Imide arylation with aryl(TMP)iodonium tosylates

  1. Souradeep Basu,
  2. Alexander H. Sandtorv and
  3. David R. StuartORCID Logo

Department of Chemistry, Portland State University, Portland OR 97201, United States

  1. Corresponding author email

This article is part of the Thematic Series "Hypervalent iodine chemistry in organic synthesis".

Guest Editor: T. Wirth
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2018, 14, 1034–1038. doi:10.3762/bjoc.14.90
Received 23 Feb 2018, Accepted 27 Apr 2018, Published 11 May 2018


Herein, we describe the synthesis of N-aryl phthalimides by metal-free coupling of potassium phthalimide with unsymmetrical aryl(TMP)iodonium tosylate salts. The aryl transfer from the iodonium moiety occurs under electronic control with the electron-rich trimethoxyphenyl group acting as a competent dummy ligand. The yields of N-aryl phthalimides are moderate to high and the coupling reaction is compatible with electron-deficient and sterically encumbered aryl groups.

Keywords: arylation; C–N coupling; diaryliodonium; hypercoordinate iodine; metal-free


Imides are important structural units in a range of approved pharmaceuticals and agrochemicals (Scheme 1a) [1]. Despite the general prevalence of imides, N-aryl imide derivatives are relatively rare in such compounds. We were surprised by this disparity, but found that a lack of methods to synthesize N-aryl imides may explain their scarcity; this is particularly true relative to other N-aryl compounds. The survey of methods revealed that the dominant approach to N-aryl imides is to employ aniline starting materials (Scheme 1b, left), as was done in the synthesis of pentoxazone and related herbicides [2]. The alternative aromatic substitution approach with imide anions (Scheme 1b, right) is hampered by their low nucleophilicity [3]. Therefore, transition metals feature prominently in such methods, but even recent examples employ stoichiometric metal mediators [4]. Metal-free methods by classic SNAr are also attractive, but only possible on very electron-deficient arene substrates [5]. Diaryliodonium salts are useful reagents for metal-free aryl transfer [6-10] and Muñiz and co-workers have recently reported an elegant study on sterically controlled C–N coupling of 2,6-disubstituted aryl(phenyl)iodonium salts and imides [11]. We have been investigating the generality of electronically controlled aryl transfer from aryl(trimethoxyphenyl)iodonium salts [12-14] and describe here the development of a C–N coupling of a phthalimide anion with non-sterically biased aryl groups. The protocol is compatible with ortho-, meta-, and para-substitution on the aryl group and the phthalimide moiety may also provide access to anilines.


Scheme 1: Imides as an important scaffold.

Results and Discussion

We initiated our optimization of the arylation of the potassium phthalimide nucleophile with diaryliodonium electrophiles by surveying several reaction conditions: dummy ligand (Aux), counter anion, solvent and volume, reaction temperature, and stoichiometry (Table 1). Consistent with an electronically controlled aryl transfer, the trimethoxyphenyl (TMP) auxiliary was superior to mesityl (Mes), phenyl (Ph), and anisyl (An) auxiliaries under several different reaction conditions (Table 1, entries 1–3; 11 and 12; 16 and 17). While the counter anion did not exert a dramatic influence on the reaction yield, using tosylate (OTs) produced the highest yield in both DCE and toluene as solvent (Table 1, entries 4–8). Given our ability to readily access aryl(TMP)iodonium tosylate salts [12] we continued our optimization with these reagents. We observed a very narrow operating temperature with a maximum yield at 100 °C when toluene was used as solvent (Table 1, entries 9, 10, and 12). We also observed that the reaction yield decreases with dilution (Table 1, entries 13–15). Finally, the yield increases with increasing stoichiometry of phthalimide (Table 1, entries 10, 13, and 17). It is also important to note that under “optimal” conditions (Table 1, entry 17) we did not observe a Phth–TMP adduct. Moreover, we did observe essentially quantitative formation of TMP–I and therefore complete consumption of 1a and high fidelity for aryl transfer selectivity. At this time we are unable to account for the remaining mass balance (≈25%) of the methyl benzoate moiety of 1a. We have employed the conditions of entry 17 (Table 1) as our standard conditions to evaluate the scope of this reaction.

