFM cross sections of deposits shown in the SEM micrograph (b) at the positions indicated by th...
Figure 16: Transport measurements of as-grown Fe–Ru deposit and deposits grown under identical conditions afte...
Figure 1: Preparation and post-processing of the samples investigated in this work. Throughout the text the s...
Figure 2: SEM images of the samples. The 500 × 860 nm2 insets show the morphology of the post-processed Co/Pt...
Figure 3: Time-dependent conductance of the Pt layer of sample C normalized to its saturation value after the...
Figure 4: Hall voltage cycling at 10 K for all samples. Before measurements, all samples were saturated at 3 ...
Figure 5: TEM micrographs of sample C acquired (a) in the high angle annular dark field mode and (b) in the a...
Figure 6: (a) Cross-sectional and (b) lower layer in-plane EDX elemental peak intensities for sample C acquir...
Figure 7: The location of the probed layers is shown in panel (a). Nano-diffractograms of the upper (b) and t...
Figure 8: Isothermal Hall voltage cycling for sample D at a series of temperatures, as indicated. Insets: Tem...
Figure 1: Schematic representation of the optimization process: (a) Layer structure of FEBID deposits: m opti...
Figure 2: Flow chart of the in situ optimization of conductance of FEBID deposits with a GA. After the initia...
Figure 3: (a) Rate of change of conductance during the GA optimization for the W–C–O reference (green), GA-op...
Figure 4: (a) Chemical composition of sample 1 (tD = 100 μs), sample 2 (tD = 0.5 μs) and sample 3 (tD = 831 μ...
Figure 5: Time-dependent rate of change of conductance for Pt–C deposits - The GA is applied for the optimiza...
Figure 1: Illustration of FEBID. Precursor molecules (here: organometallic complex; blue: metal, green: organ...
Figure 2: Single-species growth rate calculated for the precursor Me3Pt(IV)CpMe assuming three different elec...
Figure 3: Molecular models of octanol (left) and Co2(CO)8 (right). Rendered using Jmol.
Figure 4: Simulation of concentration of different elements in FEBID structure under parallel use of Co2(CO)8...
Figure 5: Molecular models of Si5H12 (left) and Me3Pt(IV)CpMe (right). Rendered using Jmol.
Figure 6: Elemental composition of various Pt–Si deposits as determined by EDX according to [28]. The data were t...
Figure 7: Dependence of the room temperature resistivity on the Si/Pt ratio in the FEBID samples according to ...
Figure 8: Temperature-dependent conductivity of the Pt–Si FEBID samples represented as ln σ vs T−a to facilit...
Figure 9: TEM electron diffraction pattern of samples on carbon membrane before (left) and after (right) post...
Figure 10: Temperature-dependent conductivity and Hall effect as a function of the applied magnetic field for ...
Figure 11: Dependence of the yield ratio for the precursors Co2(CO)8 and Me3Pt(IV)CpMe on the dwell time withi...
Figure 12: Phase diagram of the transport regimes of granular metals. In the insulating regime for g < gc ther...
Figure 13: Temperature-dependent conductivity of Pt–C FEBID structures that have been exposed to different pos...
Figure 14: Temperature-dependent conductivity of Pt–C FEBID structures that have been exposed to different pos...
Figure 15: Calculated gauge factor κ as a function of intergrain coupling strength (bottom axis) and metal vol...
Figure 16: Left: Strain-resistance effect of a Pt–C nanogranular sensor element measured on a test cantilever ...
Figure 1: (a) Optical micrograph of the Co dissociation product on the plasma-activated silica surface. The d...
Figure 2: SEM images of Co deposited on the plasma-pretreated silicon oxide and gold. The picture on the top ...
Figure 3: (a) SEM micrograph of Co deposit formed after electron pre-irradiation of the rectangular area depi...
Figure 4: (a) Temperature dependence of resistivity of Co deposit grown on the plasma-activated SiO2 surfaces...
Figure 5: (a) Top and (b) side view of DFT optimized structure of Co2(CO)8 and its frontier orbitals (c) HOMO...
Figure 6: Schematic representation of the starting configurations with possible Co2(CO)8 orientations, consid...
Figure 7: (a) Most stable structure of Co2(CO)8 on the (a) FOH-SiO2 and (b) POH-SiO2 surfaces. The molecule d...
Figure 8: Band decomposed charge density for the valence band maximum for Co2(CO)8 on the (a) FOH-SiO2 and (b...
Figure 1: SEM images of NWs grown on gold-sputtered Si[111] exposed to NPS vapor at 375 °C for 1 h (left: sid...
Figure 2: Analysis of NWs grown on gold-sputtered Si[111] for 1 h at 375 °C. Top left: Backscattered-electron...
Figure 3: TEM images of NWs grown on gold-sputtered Si[111] for 1 h at 375 °C. The FFT of the HRTEM image and...
Figure 4: SEM images of NWs grown on gold-sputtered Si[111] by exposure to NPS vapor for 1 h at 650 °C.
Figure 5: SEM image of gold nanoparticles formed on the native oxide surface of Si[111] after annealing of Au...
Figure 6: SEM image of NWs grown at 650 °C for 1 h on Si[111] surfaces with annealed gold films (left: sample...
Figure 7: SEM image of NWs grown at 375 °C for 1 h, on annealed gold films of different sputtering times (lef...
Figure 8: SEM image of the chemisorbed gold nanoparticles on the aminopropylated Si[111] surface.
Figure 9: SEM image of NWs grown from nanoparticles at 650 °C without prior treatment (left) and at 375 °C af...
Figure 10: SEM images with different magnifications of a spin coated film of “liquid bright gold” on Si[111] a...
Figure 11: SEM image of Si NWs obtained from spin-coated “liquid bright gold” films after annealing at 650 °C,...
Figure 12: Optical microscopy images of the different steps of the irradiation-induced pattern formation. Left...
Figure 13: SEM images (different magnifications) of Si NWs obtained from UV-patterned spin-coated “liquid brig...
Figure 14: SEM image of the border region of a Si NW pattern obtained from UV-patterned “liquid bright gold” f...