Chiral Cu(II)-catalyzed enantioselective β-borylation of α,β-unsaturated nitriles in water

  1. Lei Zhu,
  2. Taku Kitanosono,
  3. Pengyu Xu and
  4. Shū Kobayashi

Department of Chemistry, School of Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan

  1. Corresponding author email

This article is part of the Thematic Series "Copper catalysis in organic synthesis".

Guest Editor: S. R. Chemler
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2015, 11, 2007–2011. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjoc.11.217
Received 25 Jun 2015, Accepted 01 Sep 2015, Published 27 Oct 2015

Abstract

The promising performance of copper(II) complexes was demonstrated for asymmetric boron conjugate addition to α,β-unsaturated nitriles in water. The catalyst system, which consisted of Cu(OAc)2 and a chiral 2,2′-bipyridine ligand, enabled β-borylation and chiral induction in water. Subsequent protonation, which was accelerated in aqueous medium, led to high activity of this asymmetric catalysis. Both solid and liquid substrates were suitable despite being insoluble in water.

Keywords: carbon–boron bond formation; catalytic asymmetric synthesis; chiral copper(II) catalysis; β-hydroxy nitriles

Introduction

In recent years, optically active organoboranes have attracted considerable attraction as versatile synthons for the synthesis of biologically interesting compounds and of other materials. In particular, compounds with a nitrile group in the β-position with respect to the boron moiety represent an important subset of organoboron intermediates because these compounds contain two functional groups. Their C–B linkage can be transformed into C–O, C–N, as well as into C–C bonds, while retaining stereogenic centers [1-4]. The nitrile group can be transformed into a range of functional groups, such as amides [5], carboxylic acids [6], aldehydes [7], esters [8], alcohols [9], and amines [10]. Enantioselective boron conjugate addition to α,β-unsaturated nitriles provides one of the most efficient routes to chiral β-boryl nitriles. Several straightforward methods have been developed that rely on chiral Cu(I) complexes with air-sensitive phosphine ligands [11-15]. In contrast, Cu(II)-based catalysis, which has been reported recently for asymmetric boron conjugate addition, is characterized by the effective and thermodynamically stable catalysis in water. Furthermore, a broad range of α,β-unsaturated acceptors, including one example of an α,β-unsaturated nitrile, are applicable, and the reactions, which exhibit extremely high TOF values, can be performed easily without requiring the preparation of an array of chiral ligands [1,16-19]. Rapid protonation in water subsequent to β-borylation would liberate the desired adducts almost instantaneously. In addition to the synthetic utility of enantiomerically enriched β-boryl nitriles, Cu(II)-based activation of α,β-unsaturated nitriles in water is mechanistically curious. In previous reports, homogeneous catalysts composed of Cu(OAc)2 were found to be more effective than insoluble Cu(OH)2-based catalysts in the asymmetric β-borylation of α,β-unsaturated nitriles in water [1,19]. Herein, we describe the Cu(II)-catalyzed asymmetric boron conjugate addition of α,β-unsaturated nitriles in water.

Results and Discussion

At the outset, an aqueous solution of a chiral Cu(II) complex was formed by vigorous stirring of Cu(OAc)2 with chiral 2,2′-bipyridine ligand L for 1 h. After successive addition of cinnamonitrile (1a) and bis(pinacolato)diboron, the resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature for 12 h. Subsequent oxidation by treatment with NaBO3 was conducted to determine the enantioselectivity. The desired β-hydroxynitrile 2a was obtained in 84% yield with 81% ee (Scheme 1), which is consistent with the outcome obtained when the reaction was performed at 5 °C (86% yield, 82% ee [1]). The reactions proceeded smoothly despite the fact that both solid substrates were almost completely insoluble in water. Notably, the desired β-borylated product was isolated as the β-hydroxynitrile after subsequent oxidation, with complete retention of the expected stereochemistry. β-Hydroxynitriles, which are conventionally synthesized by asymmetric addition of acetonitrile to aldehydes [6,20] or by lipase- or nitrilase-catalyzed kinetic resolution of racemic β-hydroxynitriles [21,22], are fascinating candidates for the development of many synthetically feasible derivatives.

[1860-5397-11-217-i1]

Scheme 1: Standard reaction conditions.

When studying these systems, it is important to understand how the conformation of the substrate geometry correlates with its reactivity and enantioselectivity in water. The conjugated system tends to undergo Lewis acid assisted isomerization in water [18]. With three mixtures of 1b with different E/Z ratios in hand, their activity toward boron conjugate addition and the sense of stereoselection were examined under the optimal conditions (Table 1). After stirring the reaction mixture for 12 h and subsequent oxidation, β-hydroxynitrile 2b was obtained in the same yield and with the same enantioselectivity, irrespective of substrate geometry. Notably, the E/Z geometry of α,β-unsaturated nitrile 1b did not have an influence on the initial reaction rate, nor was there a difference in the activity or the enantiofacial differentiation between the E- and Z-isomers.