Table 1: Discovery and optimization of reaction conditions.a

[Graphic 1]
Entry X group Aux group Phth. equiv Solvent Temp. (°C) 1H NMR yield
1 TFA Mes 2 DCE (1 mL) 70 27%
2 TFA Ph 2 DCE (1 mL) 70 50%
3 TFA TMP 2 DCE (1 mL) 70 52%
4 TFA TMP 3 DCE (1 mL) 80 54%
5 OTs TMP 3 DCE (1 mL) 80 62%
6 TFA TMP 3 toluene (0.42 mL) 100 50%
7 OTf TMP 3 toluene (0.42 mL) 100 56%
8 OTs TMP 3 toluene (0.42 mL) 100 68%
9 OTs TMP 3 toluene (0.5 mL) 90 64%
10 OTs TMP 3 toluene (0.5 mL) 100 70%
11 OTs Ph 3 toluene (0.5 mL) 100 23%
12 OTs TMP 3 toluene (0.5 mL) 110 62%
13 OTs TMP 1.1 toluene (0.5 mL) 100 39%
14 OTs TMP 1.1 toluene (1 mL) 100 28%
15 OTs TMP 1.1 toluene (1.5 mL) 100 16%
16 OTs An 5 toluene (0.5 mL) 100 46%
17 OTs TMP 5 toluene (0.5 mL) 100 75%

aConditions: 1 (0.1 mmol, 1 equiv), potassium phthalimide (see table for equivalents), solvent (see table), temperature (see table), 24 hours.

We have assessed the scope of compatible aryl groups under our optimal conditions (Scheme 2). Under electronic control, strong electron-withdrawing groups on the aryl ring lead to high yield of N-aryl phthalimide products (Scheme 2, 2ad, 66–90% yield). However, the TMP auxiliary also enables the coupling of phthalimide with moderately electron-deficient aryl groups. For instance the p-chlorophenyl moiety (2e) is coupled to phthalimide in moderate yield (42%). Additionally, we have observed that electronic and steric effects operate in concert to couple an o-tolyl (2f) moiety to phthalimide in high yield (67%). In this case, 2,6-disubstituted aryl groups are not required for a sterically controlled coupling. Finally, as an example two polysubstituted aryl groups are introduced in this coupling reaction, which are specifically enabled by the use of an unsymmetrical aryl(TMP)iodonium electrophile (Scheme 2, 2g and 2h, 42 and 99% yield, respectively).


Scheme 2: Scope of compatible aryl groups. Conditions: 1 (0.5 mmol, 1 equiv), potassium phthalimide (2.5 mmol, 5 equiv), toluene (2.5 mL), 100 °C, 24 hours. Isolated yields are reported.

The phthalimide moiety is well-recognized as an “NH3” surrogate, and the products depicted in Scheme 2 may be deprotected to yield aniline derivatives. In a specific example, 1a is reacted under modified conditions to yield 2a. In this one-pot procedure, hydrazine in aqueous ethanol is added directly to the reaction mixture and aniline 3 is isolated in 63% yield from 1a (Scheme 3).


Scheme 3: One-pot synthesis of anilines.

We have previously described the coupling of aryl(TMP)iodonium tosylates with azide nucleophiles [14]. Azide is a notably stronger nucleophile than phthalimide and it is interesting to compare the reaction of these two nucleophiles with 1a under similar conditions (Table 2). The Mayr nucleophilicity constant of azide [15] is 20.5 and high yield (95%) is observed in a reaction with 1a under relatively mild temperature (65 °C) and short reaction time (2 hours, Table 2, entry 1). The Mayr nucleophilicity constant for phthalimide is five-orders of magnitude lower (15.5) [3] and under similar conditions leads to trace product (Table 2, entry 2). In order to obtain a high yield of 2a, albeit lower than given in entry 1, a higher temperature (100 °C) and a longer reaction time (24 hours) are required (Table 2, entry 3). This suggests that the contribution of nucleophilicity (via Mayr nucleophilicity constants) [16] may be useful in developing other coupling reactions with diaryliodonium electrophiles.

