Microfluidic radiosynthesis of [18F]FEMPT, a high affinity PET radiotracer for imaging serotonin receptors

  1. Thomas Lee Collier1,2ORCID Logo,
  2. Steven H. Liang1ORCID Logo,
  3. J. John Mann3,
  4. Neil Vasdev2ORCID Logo and
  5. J. S. Dileep Kumar3ORCID Logo

1Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
2Advion, Inc., Ithaca, NY, USA
3Molecular Imaging and Neuropathology Division, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA

  1. Corresponding author email

This article is part of the Thematic Series "Organo-fluorine chemistry IV".

Guest Editor: D. O'Hagan
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2017, 13, 2922–2927. doi:10.3762/bjoc.13.285
Received 27 Oct 2017, Accepted 18 Dec 2017, Published 29 Dec 2017

Abstract

Continuous-flow microfluidics has shown increased applications in radiochemistry over the last decade, particularly for both pre-clinical and clinical production of fluorine-18 labeled radiotracers. The main advantages of microfluidics are the reduction in reaction times and consumption of reagents that often result in increased radiochemical yields and rapid optimization of reaction parameters for 18F-labeling. In this paper, we report on the two-step microfluidic radiosynthesis of the high affinity partial agonist of the serotonin 1A receptor, [18F]FEMPT (pKi = 9. 79; Ki = 0.16 nM) by microfluidic radiochemistry. [18F]FEMPT was obtained in ≈7% isolated radiochemical yield and in >98% radiochemical and chemical purity. The molar activity of the final product was determined to be >148 GBq/µmol (>4 Ci/µmol).

Keywords: agonist; fluorine-18; 5-HT1A; microfluidics; PET

Introduction

The development of serotonin 1A receptor (5-HT1AR) agonist radiotracers for applications in molecular imaging with positron emission tomography (PET) has been avidly sought over the past two decades, albeit with limited success. The current status of serotonin-targeting radiopharmaceuticals was recently reviewed by Paterson et al. [1] and their conclusion was that “the development of PET and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) radioligands to image serotonergic targets is of high interest, and successful evaluation in humans is leading to invaluable insight into normal and abnormal brain function”. A further review by us focusing on 5-HT1AR overviewed a number of PET and SPECT tracers that have been tested in vivo with varying efficacy [2]. A few representative compounds which show the structures that have been tested as radiotracers are shown in Figure 1.

[1860-5397-13-285-1]

Figure 1: Representative examples of recent 5-HT1AR agonists [3-9].

The 5-HT1AR is implicated in the pathophysiology of a variety of neuropsychiatric and neurodegenerative disease states as well as in the mechanism of action of antidepressants. The 5-HT1AR exists in low and high agonist affinity states. The antagonist ligands have similar affinity to the low affinity (LA) and high affinity (HA) conformations of 5-HT1AR. However, agonist ligands prefer binding to the HA state of the receptor. This is coupled to G-protein and thus agonist binding gives a more meaningful functional measure of the 5-HT1AR that can reflect desensitization and supersensitivity. Significant research has been directed at the differences between agonist and antagonist binding to 5-HT1A receptors in Alzheimer's disease [10] and this interest has led to the development of a high-resolution in vivo atlas for four of the human brain's serotonin receptors and transporters [11].

Antagonist 5-HT1AR PET tracers can detect the total receptor binding, but not modifications in the high affinity 5-HT1AR binding in disease states or in the context of treatment functionally larger and earlier effects of antidepressants. The development of 5-HT1AR agonist PET tracers for the past 2 decades has met with limited success. An arylpiperazine derivative of 3,5-dioxo-(2H,4H)-1,2,4-triazine radiolabeled with carbon-11 (t½ = 20.4 min), [11C]MPT, is the first successful agonist PET tracer reported for 5-HT1AR in non-human primates. The binding of [11C]MPT in baboon brain was in excellent agreement with the known distribution of the 5-HT1AR. Despite the excellent binding profile of [11C]MPT, the slow washout in baboons limits this radiotracer from advancing to human studies. Our recent efforts have focused on the development of fluorine-18 (t½ = 109.7 min) labelled MPT derivatives, as the longer half-life enables imaging protocols that can provide a better match of the pharmacokinetics of binding to the half-life of the radionuclide, as well as simplified radiochemistry protocols and the long-term goal of distribution for multicenter clinical trials.

Several reports on the use of continuous flow microfluidics for radiofluorination have shown higher yields, with less amount of reagents and shorter reaction times compared to traditional vessel-based techniques [12]. Microfluidic techniques also allow for cost-effective and rapid optimization of reaction parameters for new radiotracers as simultaneous reactions can be carried out. We have recently shown that continuous flow microfluidics is suitable for 18F-radiopharmaceutical production studies [13] and have applied this technique in human PET imaging studies [14]. Herein we present the microfluidic synthesis and evaluation of [18F]FEMPT as an agonist PET ligand for 5-HT1AR.

