Recent advances in the gold-catalyzed additions to C–C multiple bonds

  1. He Huang,
  2. Yu Zhou and
  3. Hong Liu

State Key Laboratory of Drug Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201203, China

  1. Author email
  2. Corresponding author email

This article is part of the Thematic Series "Gold catalysis for organic synthesis".

Guest Editor: F. D. Toste
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2011, 7, 897–936.
Received 31 Mar 2011, Accepted 06 Jun 2011, Published 04 Jul 2011


C–O, C–N and C–C bonds are the most widespread types of bonds in nature, and are the cornerstone of most organic compounds, ranging from pharmaceuticals and agrochemicals to advanced materials and polymers. Cationic gold acts as a soft and carbophilic Lewis acid and is considered one of the most powerful activators of C–C multiple bonds. Consequently, gold-catalysis plays an important role in the development of new strategies to form these bonds in more convenient ways. In this review, we highlight recent advances in the gold-catalyzed chemistry of addition of X–H (X = O, N, C) bonds to C–C multiple bonds, tandem reactions, and asymmetric additions. This review covers gold-catalyzed organic reactions published from 2008 to the present.

Keywords: asymmetric addition; catalysis; gold; C−C multiple bonds; tandem reaction


1 Introduction

Gold-catalyzed reactions have emerged as a powerful synthetic tool in modern organic synthesis. This past decade has been the boom time for homogeneous gold catalysis, which was rather limited in organic synthesis until the advantages of gold complexes as catalysts were discovered [1]. In comparison to other transition-metal catalysts, most gold-catalyzed reactions are atom-economic, remarkably mild with regard to reaction conditions, and most importantly, have a different reaction scope [2-4].

One of the most important fundamental reactions in gold-catalyzed synthesis is the addition of X–H (X = O, N, C) bonds to C–C multiple bonds, which features diverse functional group tolerance and the easy formation of carbon–carbon and carbon–heteroatom bonds [1,4,5]. Furthermore, the rapid growing area of tandem reactions has allowed chemists to assemble diverse complex molecular frameworks more conveniently. Although various research efforts have led to gold-catalyzed addition reactions, the area of asymmetric addition has only recently been pioneered. Currently, a broad range of chiral gold catalysts (or gold combined with chiral ligands) has been developed and screened. However, only limited success has been achieved. The most notable example is the chiral BIPHEP-based catalyst, which has been successfully employed in several asymmetric cycloadditions.

Several early reviews have summarized well the progress of gold-catalyzed reactions up to 2008 [6-16]. Since then, the expansion of this field has continued unabated as evidenced by more than 500 publications to be found in the literature. Herein, we summarize the new research efforts that cover several aspects of gold-catalyzed additions to unsaturated bonds: (i) X–H (X = O, N, C) bonds to C–C multiple bonds; (ii) tandem reactions; and (iii) gold-catalyzed asymmetric additions. The literature published from 2008 up to the February of 2011 is covered. Only the most important recent studies have been selected to demonstrate the significance of gold catalysis.

2 Gold-catalyzed C–O bond formations

The carbon–oxygen bond is one of the most widespread types of bonds in nature. Gold catalytic addition of oxygen nucleophiles to electronically non-activated C–C multiple bonds represents an attractive approach to the synthesis of functionalized ethers and ketones. In particular, the intramolecular addition of oxygen nucleophile to C–C multiple bonds has become a very effective tool in the synthesis of oxygen heterocycles from readily available starting materials [11].

2.1 Alcohols, phenols and epoxides as nucleophiles

In general, dihydrofuran analogs can be constructed from alkynes by palladium-catalyzed intramolecular hydroalkoxylation reactions. However, the more common way to synthesize dihydrofurans is the gold catalyzed cyclization of vinyl allenols [17]. For instance, hydroxyallenic esters 1 can be selectively transformed into 2-alkyl- and 2-aryl-3-ethoxycarbonyl-2,5-dihydrofurans 2 by Ph3PAuCl and AgOTf through intramolecular hydroalkoxylation via a 5-endo mode [18]. Gold(III) chloride in catalytic amounts activates 3,4,6-tri-O-acetyl-D-glucal, 3,4,6-tri-O-acetyl-D-galactal, and 3,4-di-O-acetyl-L-rhamnal 3 efficiently. The activated species can be employed in the Ferrier reaction with different nucleophiles at ambient conditions to yield the unsaturated derivatives 4 (Scheme 1) [19].


Scheme 1: Gold-catalyzed addition of alcohols.

The intramolecular addition of a hydroxy group to a carbon–carbon triple bond is an effective strategy to construct furan analogues. Du et al. reported a highly efficient Au-catalyzed cyclization of (Z)-enynols that proceeded under mild reaction conditions. This methodology provided rapid access to substituted furans 6 and stereo-defined (Z)-5-ylidene-2,5-dihydrofurans 7 in a regioselective manner from suitably substituted (Z)-2-en-4-yn-1-ols 5 [20]. A similar strategy has been applied to an efficient formation of substituted furans 9 through gold-catalyzed selective cyclization of enyne-1,6-diols 8 [21]. Nucleophilic attack of the hydroxy oxygen atom on 1-position to a gold-coordinated C–C triple bond formed the vinyl–gold complex. Surprisingly, no other cyclic compound formed by nucleophilic attack of the hydroxy oxygen atom on C-6-position to a gold-coordinated C–C triple bond was formed. A new efficient route to furans 11 by gold-catalyzed intramolecular nucleophilic attack of readily available heteroatom-substituted propargyl alcohols 10 has been developed by Aponick and co-workers [22]. For the formation of tetrahydropyran analogs 13 and 15, the gold(I)-catalyzed cyclization of monoallylic diols 12 and 14 is an efficient method (Scheme 2) [23,24].


