Logo Beilstein Institut

Dimethylamine as the key intermediate generated in situ from dimethylformamide (DMF) for the synthesis of thioamides

  1. 1 ,
  2. 1 and
  3. 2
1College of Chemical Engineering, Guangdong University of Petrochemical Technology, 2 Guandu Road, Maoming 525000, P. R. China, Fax: +86-668-2923575; Tel: +86-668-2923956
2College Analytical and Testing Centre, Beijing Normal University, No. 19, Xinjiekouwai St., Haidian District, Beijing 100875, P. R. China; Tel: +86-15010928428
  1. Corresponding author email
Associate Editor: B. Stoltz
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2015, 11, 1721–1726. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjoc.11.187
Received 17 May 2015, Accepted 04 Sep 2015, Published 23 Sep 2015
Full Research Paper
cc by logo
PDF
Album
Supp Info
Cite

Abstract

An improved and efficient method for the synthesis of thioamides is presented. For this transformation, dimethylamine as the key intermediate is generated in situ from dimethylformamide (DMF). All the tested substrates produced the desired products with excellent isolated yields.

Keywords: aldehydes; dimethylformamide (DMF); elemental sulfur; ketones; thioamides

Introduction

Thioamides, a well-known structural element of many sulfur-containing molecules, synthetic agents [1,2], heterocycles, natural products and pharmaceuticals [3-8], have attracted considerable attention for their construction and use in organic synthesis [9,10]. Many compounds containing a thioamide motif are of medicinal significance and exhibit potent biological activities. These include for example opioid activity [11], immunosuppressive activity and DHODH inhibitory properties [12], activity against parasitic nematodes [13], and antituberculotic activity [14].

Consequently, a number of synthetic methods for the construction of this important unit have been established over the past decades [15-21]. However, some of these methods have limited applications, because of harsh conditions, low yields or the need of noble-metal catalysts. Therefore the development of novel and efficient methods for the construction of the thioamide motif is highly desirable. To avoid the disadvantages of the traditional methods, our group has developed an improved synthetic procedure to construct thioamides (Scheme 1).

[1860-5397-11-187-i1]

Scheme 1: Synthesis of thioamide derivatives.

Results and Discussion

Our initial efforts focused on the optimization of the reaction conditions by employing 4-methoxybenzaldehyde (1a) as a model reactant to interact with elemental sulfur and DMF (Table 1). The reaction is completed after 4 h at 120 °C, providing 4-methoxy-N,N-dimethylbenzothioamide (2a) with 64% yield by using sodium acetate (AcONa) as the base (Table 1, entry 2). With regard to the catalytic activity of different bases (Table 1, entries 4–8), 1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene (DBU) showed the highest activity and afforded the desired product with 96% yield (Table 1, entry 7). It is worth mentioning that this conversion does not take place in the absence of a base (Table 1, entry 9). Lowering the temperature from 120 °C to 100 °C decreased the yield considerably (Table 1, entry 10). When the reaction was performed at room temperature no product was obtained at all (Table 1, entry 11).

Table 1: Optimization studies.a

[Graphic 1]
Entry Temp. ( °C) Base (0.2 equiv) Time (h) Yield (%)b
1 120 AcONa 3 57
2 120 AcONa 4 64
3 120 AcONa 5 64
4 120 Na2CO3 4 25
5 120 KOH 4 15
6 120 DABCO 4 21
7 120 DBU 4 96
8 120 EtONa 4 17
9 120 none 4 none
10 100 DBU 4 79
11 rt DBU 4 none

aReaction conditions: 1a (0.25 mmol), S8 (1.2 equiv, based on 1/8 S8), DMF (2.0 mL); bGC yield.

Once the optimal conditions had been identified (Table 1, entry 7), next the scope of the reaction was investigated. Sixteen substrates including 12 substituted aldehydes and 4 ketones were screened and the results are presented in Table 2. As can be seen from the Table, all reactions proceeded smoothly and gave the corresponding thioamides 2a–p exclusively in good to excellent isolated yields. It was also found that unsubstituted, mono-, di- and trisubstituted substrates regardless of the position (o-, m-, or p-) and the electronic properties of the substituents (electron-donating or –withdrawing) on the benzene ring were all compatible with the standard conditions. For example, methoxy-, o-, m-, and p-methyl-, fluoro-, chloro-, or hydroxy-substituted aromatic aldehydes and ketones were all converted to their corresponding thioamides with excellent isolated yields. Finally, some aliphatic aldehydes such as phenylacetaldehyde (Table 2, entry 9), butyraldehyde (Table 2, entry 15) and pentanal (Table 2, entry 16) were subjected to the reaction. They were also found compatible with the standard conditions, and the corresponding products were isolated in moderate to good yields.