Results and Discussion

Synthesis and binding affinity of FEMPT

Desmethyl-MPT, the radiolabeling precursor, was synthesized as described previously [15]. The reference standard FEMPT (7) was synthesized in 70% by reacting desmethyl-MPT (6) with 1-bromo-2-fluoroethane in the presence of K2CO3 (Scheme 1 and Supporting Information File 1).

[1860-5397-13-285-i1]

Scheme 1: Synthesis of FEMPT (7).

The in vitro binding assays to establish the potency and selectivity of FEMPT towards 5-HT1AR and various other biogenic amines, brain receptors, and transporters were evaluated by the National Institute of Mental Health Psychoactive Drug Screening Program (NIMH-PDSP). FEMPT shows 0.2 nM binding affinity (Ki) to 5-HT1AR. The next closest bindings for MPT are Sigma2 PC12, H1, 5-HT7, and 5-HT1B (Table 1) and are >50 times higher than 5-HT1AR. The Ki values for several other brain receptors and transporters were low (0.1 to 10 μM). Agonist properties of FEMPT on 5-HT1AR were estimated by [35S]GTPγS binding in membranes of CHO cells which stably express human 5-HT1AR. A dose-dependent increase in [35S]GTPγS binding was induced by FEMPT. Maximal FEMPT stimulated [35S]GTPγS binding Emax was 100% of that seen with 5-HT and an EC50 of 85 nM.

Table 1: Kis of FEMPT for receptors and transporters.

Targets Ki values (nM) Targets Ki values (nM) Targets Ki values (nM)
5-HT1A 0.2 adrenergicα1 180 D1 >10,000
5-HT1B 122.5 adrenergicαB 196 D2 80
5-HT2A 406 adrenergicαD 142 D3 35
5-HT2B 12 adrenergicα2A 346 D4 24
5-HT2C 343 adrenergicα2B 403 D5 >10,000
5-HT3 >10,000 adrenergicα2C 400 DAT 407.4
5-HT5A 2340 adrenergicβ1 1300 sigma2 PC12 10
5-HT6 71 adrenergicβ2 202 DAT 407.4
5-HT7 11 adrenergicβ3 564 DOR >10,000
A2, A3, A4 >10,000 H1 11 EP >10,000
BZP >10,000 H2 1364 GABA >10,000
Ca2+ >10,000 H3, H4 >10,000 smoothened >10,000
AMPA >10,000 hERG >10,000 Y2 >10,000
NET 6980 KOR 1423 SERT 6144
NK >10,000 M >10,000 sigma2 >10,000
sigma1 1014 MDR1 >10,000 VMAT1,2 >10,000
V1, V2 >10,000 MOR >10,000 NT1 >10,000
Na+ channel >10,000 mGluR >10,000 imidazoline >10,000
CB1, CB2 >10,000 NMDA >10,000    
5-HT1AR Emax 100% EC50 85 nM    

Microfluidic chemistry

Reaction optimization of radiofluorination methods vary depending on the microfluidic systems being used but we can typically optimize 18F-labeling reaction conditions in one or two days from a single batch of [18F]fluoride. This is significantly more efficient than classical vial-based radiofluorination methods which, generally involves several experimental days and analysis as each reaction, including azeotropic drying of [18F]fluoride, must be carried out individually. The microfluidic radiosynthesis of [18F]FEMPT was optimized by treating the reactions as 2 individual steps, using the Discovery mode of the Advion NanoTek® microfluidic synthesizer [16]. The first step is the preparation of the labeling reagent [18F]fluoroethyltosylate (10) via tetraethylammonium fluoride ([18F]TEAF). The second step is the reaction of the [18F]fluoroethyltosylate (10), with the FEMPT precursor 8 (Scheme 2).

[1860-5397-13-285-i2]

Scheme 2: Radiosynthetic scheme for the microfluidic flow synthesis of [18F]fluoroethyltosylate (10) and [18F]FEMPT (7).

Step 1: Synthesis of [18F]fluoroethyltosylate (10)

Using the NanoTek Discovery mode, in the 1-step configuration, the synthesis of [18F]fluoroethyltosylate (10) was optimized, initially using the reported methods which used up to 32 mg/mL of the ditosylate 9 [17], At this concentration of ditosylate 9, up to 55% radiochemical conversion (RCC) were noted (Figure 2A). However, if this high concentration is used for the 2-step preparation, it would lead to low product yields due to the competition of the large amounts of unreacted ditosylate with the precursor 8. By altering the ratios between the [18F]fluoride and the ditosylate precursor 9, the minimum concentration of the ditosylate precursor could be rapidly determined (Figure 2B). The reaction of [18F]TEAF with ethylene glycol ditosylate (4 mg/mL, 10 µmol/mL) in DMSO in the first reactor resulted in a final solution concentration of 5 µmol/mL of the ethylene ditosylate, and still yielded ≈45% RCC.