Scheme 2: Gold-catalyzed cycloaddition of alcohols.

In addition to common organic solvents, an attractive alternative is the use of ionic liquids as the reaction solvent, which often affords inexpensive, recyclable (and therefore environmentally benign), and sustainable catalyst systems. For example, Aksin et al. demonstrated that ionic liquids were highly suitable reaction media for the gold-catalyzed cycloisomerization of α-hydroxyallenes 16 to 2,5-dihydrofurans 17 (Scheme 3) [25]. The best system was found to be AuBr3 in [BMIM][PF6]. The cycloisomerization of various alkyl- or arylsubstituted α-hydroxyallenes gave corresponding 2,5-dihydrofuran with complete axis-to-center chirality transfer.


Scheme 3: Ionic liquids as the solvent in gold-catalyzed cycloaddition.

Rüttinger et al. reported a gold-catalyzed synthetic route for the preparation of enynes (Scheme 4) [26]. The gold-catalyzed cyclization provided the corresponding exo-enol ethers 19 in moderate to high yield with complete regioselectivity. By contrast, Wilckens et al. reported the gold-catalyzed endo-cyclizations of 1,4-diynes 20 to seven-membered ring heterocycles 21 [27]. The cyclization occurs exclusively in an endo-fashion under mild conditions and provides access to dihydrodioxepines and tetrahydrooxazepines.


Scheme 4: Gold-catalyzed cycloaddition of diynes.

The dioxabicyclo[4.2.1] ketal 23 and its further transformation product tetrahydropyran 24 were produced by an efficient gold(I) chloride catalyzed cycloisomerization of 2-alkynyl-1,5-diol 22 [28]. A plausible mechanism for the gold-catalyzed transformation of dioxabicyclo[4.2.1]ketal 25 to tetrahydropyran 31 is outlined in Scheme 5. The gold catalyst activates one of the oxygen atoms to form the intermediates 26 or 27, which then rearrange to yield the oxonium intermediates 28 or 29, respectively.


Scheme 5: Gold(I) chloride catalyzed cycloisomerization of 2-alkynyl-1,5-diols.

Gold(I)-catalyzed intramolecular cyclization of monopropargylic triols 32 has been reported to be a novel and mild approach [29] for producing olefin-containing spiroketals 33 (and enantiomer) in excellent yields (Scheme 6). A range of variously substituted triols was prepared which were cyclized to give substituted 5- and 6-membered ring spiroketals. Similarly, the synthesis of the bisbenz-annelated spiroketal core 35 of natural bioactive rubromycins via a gold-catalyzed double intramolecular hydroalkoxylation was reported by Zhang and co-workers [30]. A tandem cyclization mechanism was proposed by the authors.


Scheme 6: Gold-catalyzed cycloaddition of glycols and dihydroxy compounds.

The first example of gold-catalyzed ring-opening addition of cyclopropenes has been developed by Lee’s group [31,32]. The reaction of alkyl-disubstituted cyclopropene 36 with a series of alcohols generated the corresponding tert-allylic ethers 37 with high regioselectivity. Gold(I) catalysts were found to be unique and superior in terms of reactivity and regioselectivity. A notable observation in some of these studies is that gold(I) catalyzed rearrangement to furanones 39 and indenes 40 is observed upon introduction of ester and phenyl substituents on the cyclopropene (Scheme 7). AuPR3NTf2 complexes (PR3 = 41–45) are selective catalysts for the intermolecular hydroalkoxylation of electron-poor alkynes of type R−C≡C−EWG and dimethyl acetylenedicarboxylate [33]. In reactions of phenylacetylene the ratio of vinyl ether 47 to ketal 48 can be controlled by the choice of catalyst (Scheme 8).


Scheme 7: Gold-catalyzed ring-opening of cyclopropenes.


Scheme 8: Gold-catalyzed intermolecular hydroalkoxylation of alkynes. PR3 = 41–45.

The gold-catalyzed intramolecular 6-endo-dig cyclization of β-hydroxy-α,α-difluoroynones 50 under mild conditions has been developed (Scheme 9) [34]. The result indicated that gold catalysis is compatible with electrophilic fluorinating reagents. Furthermore, it is possible to couple the 6-endo-dig cyclization with iodination and bromination of the presumed vinyl–gold intermediate. However, attempted alkoxychlorination with N-chlorosuccinimide failed. Intermolecular hydroalkoxylation of non-activated olefins catalyzed by the combination of gold(I) and electron deficient phosphine ligands has been developed [35]. Gold-catalyzed hydroalkoxylations of non-activated olefins 52 and simple aliphatic alcohols 53 gave unsatisfactory results. However, a significant improvement of reaction efficiency was observed by employing alcohol substrates bearing coordination functionalities. In addition, the catalyst system with electron deficient phosphines was also found to catalyze the desired reaction effectively (Scheme 10).