Table 2: Comparison of nucleophilicity.

[Graphic 2]
Entry Nucleophile (Nu) Mayr nucleophilicity Temperature (°C) Time Yield
1 azide 20.5 65 2 hours 95%
2 phthalimide 15.5 65 2 hours trace
3 phthalimide 15.5 100 24 hours 80%


The coupling of both electron-deficient and sterically encumbered aryl groups with a phthalimide anion is achievable with aryl(TMP)iodonium tosylate salts. This is an electronically controlled coupling reaction that is enabled by the TMP auxiliary and complementary to the sterically controlled coupling previously reported. We anticipate that this reaction will find use as a starting point for the synthesis of N-aryl imides in a range of applications.

Supporting Information

Supporting Information File 1: General experimental details, procedures, tabulated spectroscopic data, and 1H, 13C{1H}, and 19F NMR spectra of compounds 1g, 2ai, and 3.
Format: PDF Size: 1.2 MB Download


We acknowledge Portland State University for financial support of this research.


  1. Wishart, D. S.; Feunang, Y. D.; Guo, A. C.; Lo, E. J.; Marcu, A.; Grant, J. R.; Sajed, T.; Johnson, D.; Li, C.; Sayeeda, Z.; Assempour, N.; Iynkkaran, I.; Liu, Y.; Maciejewski, A.; Gale, N.; Wilson, A.; Chin, L.; Cummings, R.; Le, D.; Pon, A.; Knox, C.; Wilson, M. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, D1074–D1082. doi:10.1093/nar/gkx1037
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  2. Fujiwara, T.; O’Hagan, D. J. Fluorine Chem. 2014, 167, 16–29. doi:10.1016/j.jfluchem.2014.06.014
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  3. Breugst, M.; Tokuyasu, T.; Mayr, H. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 5250–5258. doi:10.1021/jo1009883
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  4. Jadhav, B. D.; Pardeshi, S. K. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 14531–14537. doi:10.1039/C6RA00395H
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  5. Payen, O.; Top, S.; Vessières, A.; Brulé, E.; Plamont, M.-A.; McGlinchey, M. J.; Müller-Bunz, H.; Jaouen, G. J. Med. Chem. 2008, 51, 1791–1799. doi:10.1021/jm701264d
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  6. Deprez, N. R.; Sanford, M. S. Inorg. Chem. 2007, 46, 1924–1935. doi:10.1021/ic0620337
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  7. Merritt, E. A.; Olofsson, B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 9052–9070. doi:10.1002/anie.200904689
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  8. Olofsson, B. Arylation with Diaryliodonium Salts. In Hypervalent Iodine Chemistry; Wirth, T., Ed.; Topics in Current Chemistry, Vol. 373; Springer, 2016; pp 135–166. doi:10.1007/128_2015_661
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  9. Aradi, K.; Tóth, B. L.; Tolnai, G. L.; Novák, Z. Synlett 2016, 27, 1456–1485. doi:10.1055/s-0035-1561369
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  10. Stuart, D. R. Chem. – Eur. J. 2017, 23, 15852–15863. doi:10.1002/chem.201702732
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  11. Lucchetti, N.; Scalone, M.; Fantasia, S.; Muñiz, K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 13335–13339. doi:10.1002/anie.201606599
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  12. Seidl, T. L.; Sundalam, S. K.; McCullough, B.; Stuart, D. R. J. Org. Chem. 2016, 81, 1998–2009. doi:10.1021/acs.joc.5b02833
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  13. Sandtorv, A. H.; Stuart, D. R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 15812–15815. doi:10.1002/anie.201610086
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  14. Seidl, T. L.; Stuart, D. R. J. Org. Chem. 2017, 82, 11765–11771. doi:10.1021/acs.joc.7b01599
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  15. Phan, T. B.; Mayr, H. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2006, 19, 706–713. doi:10.1002/poc.1063
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  16. Mayr, H.; Ofial, A. R. Acc. Chem. Res. 2016, 49, 952–965. doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00071
    Return to citation in text: [1]

© 2018 Basu et al.; licensee Beilstein-Institut.
This is an Open Access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The license is subject to the Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry terms and conditions: (

Back to Article List