[1860-5397-13-285-2]

Figure 2: (A) Incorporation yield of [18F]fluoride versus flow rate, red line 180 °C, blue line 150 °C, moderately high yields can be obtained; (B) Incorporation yield of [18F]fluoride versus ditosylate concentration. An incorporation yield of almost 50% was obtained with only 4 mg/mL.

Step 2: Reaction of [18F]fluoroethyltosylate (10) with FEMPT precursor 8

The [18F]fluoroethyltosylate solution, prepared in the first step of the reaction was then mixed with the precursor phenolate 8 (2 mg/mL, 5 µmol/mL) at various flow rates, temperatures and ratios using the Discovery mode of the Advion NanoTek software. The concentration of the precursor was selected such that at a 1:1 ratio, the [18F]fluoroethyltosylate and ditosylate solution would not completely consume the precursor during the second step, as there is no purification of the [18F]fluoroethyltosylate from the ditosylate prior to the second step. Selected results are shown in Table 2.

Table 2: Selected reaction conditions for two-step continuous-flow radiosynthesis.

Flow rate (μL/min) Reactor temperature (°C) P2 : Reaction 1 ratio % Radiochemical yield
P1 and P3 combined P2 Reactor 1 Reactor 2
50 70 170 150 2 10
50 100 170 125 1 4
50 100 170 170 1 7
50 50 170 170 1 12
50 50 170 150 1 22

The final product was then purified on a Phenomenex Luna column, 10 × 250 mm, 5 μm, with a mobile phase of 55% MeCN: 45% 10 mM phosphate at a flow rate of 5 mL/min. The HPLC fraction containing the product was collected and diluted with 20 mL of sterile water for injection, then this diluted solution was trapped on a HLB SPE light cartridge, washed with 10 mL of water, eluted from the HLB cartridge with 1 mL ethanol and diluted with 10 mL of 0.9% NaCl solution (saline). [18F]FEMPT was obtained in ≈7% isolated radiochemical yield and in >98% radiochemical and chemical purity. The identity of the radiotracer was confirmed by co-injection with the standard (see Supporting Information File 1). The use of microfluidics allowed the optimization of the radiosynthesis in one day. The molar activity of the final product was determined to be >148 GBq/µmol (>4 Ci/µmol) by both UV spectroscopy and mass spectrometry methods and both methods were found to be in agreement. The chemical purity was determined using both UV spectroscopy and mass spectrometry and little chlorinated (<0.1%) and no elimination product was seen by mass spectrometry.

To determine the products being formed during the radiosynthesis the final formulation was analyzed by LC–MS using 1 mL of the final product solution trapped on a concentration system, which consists of the replacement of the injection loop with a trapping cartridge (Valco Instruments Co. Inc, Houston, TX, Fingertight cartridge assembly #SFECH412, packed with Waters HLB SPE packing material) and the rest of the system remains as standard for the chromatography system. In the UV chromatogram observed on the HPLC system from the direct injection almost no signal is observed. However, when 1 mL of the solution of the purified radiotracer was injected via the trapping system, the UV traces indicate the presence of a number of species with retention times close to the desired product (Figure 3).

[1860-5397-13-285-3]

Figure 3: Analysis of the final formulated product by LC–MS, using the trapping system to improve the sensitivity. Red line is the UV spectra observed at 254 nm. Column = 3 µm, 4.6 × 150 mm C18, Phenomenex, Luna. Solvent MeCN:0.1% formic acid, Flow rate = 1 mL/min, Gradient from 20% ACN to 95% ACN at 10 minutes, hold for 2 minutes at 95% MeCN. Insets are the structures identified using the MS data. Mass spectra obtained using an Expression-L Compact Mass Spectrometer (Advion Inc., USA), APCI ion source operating in positive ion mode and corona discharge of 5 μA, m/z scan range: 200–500.

A number of the observed impurities were able to be identified using LC–MS and the major impurities observed were the expected elimination product and the hydroxy product. However, all of these materials were below the mass seen for the desired FEMPT and the combined signals were used in the molar activity calculation. Also seen was the presence of tetrabutylammonium salt, which appeared through the semi-preparative purification and the reformulation step. However, the signal for the tetrabutylammonium salt corresponds to <10 µg/mL.

Conclusion

In summary, [18F]FEMPT was efficiently synthesized by continuous flow microfluidics. This protocol is generally applicable for the implementation of a suitable microfluidic process to optimize classical 18F-radiofluorination reactions. Preclinical PET imaging studies with this radiotracer are underway.