Scheme 9: Gold-catalyzed intramolecular 6-endo-dig cyclization of β-hydroxy-α,α-difluoroynones.


Scheme 10: Gold-catalyzed intermolecular hydroalkoxylation of non-activated olefins.

An efficient approach [36] for the preparation of unsymmetrical ethers from alcohols has been developed by utilizing NaAuCl4. The benzylic and secondary alcohols (55 and 58) worked well under mild conditions with low catalyst loading (Scheme 11). The chiral benzyl alcohol 60 gave racemic ether 61, which suggested the intermediacy of a carbocation.


Scheme 11: Preparation of unsymmetrical ethers from alcohols.

Ye et al. reported an expedient gold-catalyzed synthesis of dihydrofuran-3-ones 63, in which terminal alkynes 62 were used as equivalents of α-diazo ketones to generate α-oxo gold carbenes (Scheme 12) [37]. The α-oxo gold carbenes were produced via gold-catalyzed intermolecular oxidation of 62. This provides improved synthetic flexibility in comparison with the intramolecular strategy and offers a safe and economical alternative to those based on diazo substrates.


Scheme 12: Expedient synthesis of dihydrofuran-3-ones.

A catalytic approach to functionalized divinyl ketones through a gold-catalyzed rearrangement of (3-acyloxyprop-1-ynyl)oxiranes 64 has also been developed [38]. The reaction proceeds via rearrangement of (3-acyloxyprop-1-ynyl)oxiranes to acyloxydivinyl ketones, migration of the adjacent acyloxy group, as well as cycloreversion of oxetene and provides easy access to a variety of acyloxyl divinyl ketones 65 (Scheme 13).


Scheme 13: Catalytic approach to functionalized divinyl ketones.

A number of interesting gold-catalyzed glycosylations have appeared in recent years. Ph3PAuOTf is reported to be a superior catalyst (yield increases by >20%) compared to conventionally used ZnCl2 for the well-established glycosylation reaction with 1,2-anhydrosugars 66 as donors (Scheme 14) [39]. The gold(I)-catalyzed reaction of 2,3,4,6-tetra-O-acetyl-α-D-galactopyranosyl trichloroacetimidate (68) with alcohols gave β-galactosides 69 stereoselectively and in much higher yields compared to those obtained with 2,3,4,6-tetra-O-acetyl-α-D-galactopyranosyl bromide [40]. Subsequently, a method to activate the propargyl 1,2-orthoesters 70 selectively in the presence of propargyl glycosides and propargyl ethers was developed [41]. Recently, Li et al. reported the gold(I)-catalyzed glycosylation with glycosyl ortho-alkynylbenzoates 73 as donors [42]. This glycosylation protocol was used in an efficient synthesis of a cyclic triterpene tetrasaccharide 74, which demonstrated its versatility and efficacy. Another study [43] showed that 1,6-anhydro sugars 76 and 78 could be synthesized by utilizing salient features of gold-catalyzed glycosidations.


Scheme 14: Gold-catalyzed glycosylation.

2.2 Aldehydes and ketones as nucleophiles

Different oxygen heterocycles can be obtained from the gold-catalyzed cyclization of alk-4-yn-1-ones 79 depending on the substitution pattern in the substrate and the reaction solvent. Thus, alkynones with one substituent at C-3 undergo a 5-exo-dig cycloisomerization to yield substituted furans 81, whilst substrates bearing two substituents at C-3 undergo a 6-endo-dig cyclization to give 4H-pyrans 82. By contrast, alkylidene/benzylidene-substituted tetrahydrofuranyl ethers 80 are formed in a tandem nucleophilic addition/cycloisomerization in alcoholic solvents [44]. Similarly, Belot et al. reported a gold-catalyzed cyclization which led to nitro-substituted tetrahydrofuranyl ethers 84 (Scheme 15) [45].


Scheme 15: Gold-catalyzed cycloaddition of aldehydes and ketones.

Liu et al. have developed a facile synthesis of benzochromanes 86 and benzobicycloacetals 87 from the gold-catalyzed cascade annulations of 2-(ynol)aryl aldehydes 85 [46]. Benzochromanes were obtained when AuCl3 was employed as the catalyst, whereas benzobicyclo[5.3.1]acetals 87 were produced when triazole–gold was employed as the catalyst. With alcohol nucleophiles, gold(I)-catalyzed cyclization of o-alkynyl benzaldehyde 88 and benzaldimine–chromium complexes gave stereoselectively 1-anti-functionalized heterocycle chromium complexes 89 (Scheme 16) [47]. This made the methodology useful for the synthesis of enantiomerically pure trans- and cis-1,3-dimethylisochromans starting from a single planar chiral chromium complex.


Scheme 16: Gold-catalyzed annulations of 2-(ynol)aryl aldehydes and o-alkynyl benzaldehydes.