Table 2: Scope of the reaction.a

[Graphic 2]
Entry Educt 1a–p Product 2a–p Yield (%)b
1 [Graphic 3]
1a 		[Graphic 4]
2a 		90 (88)
2 [Graphic 5]
1b 		[Graphic 6]
2b 		84
3 [Graphic 7]
1c 		[Graphic 8]
2c 		82
4 [Graphic 9]
1d 		[Graphic 10]
2d 		82
5 [Graphic 11]
1e 		[Graphic 12]
2e 		83
6 [Graphic 13]
1f 		[Graphic 14]
2f 		80
7 [Graphic 15]
1g 		[Graphic 16]
2g 		80
8 [Graphic 17]
1h 		[Graphic 18]
2h 		89
9 [Graphic 19]
1i 		[Graphic 20]
2i 		83
10 [Graphic 21]
1j 		[Graphic 22]
2j 		88
11 [Graphic 23]
1k 		[Graphic 24]
2k 		80
12 [Graphic 25]
1l 		[Graphic 26]
2l 		84
13 [Graphic 27]
1m 		[Graphic 28]
2i 		77
14 [Graphic 29]
1n 		[Graphic 30]
2n 		79
15 [Graphic 31]
1o 		[Graphic 32]
2o 		63
16 [Graphic 33]
1p 		[Graphic 34]
2p 		67

aReaction conditions: 1 (1.0 mmol), S8 (1.2 equiv, based on 1/8 S8); bisolated yield. Number in parentheses is the isolated yield of 1 (10.0 mmol scale) after purification by column chromatography.

In order to expand the scope and to get insight into the reaction mechanism of this protocol, three control experiments were conducted (Scheme 2). In the first two experiments the reaction was performed with N,N-dimethylacetamide (DMA) and N,N-dimethylacrylamide instead of DMF under the standard conditions. In both cases no product formation was observed, suggesting that neither DMA nor N,N-dimethylacrylamide is able to promote the reaction. However, repeating the reaction in DMA in the presence of N,N-dimethylamine the desired product 2a was obtained in 98% yield. These results are proving the involvement of dimethylamine in this transformation and that it is in situ generated from N,N-dimethylformamide under the reaction conditions.

[1860-5397-11-187-i2]

Scheme 2: Control experiments.

Based on the above experiments and the existing literature [22-24], a suggested mechanism is outlined in Scheme 3. The reaction starts with a base-induced cleavage of DMF to form the required dimethylamine according to the mechanism suggested by Van der Eycken, Hallberg and co-workers [25,26]. The subsequent step involves the classical Willgerodt–Kindler reaction as described by Amupitan and Darabi [27,28].

[1860-5397-11-187-i3]

Scheme 3: A mechanistic rationale for the synthesis of thioamides.

Conclusion

In summary, an improved synthetic procedure for the synthesis of thioamides has been established. This protocol is applicable to a wide range of aldehydes and ketones yielding the thioamides with excellent isolated yields. For this transformation, DMF works not only as the solvent but also as the source of dimethylamine. The present method is more practical compared to the traditional strategies and complements the classical methods for the rapid construction of thioamides.

Supporting Information

Supporting Information File 1: Full experimental details and copies of NMR spectra.
Format: PDF Size: 512.4 KB Download

Acknowledgements

We thank the Excellent Young Scientist Fund of Guangdong Province Education Department (No.2013LYM_0059) for financial support.