Supporting Information

Supporting Information File 1: Experimental part.
Format: PDF Size: 460.5 KB Download

References

  1. Paterson, L. M.; Kornum, B. R.; Nutt, D. J.; Pike, V. W.; Knudsen, G. M. Med. Res. Rev. 2013, 33, 54. doi:10.1002/med.20245
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  2. Kumar, J. S. D.; Mann, J. J. Cent. Nerv. Syst. Agents Med. Chem. 2014, 14, 96. doi:10.2174/1871524914666141030124316
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  3. Valhondo, M.; Marco, I.; Martin-Fontecha, M.; Vázquez-Villa, H.; Ramos, J. A.; Berkels, R.; Lauterbach, T.; Benhamú, B.; López-Rodriguez, M. L. J. Med. Chem. 2013, 56, 7851. doi:10.1021/jm400766k
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  4. Fornaretto, M. G.; Caccia, C.; Marchi, G.; Brambilla, E.; Mantegani, S.; Post, C. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1997, 812, 226. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1997.tb48184.x
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  5. Dawson, L. A.; Watson, J. M. CNS Neurosci. Ther. 2009, 15, 107. doi:10.1111/j.1755-5949.2008.00067.x
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  6. Dounay, A. B.; Barta, N. S.; Bikker, J. A.; Borosky, S. A.; Campbell, B. M.; Crawford, T.; Denny, L.; Evans, L. M.; Gray, D. L.; Lee, P.; Lenoir, E. A.; Xu, W. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2009, 19, 1159. doi:10.1016/j.bmcl.2008.12.087
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  7. Siracusa, M. A.; Salerno, L.; Modica, M. N.; Pittalà, V.; Romeo, G.; Amato, M. E.; Nowak, M.; Bojarski, A. J.; Mereghetti, I.; Cagnotto, A.; Mennini, T. J. Med. Chem. 2008, 51, 4529. doi:10.1021/jm800176x
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  8. Franchini, S.; Prandi, A.; Sorbi, C.; Tait, A.; Baraldi, A.; Angeli, P.; Buccioni, M.; Cilia, A.; Poggesi, E.; Fossa, P.; Brasili, L. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2010, 20, 2017. doi:10.1016/j.bmcl.2010.01.030
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  9. Liu, Z.; Zhang, H.; Ye, N.; Zhang, J.; Wu, Q.; Sun, P.; Li, L.; Zhen, X.; Zhang, A. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 53, 1319. doi:10.1021/jm9015763
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  10. Vidal, B.; Sebti, J.; Verdurand, M.; Fieux, S.; Billard, T.; Streichenberger, N.; Troakes, C.; Newman-Tancredi, A.; Zimmer, L. Neuropharmacology 2016, 109, 88. doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2016.05.009
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  11. Beliveau, V.; Ganz, M.; Feng, L.; Ozenne, B.; Højgaard, L.; Fisher, P. M.; Svarer, C.; Greve, D. N.; Knudsen, G. M. J. Neurosci. 2017, 37, 120. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2830-16.2016
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  12. Pascali, G.; Watts, P.; Salvadori, P. A. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2013, 40, 776. doi:10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2013.04.004
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  13. Liang, S. H.; Yokell, D. L.; Jackson, R. N.; Rice, P. A.; Callahan, R.; Johnson, K. A.; Alagille, D.; Tamagnan, G.; Collier, T. L.; Vasdev, N. MedChemComm 2014, 5, 432. doi:10.1039/C3MD00335C
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  14. Liang, S. H.; Yokell, D. L.; Normandin, M. D.; Rice, P. A.; Jackson, R. N.; Shoup, T. M.; Brady, T. J.; Fakhri, G. E.; Collier, T. L.; Vasdev, N. Mol. Imaging 2014, 13, 7290201400025.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  15. Kumar, J. S. D.; Majo, V. J.; Hsiung, S.-C.; Millak, M. S.; Liu, K.-P.; Tamir, H.; Prabhakaran, J.; Simpson, N. R.; Van Heertum, R. L.; Mann, J. J.; Parsey, R. V. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 125. doi:10.1021/jm050725j
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  16. Pascali, G.; Matesic, L.; Collier, T. L.; Wyatt, N.; Fraser, B. H.; Pham, T. Q.; Salvadori, P. A.; Greguric, I. Nat. Protoc. 2014, 9, 2017. doi:10.1038/nprot.2014.137
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  17. Pascali, G.; Mazzone, G.; Saccomanni, G.; Manera, C.; Salvadori, P. A. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2010, 37, 547. doi:10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2010.03.006
    Return to citation in text: [1]

© 2017 Collier et al.; licensee Beilstein-Institut.
This is an Open Access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The license is subject to the Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry terms and conditions: (http://www.beilstein-journals.org/bjoc)

 
Back to Article List