2.3 Carboxylates as nucleophiles

Seraya has reported the gold-catalyzed rearrangement of cyclopropenylmethyl acetates as a route to (Z)-acetoxydienes [48]. Thus, treatment of 4-nitrobenzaldehyde derived cyclopropene 90 with a catalytic amount of PPh3AuNTf2 in DCM led to quantitative formation of acetoxy diene 91 with a 4:1 Z:E selectivity within 5 min at −50 °C. Wang et al. developed an efficient method for the preparation of polysubstituted C–vinyl butyrolactones through a gold-catalyzed highly diastereoselective cyclization of malonate substituted allylic acetates [49]. As an example, treatment of syn-4-acetoxycyclohexenyl malonate 92 with a catalytic amount of AuPPh3Cl/AgSbF6 in DCE at 70 °C for 3 h led to the isolation of 3,4-anti-4,5-syn-3-methoxycarbonyltetrahydrobenzobutyrolactone 93 in 80% yield. The possible intermediate is shown in Scheme 17. Using the AuPPh3Cl/AgOTf system as the equivalent of AuPPh3OTf, Liu et al. found that the in situ generated cationic Au(I) reagent reacted with ethyl α-methyl-γ-cyclohexyl allenoate in dichloromethane at room temperature to form the gold complex 96 in 85% yield (Scheme 17) [50]. This result could provide the experimental evidence required to support the postulated mechanism of Au-catalyzed reactions.


Scheme 17: Gold-catalyzed addition of carboxylates.

Dual-catalyzed rearrangement reactions have been reported by Shi and co-workers for the preparation of substituted butenolides 101 and isocoumarins [51]. In this study, the authors employed a carbophilic Lewis acidic Au(I) catalyst to catalyze the cross-coupling reactivity of a second Lewis basic Pd catalyst in order to functionalize vinyl–gold intermediates arising from intramolecular substrate rearrangements (Scheme 18).


Scheme 18: Dual-catalyzed rearrangement reaction of allenoates.

2.4 Propargylic alcohols and propargylic carboxylate rearrangements

Pennell et al. reported Meyer–Schuster rearrangements of propargylic alcohols 102 at room temperature in toluene with 1–2 mol % PPh3AuNTf2, in the presence of 0.2 equiv of 4-methoxyphenylboronic acid or 1 equiv of methanol [52]. Mechanistically, it was proposed that the enones 103 were produced through two pathways (Scheme 19).


Scheme 19: Meyer–Schuster rearrangement of propargylic alcohols.

The gold(I)-catalyzed rearrangement of propargylic tert-butyl carbonates gave diversely substituted 4-alkylidene-1,3-dioxolan-2-ones 115 [53]. For example, treatment of propargylic tert-butyl carbonate 114 with 1 mol % PPh3AuNTf2 in CH2Cl2 at room temperature led to isolation of the cyclic carbonate in 83% yield. Syntheses of oxetan-3-ones typically demand multiple synthetic steps and/or highly functionalized substrates. Alternatively, Ye et al. [54] developed a practical gold-catalyzed one-step synthesis of oxetan-3-ones 117 and 119 from readily available propargylic alcohols 116 and 118. Since chiral propargylic alcohols are readily available, this methodology provides easy access to chiral oxetan-3-ones. For example, the reaction of enantiomerically enriched secondary propargyl alcohols led to the chiral oxetan-3-one with no apparent racemization (Scheme 20).


Scheme 20: Propargylic alcohol rearrangements.

3 Gold-catalyzed C–N bond formations

Many organic compounds containing nitrogen exhibit important biological and pharmaceutical properties. As with gold-catalyzed C–O bond formation, the directly catalytic addition of a nitrogen nucleophile to a C–C multiple bond represents an attractive approach to the formation of C–N bonds [55]. This is a direct and efficient procedure for the synthesis of nitrogen containing compounds of industrial importance.

3.1 Alkyl- and aromatic amines as nucleophiles

Imines and oximes are versatile synthetic intermediates for the preparation of dyes, pharmaceuticals, and agricultural chemicals. Sun et al. have reported a multi-task Au/hydroxyapatite reagent for the heterogeneous catalyzed oxidation of alcohols and amines to imines or oximes [56]. N-alkylation of primary amines is an important reaction in organic synthesis. He et al. developed an efficient gold-catalyzed one-pot selective N-alkylation of amines with alcohols [57]. In their study, gold nanoparticles supported on titania act as an efficient heterogeneous catalyst for the reaction to give the N-alkylated amines in excellent yields (Scheme 21).


Scheme 21: Gold-catalyzed synthesis of imines and amine alkylation.

Zeng and co-workers reported that cationic gold(I) complexes promote the addition of all types of non-tertiary amines 120 to a variety of allenes 121 to afford allylic amines 122 in good to excellent yields [58]. Importantly, the Markovnikov adduct was obtained in all cases. A similar Markovnikov hydroamination [59] could also be achieved via an intermolecular hydroamination of allenamides 123 with arylamines under mild AuPPh3OTf catalysis conditions to furnish allylamino (E)-enamides stereoselectively (Scheme 22).


Scheme 22: Hydroamination of allenes and allenamides.

Hesp and co-workers have identified a gold pre-catalyst 125 featuring a P,N-ligand that has significantly extended the substrate scope and synthetic utility of alkyne hydroamination [60]. The hydroamination of unsymmetrical internal aryl acetylenes 126 with dialkylamines 127 has been achieved with synthetically useful regioselectivities. In addition to intermolecular addition, Mukherjee and Widenhoefer recently reported a gold(I)-catalyzed intramolecular amination of allylic alcohols 130 with alkylamines (Scheme 23) [61].


Scheme 23: Gold-catalyzed inter- and intramolecular amination of alkynes and alkenes.