References

  1. Goldberg, J. M.; Speight, L. C.; Fegley, M. W.; Petersson, E. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 6088–6091. doi:10.1021/ja3005094
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  2. Liu, C. T.; Maxwell, C. I.; Pipe, S. G.; Neverov, A. A.; Mosey, N. J.; Brown, R. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 20068–20071. doi:10.1021/ja209605r
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  3. Batjargal, S.; Wang, Y. J.; Goldberg, J. M.; Wissner, R. F.; Petersson, E. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 9172–9182. doi:10.1021/ja2113245
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  4. Murai, T.; Hori, F.; Maruyama, T. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 1718–1721. doi:10.1021/ol200231z
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  5. Suzuki, Y.; Iwata, M.; Yazaki, R.; Kumagai, N.; Shibasaki, M. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77, 4496–4500. doi:10.1021/jo300566p
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  6. Okano, A.; James, R. C.; Pierce, J. G.; Xie, J.; Boger, D. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 8790–8793. doi:10.1021/ja302808p
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  7. Beattie, D. E.; Crossley, R.; Curran, A. C. W.; Dixon, G. T.; Hill, D. G.; Lawrence, A. E.; Shepherd, R. G. J. Med. Chem. 1977, 20, 714–718. doi:10.1021/jm00215a019
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  8. Zacharie, B.; Lagraoui, M.; Dimarco, M.; Penney, C. L.; Gagnon, L. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 2046–2052. doi:10.1021/jm9900467
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  9. Goldberg, J. M.; Chen, X.; Meinhardt, N.; Greenbaum, D. C.; Petersson, E. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 2086–2093. doi:10.1021/ja412297x
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  10. Goldberg, J. M.; Batjargal, S.; Chen, B. S.; Petersson, E. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 18651–18658. doi:10.1021/ja409709x
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  11. Sherman, D. B.; Spatola, A. F.; Wire, W. S.; Burks, T. F.; Nguyen, T. M.-D.; Schiller, P. W. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1989, 162, 1126–1132. doi:10.1016/0006-291X(89)90790-0
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  12. Albert, A.; Knecht, H.; Andersen, E.; Hungerford, V.; Schreier, M. H.; Papageorgiou, C. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 1998, 8, 2203–2208. doi:10.1016/S0960-894X(98)00365-5
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  13. Jeschke, P.; Harder, A.; Etzel, W.; Dau, W.; Thielking, G.; Bonse, G.; Linuma, K. Pest Manage. Sci. 2001, 57, 1000–1006. doi:10.1002/ps.382
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  14. Cynamon, M. H.; Gimi, R.; Gyenes, F.; Sharpe, C. A.; Bergmann, K. E.; Han, H. J.; Gregor, L. B.; Rapolu, R.; Luciano, G.; Welch, J. T. J. Med. Chem. 1995, 38, 3902–3907. doi:10.1021/jm00020a003
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  15. Guntreddi, T.; Vanjari, R.; Singh, K. N. Org. Lett. 2014, 16, 3624–3627. doi:10.1021/ol501482g
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  16. Bergman, J.; Pettersson, B.; Hasimbegovic, V.; Svensson, P. H. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 76, 1546–1553. doi:10.1021/jo101865y
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  17. Sun, Y.; Jiang, H.; Wu, W.; Zeng, W.; Li, J. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2014, 12, 700–707. doi:10.1039/C3OB42275E
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  18. Priebbenowa, D. L.; Bolm, C. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 7870–7880. doi:10.1039/c3cs60154d
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  19. Wang, X.; Ji, M.; Lim, S.; Jang, H.-Y. J. Org. Chem. 2014, 79, 7256–7260. doi:10.1021/jo501378v
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  20. Patra, M.; Hess, J.; Konatschnig, S.; Spingler, B.; Gasser, G. Organometallics 2013, 32, 6098–6105. doi:10.1021/om400715m
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  21. Nguyen, T. B.; Tran, M. Q.; Ermolenko, L.; Al-Mourabit, A. Org. Lett. 2014, 16, 310–313. doi:10.1021/ol403345e
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  22. Čechová, L.; Jansa, P.; Šála, M.; Dračínský, M.; Holý, A.; Janeba, Z. Tetrahedron 2011, 67, 866–871. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2010.12.040
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  23. Wang, J.; Hou, J.-T.; Wen, J.; Zhang, J.; Yu, X.-Q. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 3652–3654. doi:10.1039/c0cc05811d
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  24. Kumagai, T.; Anki, T.; Ebi, T.; Konishi, A.; Matsumoto, K.; Kurata, H.; Kubo, T.; Katsumoto, K.; Kitamura, C.; Kawase, T. Tetrahedron 2010, 66, 8968–8973. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2010.09.037
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  25. Wan, Y.; Alterman, M.; Larhed, M.; Hallberg, A. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 6232–6235. doi:10.1021/jo025965a
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  26. Sharma, A.; Mehta, V. P.; Van der Eycken, E. Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 2605–2610. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2008.01.030
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  27. Amupitan, J. O. Synthesis 1983, 730–735. doi:10.1055/s-1983-30490
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  28. Nooshabadi, M.; Aghapoor, K.; Darabi, H. R.; Mojtahedi, M. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 7549–7552. doi:10.1016/S0040-4039(99)01600-7
    Return to citation in text: [1]

© 2015 Liu et al; licensee Beilstein-Institut.
This is an Open Access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The license is subject to the Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry terms and conditions: (http://www.beilstein-journals.org/bjoc)

Other Beilstein-Institut Open Science Activities
Journal Logo
Institut Logo
Preprint Logo
Symposia Logo