Table 1: Asymmetric β-borylation of 1b with different configurations.

[Graphic 1]
Entry E/Z ratio of 1b Yield (%)a ee (%)b
1 4.3:1 66 78
2 5.7:1 65 76
3 >99:<1 68 76

aIsolated yield. bDetermined by chiral HPLC analysis.

The scope of the reaction with respect to α,β-unsaturated nitriles bearing an aromatic ring was then investigated (Table 2). In addition to 1b, electron-poor α,β-unsaturated nitriles 1c and 1d also reacted with the diboron reagent to give the desired products in good to high yields with good to high enantioselectivities. No significant deterioration of chiral induction was observed upon changing the electronic nature of the double bonds. Meanwhile, heterocyclic substrate 1e, bearing a furan ring, was also tolerated under the reaction conditions and this compound underwent enantioselective β-borylation to afford β-hydroxynitrile 2e in 87% yield with 87% ee. Remarkably, when β,β-disubstituted α,β-unsaturated nitrile 1f was employed, the desired β-hydroxynitrile 2f bearing a quaternary asymmetric carbon center could be successfully produced in 75% yield with 85% ee.

Table 2: Scope of the Cu(II)-catalyzed asymmetric borylation with respect to aromatic α,β-unsaturated nitriles.

[Graphic 2]
Entry Substrate Product Yield (%)a ee (%)b
1 [Graphic 3]
1a
[Graphic 4]
2a
84 81
2 [Graphic 5]
1b
[Graphic 6]
2b
66 78
3 [Graphic 7]
1c
[Graphic 8]
2c
92 90
4 [Graphic 9]
1d
[Graphic 10]
2d
75 81
5 [Graphic 11]
1e
[Graphic 12]
2e
87 87
6 [Graphic 13]
1f
[Graphic 14]
2f
75 85

aIsolated yield. bDetermined by chiral HPLC analysis.

Finally, to examine the suitability of aliphatic α,β-unsaturated nitriles as substrates for the reaction, the asymmetric β-borylation and subsequent oxidation of crotonitrile (1g) were attempted (Scheme 2). The obtained β-hydroxynitrile 2g was converted into the corresponding benzyl ether 3g in the presence of Ag2O [23], followed by hydrolysis with TiCl4 in AcOH [24] without loss of enantiopurity of 3g. The sense of enantioselection of 3g was proved to be the same as that of the β-borylated aromatic products shown in Table 2, according to the reported chiral information of β-hydroxyamide 4g [25]. It is noted that even an aliphatic α,β-unsaturated nitrile worked well under the reaction conditions to afford the desired compound in high yield with high enantioselectivity.

[1860-5397-11-217-i2]

Scheme 2: Formation of aliphatic chiral β-hydroxy nitrile 2g and its subsequent conversion into 4g.

Conclusion

We have demonstrated that a chiral Cu(II) complex formed with chiral 2,2′-bipyridine ligand L constitutes a green and efficient catalyst for asymmetric boron conjugate addition of α,β-unsaturated nitriles in water. Both aromatic and aliphatic α,β-unsaturated nitriles were applicable, and both gave the corresponding chiral β-hydroxynitriles after oxidation with high enantioselectivity. In contrast to well-documented Cu(I) catalytic systems in organic solvents, Cu(II) catalysis in water does not require the use of air-sensitive phosphine ligands or strong bases. Notably, neither the chemical nor physical properties of the α,β-unsaturated nitriles had any influence on either the reactivity or the stereochemical outcome of the reaction; that is, the reaction proceeded well irrespective of whether the sample was solid or liquid, or whether the E- or Z-isomer was used.

Supporting Information

Supporting Information File 1: General procedure, analytical data and spectra of all compounds, methods for conversion.
Format: PDF Size: 2.4 MB Download

Acknowledgements

This work was partially supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Science Research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS), Global COE Program, The University of Tokyo, MEXT, Japan, and the Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST). P.X. thanks the JSPS for a Research Fellowship for Young Scientists.