3.2 Imines as nucleophiles

Gold-catalyzed cyclizations of O-propioloyl oximes via C–N bond formation followed by arylidene group transfer were developed as a method for the preparation of 4-arylidene isoxazol-5(4H)-ones [62]. For example, (E)-benzaldehyde O-3-phenylpropioloyl oxime 132 was reacted in acetonitrile at 25 °C in the presence of AuPPh3NTf2 (5 mol %) to give 4-benzylidene-3-phenylisoxazol-5(4H)-one 133 in 90% yield. An efficient synthesis of multi-substituted N-aminopyrroles 135 via gold(I)-catalyzed cyclization of β-allenylhydrazones 134 was developed by Benedetti and co-workers (Scheme 24) [63]. This intramolecular cyclization method can be applied to both alkyl- or aryl-substituted allenes and involves mild conditions and short reaction times.


Scheme 24: Gold-catalyzed cycloisomerization of O-propioloyl oximes and β-allenylhydrazones.

3.3 Amides, sulfamides and ureas as nucleophiles

Using AuPPh3Cl/Ag2CO3-catalyzed 5-endo-dig cyclization in water under microwave irradiation, our group developed a fast and green route to prepare indole-1-carboxamides 137 from N'-substituted N-(2-alkynylphenyl)ureas 136 (Scheme 25) [64]. A variety of functional groups including N'-aryl, alkyl, heterocyclic, various N-substituted-2-ethynylphenyl and N-(2-ethynylpyridin-3-yl)ureas, are tolerated and gives moderate to high yields of the desired products.


Scheme 25: Intra- and intermolecular amination with ureas.

In another study [65], bicyclic imidazolidin-2-ones 139 were obtained via gold(I)-catalyzed intramolecular dihydroamination of allenes with N,N′-disubstituted ureas 138. Iglesias et al. reported a complimentary diamination of alkenes 140 with homogeneous gold catalysts [66]. The key step is an intramolecular alkyl–nitrogen bond formation from a gold(III) intermediate. Besides the intramolecular addition of ureas, Widenhoefer’s group reported a gold(I)-catalyzed intermolecular amination of allylic alcohols 143 with cyclic ureas 142 (Scheme 25) [67].

Gold-catalyzed reactions of ortho-alkynyl-N-sulfonylanilines 146 produced the corresponding 3-sulfonylindoles in good to high yields (Scheme 26). Nakamura and co-workers synthesized 3-mesyl-1-methyl-2-propylindole 147, 3-mesyl-1-methyl-2-phenylindole 148, and 3-mesyl-1-methylindole 149 from N-mesyl-N-methyl-2-(1-pentynyl)aniline, N-mesyl-N-methyl-2-(phenylethynyl)aniline, and 2-ethynyl-N-mesyl-N-ethylaniline in moderate to high yield with AuBr3 as the catalyst [68]. Surmont and co-workers later explored a similar strategy for the synthesis of 2-aryl-3-fluoropyrroles 151 [69]. Gouault et al. reported a gold-catalyzed approach to synthesize substituted pyrrolin-4-ones 153 from 1-aminobut-3-yn-2-one analogs 152 under mild conditions [70]. The use of gold(III) oxide as catalyst allows moderate to total stereo control during the cyclization.


Scheme 26: Gold-catalyzed cyclization of ortho-alkynyl-N-sulfonylanilines and but-3-yn-1-amines.

Huang et al. has developed an efficient gold-catalyzed method to access piperidinyl enol esters 155 and piperidinyl ketones 156 under mild reaction conditions from ε-N-protected propargylic esters 154 [71]. This intramolecular piperidine cyclization methodology shows different reactivity and substrate applicability compared with the former intermolecular nucleophilic addition. The mechanism speculated by the authors involves a gold-catalyzed intramolecular rearrangement followed by nucleophilic attack of the Boc-protected nitrogen atom. A similar method to synthesize the 2-vinylpiperidin-3-ol 158 by a highly stereoselective gold-catalyzed allene cyclization has been reported (Scheme 27) [72].


Scheme 27: Gold-catalyzed piperidine ring synthesis.

The ring expansion of cyclopropane derivatives provides a powerful method to construct synthetically useful four-membered carbocycles. Ye et al. reported a new type of gold(I)-catalyzed ring expansion of an non-activated alkynylcyclopropane/sulfonamide to obtain (E)-2-alkylidenecyclobutanamines [73]. For example, treatment of alkynylcyclopropane 159 with TsNH2 and 5 mol % PPh3AuCl/5 mol % AgOTf in dichloroethane at 80 °C gave alkylidenecyclobutanamine 160 in 65% yield as a single olefin isomer (Scheme 28).


Scheme 28: Ring expansion of alkylnyl cyclopropanes.

The formation of tri- and tetrasubstituted pyrroles 163 [74] via cationic N-heterocyclic carbene–gold(I) complex catalyzed amino Claisen rearrangement of N-propargyl-β-enaminone derivatives 161 and the cyclization of α-allenyl-β-enaminone intermediates has been developed by Saito and co-workers (Scheme 29) [75]. Toste’s group has reported a novel gold(III)-catalyzed [3 + 3]-annulation of azomethine imines 165 with propargyl esters 164. Substitution of the β-position of the pyrazolidinone generally provides the bicyclic product 166 with high cis selectivity, which is determined during ring closing rather than in the formation of allyl–gold intermediate [76].


Scheme 29: Gold-catalyzed annulations of N-propargyl-β-enaminones and azomethine imines.

Gold-catalyzed cycloisomerization reaction of alkynyl aziridines 167 can give 2,5-disubstituted pyrroles 168 in high yields [77]. However, in some cases, aryl-substituted N-tosyl alkynyl aziridines 169 undergo a gold-catalyzed ring expansion to afford 2,5-substituted or 2,4-substituted pyrrole products [78]. Interestingly, the reaction pathway is determined by the counter ion of the gold catalyst. The formation of 2,5-substituted pyrroles 170 proceeds with PPh3AuOTs as the catalyst whilst a novel reaction pathway is accessed on changing the catalyst system to PPh3AuOTf and leads to 2,4-substituted pyrroles 171. Recently, the same group reported an efficient and selective synthesis of 2,5-substituted pyrroles 173 by gold-catalyzed ring expansion of alkynyl aziridines 172 [79]. In this study a combination of Ph3PAuCl and AgOTs generates a catalyst system that provides clean cycloisomerisation reactions. Similarly, N-Phth pyrrroles 175 are obtained via gold-catalyzed cycloisomerization of N-Phth alkynyl aziridines 174 (Scheme 30) [80].


Scheme 30: Gold(I)-catalyzed cycloisomerization of aziridines.

Chan’s group developed an efficient synthetic route to 1,2-dihydroquinolines 177 via AuCl3/AgSbF6-catalyzed intramolecular allylic amination of 2-(tosylamino)phenylprop-1-en-3-ols 176 (Scheme 31) [81]. The mechanism is suggested to involve activation of the alcohol substrate by the AuCl3/AgSbF6 catalyst and ionization of the starting material, which causes intramolecular nucleophilic addition of the sulfonamide unit to the allylic cation moiety and construction of a 1,2-dihydroquinoline.


Scheme 31: AuCl3/AgSbF6-catalyzed intramolecular amination of 2-(tosylamino)phenylprop-1-en-3-ols.

Our group also discovered that a regioselective hydroamidation of 2-(1-alkynyl)phenylacetamides 178 could be achieved with AuPPh3Cl/AgSbF6 as the catalyst and gave 3-benzazepin-2-ones 180 via 7-endo-dig pathway [82]. Moreover, a AuBr3-mediated transformation of 2-(1-alkynyl)phenylacetamides 178 to 5-bromo-3-benzazepin-2-ones 179 was discovered, which indicated that the gold catalyst not only played an activation role but also acted as a reactant in the reaction (Scheme 32).


Scheme 32: Gold-catalyzed cyclization via a 7-endo-dig pathway.

A simple, convenient, and green synthetic approach to diverse fused xanthines 182 has also been developed by gold-complex catalyzed intramolecular hydroamination of terminal alkynes 181 under microwave irradiation in aqueous media (Scheme 33). This transformation is atom-economical and has high functional group tolerance [83].


Scheme 33: Gold-catalyzed synthesis of fused xanthines.

3.4 Nitriles and nitrines as nucleophiles

Ibrahim et al. reported a new and mild method for the synthesis of amide 184 from readily available benzhydrol 183 and nitriles catalyzed by a gold(I)-complex with a trimesitylene ligand [84]. Mechanistic control experiments with chiral alcohol 185 prove the intermediacy of carbenium ions. Further studies with not readily ionizable alcohols also indicate that for the benzhydrols the carbenium ions and gold(I)-hydroxy complexes are intermediates (Scheme 34). Yamamoto’s group reported that intramolecular cyclization of 2-alkynylbenzyl azides 187 in the presence of AuCl3 and AgSbF6 in THF under pressure at 100 °C gives the corresponding isoquinolines 188 in good yields [85].


Scheme 34: Gold-catalyzed synthesis of amides and isoquinolines.

4 Gold-catalyzed C–C bond formations

The formation of carbon–carbon bonds by using various transition metals such as Pd, Ni, Ru, Rh has been extensively investigated and is well documented in the literature. Recent years have witnessed a tremendous growth in the number of gold-catalyzed highly selective chemical transformations. Although gold was considered to be an inert metal for a long time, its ability to behave as a soft Lewis acid has only been recently recognized. Such a property allows it to activate unsaturated functionalities such as alkynes, alkenes, and allenes, to create C–C bonds under extremely mild conditions [15].

4.1 Intermolecular coupling

An unprecedented homogeneous gold-catalyzed oxidative cross-coupling which leads to α-arylenones 190 from propargylic acetates 189 and arylboronic acids has been developed by Zhang’s group (Scheme 35) [86]. This cross-coupling reaction reveals the synthetic potential of Au(I)/Au(III) catalytic cycles.


Scheme 35: Gold-catalyzed oxidative cross-coupling reactions of propargylic acetates.

Kimber reported a facile and mild synthesis of enamides (193196) by a gold-catalyzed nucleophilic addition to allenamides 191 (Scheme 36) [87]. For example, treatment of allenamide and 1-methylindole with 5.0 mol % of PPh3AuNTf2 in CH2Cl2 at room temperature gave the corresponding enamide in 83% yield.


Scheme 36: Gold-catalyzed nucleophilic addition to allenamides.