References

  1. Kitanosono, T.; Xu, P.; Kobayashi, S. Chem. – Asian J. 2014, 9, 179–188. doi:10.1002/asia.201300997
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4]
  2. Lee, J. C. H.; McDonald, R.; Hall, D. G. Nat. Chem. 2011, 3, 894–899. doi:10.1038/nchem.1150
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  3. Solé, C.; Tatla, A.; Mata, J. A.; Whiting, A.; Gulyás, H.; Fernández, E. Chem. – Eur. J. 2011, 17, 14248–14257. doi:10.1002/chem.201102081
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  4. Scott, H. K.; Aggarwal, V. K. Chem. – Eur. J. 2011, 17, 13124–13132. doi:10.1002/chem.201102581
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  5. Battilocchio, C.; Hawkins, J. M.; Ley, S. V. Org. Lett. 2014, 16, 1060–1063. doi:10.1021/ol403591c
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  6. Suto, Y.; Kumagai, N.; Matsunaga, S.; Kanai, M.; Shibasaki, M. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 3147–3150. doi:10.1021/ol035206u
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  7. Okumura, T.; Hayami, S.; Ozawa, T.; Funahashi, Y.; Maeda, Y.; Masuda, H. Chem. Lett. 2007, 36, 96–97. doi:10.1246/cl.2007.96
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  8. Jaroszewski, J. W.; Ettlinger, M. G. J. Org. Chem. 1988, 53, 4635–4637. doi:10.1021/jo00254a056
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  9. Lown, J. W.; Chauhan, S. M. S. J. Org. Chem. 1981, 46, 2479–2489. doi:10.1021/jo00325a011
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  10. Giannis, A.; Sandhoff, K. Angew. Chem. 1989, 101, 220–222. doi:10.1002/ange.19891010231
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  11. Stavber, G.; Časar, Z. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2013, 27, 159–165. doi:10.1002/aoc.2957
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  12. Sole, C.; Bonet, A.; De Vries, A. H. M.; De Vries, J. G.; Lefort, L.; Gulyás, H.; Fernández, E. Organometallics 2012, 31, 7855–7861. doi:10.1021/om300194k
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  13. Hirsch-Weil, D.; Abboud, K. A.; Hong, S. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 7525–7527. doi:10.1039/c0cc02211j
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  14. Lee, J.-E.; Yun, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 145–147. doi:10.1002/anie.200703699
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  15. Mun, S.; Lee, J.-E.; Yun, J. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 4887–4889. doi:10.1021/ol061955a
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  16. Zhu, L.; Kitanosono, T.; Xu, P.; Kobayashi, S. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 11685–11688. doi:10.1039/c5cc04295j
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  17. Kitanosono, T.; Xu, P.; Isshiki, S.; Zhu, L.; Kobayashi, S. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 9336–9339. doi:10.1039/c4cc04062g
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  18. Kitanosono, T.; Xu, P.; Kobayashi, S. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 8184–8186. doi:10.1039/c3cc44324h
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  19. Kobayashi, S.; Xu, P.; Endo, T.; Ueno, M.; Kitanosono, T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 12763–12766. doi:10.1002/anie.201207343
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  20. Suto, Y.; Tsuji, R.; Kanai, M.; Shibasaki, M. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 3757–3760. doi:10.1021/ol051423e
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  21. Itoh, T.; Mitsukura, K.; Kanphai, W.; Takagi, Y.; Kihara, H.; Tsukube, H. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 9165–9172. doi:10.1021/jo971288m
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  22. Kamila, S.; Zhu, D.; Biehl, E. R.; Hua, L. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 4429–4431. doi:10.1021/ol061542+
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  23. Ma, D.-Y.; Wang, D.-X.; Pan, J.; Huang, Z.-T.; Wang, M.-X. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 4087–4091. doi:10.1021/jo800074k
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  24. Mukaiyama, T.; Kamio, K.; Kobayashi, S.; Takei, H. Chem. Lett. 1973, 2, 357–358. doi:10.1246/cl.1973.357
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  25. Ma, D.-Y.; Zheng, Q.-Y.; Wang, D.-X.; Wang, M.-X. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 3231–3234. doi:10.1021/ol0610688
    Return to citation in text: [1]

Article is part of the thematic issue

Interesting articles

Balaram S. Takale, Ruchita R. Thakore, Elham Etemadi-Davan and Bruce H. Lipshutz

Jundi Xue, Ziyi Han, Gen Li, Khalisha A. Emmanuel, Cynthia L. McManus, Qiang Sui, Dongmian Ge, Qi Gao and Li Cai

© 2015 Zhu et al; licensee Beilstein-Institut.
This is an Open Access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The license is subject to the Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry terms and conditions: (http://www.beilstein-journals.org/bjoc)

 
Back to Article List

Other Beilstein-Institut Open Science Activities

Keep Informed

RSS Feed

Subscribe to our Latest Articles RSS Feed.

Subscribe

Follow the Beilstein-Institut

LinkedIn

Twitter: @BeilsteinInst