Gold-catalyzed direct carbon–carbon bond coupling reactions have been less explored [88,89]. In 2008, Li et al. reported a gold(I) iodide catalyzed Sonogashira reaction [88]. Terminal alkynes 197 reacted smoothly with aryl iodides and bromides 198 in the presence of 1 mol % AuI and 1 mol % dppf to generate the corresponding cross-coupling products 199 in good to excellent yields (Scheme 37). Another direct carbon–carbon bond coupling reaction was reported by Tarselli and co-workers [90]. In their study, the addition of nucleophilic methoxyarenes 200 to allenes 201 proceeded at room temperature in dichloromethane with a catalytic amount of phosphite–gold(I) pre-catalyst and a silver additive. Notably, the addition is regioselective for the allene terminus, and generates (E)-allylation products 202.


Scheme 37: Gold-catalyzed direct carbon–carbon bond coupling reactions.

The direct C–H functionalization of indoles or pyrroles is an efficient method for the introduction of vinyl and aryl groups. A gold-catalyzed direct alkynylation of indole and pyrrole heterocycles 204 with a benziodoxolone-based hypervalent iodine reagent 203 has been developed [91]. The functional group tolerance was greatly increased when compared with direct alkynylation of indoles reported previously. Kar et al. reported a general gold-catalyzed direct oxidative homo-coupling of non-activated arenes 207 (Scheme 38). The reaction protocol tolerates a wide range of functional groups [92]. All halogens survive the reaction, which provides the potential for further reactions.


Scheme 38: Gold-catalyzed C−H functionalization of indole/pyrrole heterocycles and non-activated arenes.

4.2 Rearrangements and ring enlargement

A gold-catalyzed rearrangement of 6-alkynylbicyclo[3.1.0]hexen-2-enes 209 has been developed [93]. In this reaction, divergent structural rearrangements are observed in the absence/presence of nucleophiles. The process results in a novel five-to-six-membered ring expansion that involves cleavage of the bridging C–C bond and a formal [1,2]-alkynyl shift. Li et al. reported the first gold-catalyzed reaction of propargylcyclopropene systems 212 which affords benzene derivatives 213 in high yields [94] (Scheme 39).


Scheme 39: Gold-catalyzed cycloisomerization of cyclic compounds.

Only few efficient methods have emerged for the synthesis of cyclobutane derivatives, which are important structural units in several natural products. Li et al. reported a novel gold-catalyzed oxidative ring-expansion of non-activated cyclopropylalkynes using Ph2SO as an oxidant [95]. Various alkynylcyclopropane derivatives 214 have been converted to cyclobutenyl ketones 215 in moderate to high yields under optimal conditions. Zou et al. has developed a versatile approach to 5-, 6-, and 7-membered carbocycles via the gold-catalyzed cycloisomerization of cyclopropyl alkynyl acetates [96]. The homo-Rautenstrauch rearrangement of 1-cyclopropylpropargylic esters 216 gave cyclohexenones 217 under mild conditions. Toste’s group reported a gold(I)-catalyzed sequential cycloisomerization/sp3 C–H bond functionalization (Scheme 39) of 1,5-enynes 218 and 1,4-enallenes to yield tetracyclododecane 219 and tetracyclotridecane derivatives, respectively [97]. These transformations represent rare examples of sp3 C–H bond insertion via a cationic gold(I)–carbenoid intermediate.

4.3 Cycloadditions

Intramolecular [M + N]-type cycloaddition reactions are powerful tools for accessing complex molecular frameworks [98]. Several gold-catalyzed [3 + 2] [99], [4 + 2] [100-105], and [4 + 3] [106-108] cycloaddition reactions have been developed in last 3 years. Treatment of 1-aryl-1-allen-6-enes 220 with [PPh3AuCl]/AgSbF6 (5 mol %) in CH2Cl2 at 25 °C led to intramolecular [3 + 2] cycloadditions to afford cis-fused dihydrobenzo[a]fluorenes 221 efficiently and selectively [99]. As pointed out by the researchers, the reactions proceeded with the initial formation of trans/cis mixtures of 2-alkyl-1-isopropyl-2-phenyl-1,2-dihydronaphthalene cations, which were converted into the desired cis-fused cycloadducts through the combined action of a gold catalyst and a Brønsted acid. Gung and co-workers developed a 3,3-rearrangement/transannular [4 + 3] cycloaddition reaction (Scheme 40) in the presence of either a Au(I) or Au(III) catalyst [109]. In these reactions, the regiochemistry of the product 223 is controlled by the position of the acetoxy group in the starting material 222, while the stereochemistry of the reaction depends on the ring size.


Scheme 40: Gold-catalyzed cycloaddition of 1-aryl-1-allen-6-enes and propargyl acetates.

In some gold(I)-catalyzed cycloaddition reactions, regiochemistry of the product is controlled by the ligand [100,101]. For example, the triphenylphosphinegold(I)-catalyzed reaction of allene–diene 224 provided a 2:1 mixture of the [4 + 3] and [4 + 2] cycloadducts (225 and 226) [101]. The selectivity was improved to 96:4 in favor of the [4 + 3] cycloadduct when di-tert-butylbiphenylphosphinegold(I) was employed as the catalyst. On the other hand, the use of arylphosphitegold(I) complexes exclusively produced the formal [4 + 2] cycloaddition product in very good yield (Scheme 41).


Scheme 41: Gold(I)-catalyzed cycloaddition with ligand-controlled regiochemistry.

Enynes [110-116], diynes [117-120], allenynes [121-128], and dienes [129-131] are common substrates for intramolecular cycloaddition reactions.

Porcel et al. found that cationic Au(I) complexes are the most efficient catalysts for the intramolecular coupling of allyl acetates with allylstannanes (compound 227) [129]. Zhu and co-workers reported a gold-catalyzed carbocyclization of dienyl acetates 229 to construct multi-functionalized 3-vinylcyclohexanol derivatives 230 [130]. The reaction proceeded through the nucleophilic addition of the alkene to the allylic cation via a 6-endo-trig process. The structure of the substrate affected the configurational orientation of the allylic cation in a boat-like transition state, which led to either trans-cyclohexanols or cis-piperidine derivatives. Some functionalized carbo- and heterocycles 232 were synthesized via gold-catalyzed cycloisomerization reactions of enynes 231 [110]. The PPh3AuCl/AgSbF6 catalytic system promotes a Friedel–Crafts type addition of electron-rich aromatic and heteroaromatic derivatives to the non-activated alkene followed by a C–C bond cyclization reaction. The carbon, oxygen and nitrogen tethered 1,6-enynes react smoothly with methoxy substituted benzenes, indoles, pyrroles and furans as nucleophilic partners (Scheme 42). The cycloisomerization reactions of boronated enynes 233 was achieved with gold(I) complexes generated from a mixture of gold and silver salts [111]. Both, alkynyl and alkenyl pinacol boronates were tolerated. The ratio of the different endo- and exo-products was heavily dependent on the position of the boronate functionality (Scheme 42).


Scheme 42: Gold(I)-catalyzed cycloaddition of dienes and enynes.

Li et al. reported a gold-catalyzed benzannulation of 3-alkoxy-1,5-enynes 236 to produce functionalized benzenes 237 [112]. The reaction occurs selectively through a 6-endo-dig pathway to give tri- and tetrasubstituted benzenes efficiently. Cyclization reactions of 1,6-diynes (2,2-dipropargylmalonates 238) could be achieved with gold(I) catalysts. Disubstituted 1,6-diynes furnished the (Z)-cyclopentylidene derivative 239 stereoselectively [117]. Monosubstituted terminal diyne afforded the cyclopentene derivative 240, while the diterminal 1,6-diyne produced a cyclohexenone derivative 241 (Scheme 43).


Scheme 43: Gold-catalyzed intramolecular cycloaddition of 3-alkoxy-1,5-enynes and 2,2-dipropargylmalonates.

Cheong and co-workers demonstrated that 1,5-allenynes 242 could be transformed to cross-conjugated trienes 243 via rearrangement with [(Ph3PAu)3O]BF4 as the catalyst [121]. Computational results indicated that the ene-reaction proceeded through a unique nucleophilic addition of an allene double bond to a cationic phosphine-gold(I)-complexed phosphine-gold(I) acetylide, followed by a 1,5-hydrogen shift (Scheme 44).


Scheme 44: Gold-catalyzed intramolecular cycloaddition of 1,5-allenynes.

A range of indole based cycloaddition products were obtained by concerting the initial regioselective site-selective indole attack (C3 position) to the C–C multiple bonds [132-134]. In the case of gold(I)-catalyzed reactions initiated by 1,2-indole migrations [132], the starting material, indole 247, was converted to an intermediate with [AuNTf2(Ph3P)]. Intramolecular attack of the indole on the activated alkyne gives the vinyl–gold complex, which is transformed into the gold carbene complex through a 1,2-migration of the indole. Further intramolecular nucleophilic attack of the phenyl group on the carbene carbon center, followed by a re-aromatization step and subsequent protodemetalation, affords 248 as the final product. Treatment of N-tethered 2,3-butadienyl-1H-indole 249 with di-tert-butyl(o-biphenyl)phosphine and AuNTf2 led to 6-endo cyclization [133]. The methodology was applied in a direct synthesis of the relevant 6,9-dihydropyrido[1,2-a]-1H-indole core 250. A similar strategy was adopted by Ferrer and co-workers [134], who prepared the 1H-azocino[5,4-b]indole skeleton 252 of the lundurines by the 8-endo-dig cyclization of the alkynylindole 251 using gold(III) chloride as the catalyst (Scheme 45).


Scheme 45: Gold(I)-catalyzed cycloaddition of indoles.

Electron-rich arenes are, in some cases, good nucleophiles [135,136]. An interesting gold-catalyzed electrophilic addition to an arylalkyne for the synthesis of substituted naphthalenes 255 has been developed [137]. Tarselli et al. reported a gold(I)-catalyzed intramolecular hydroarylation of allenes [138]. Gold(I) complexes react with 4-allenylarenes 256 in an exo fashion to furnish vinyl-substituted benzocycles 257. Interestingly, if 1-arylbuta-2,3-dienyl acetate 258 was used as the substrate, naphthalenes 259 are formed through a AuPPh3Cl catalyzed cyclization reaction [139]. Using gold complex [XPhosAu(NCCH3)SbF6] as the catalyst, Jurberg and Gagosz prepared the cinnoline derivatives 261 by the hydroarylation of N-propargyl-N-arylhydrazines 260 [140]. With the gold complex [Mes3PAu]NTf2, an alkynyl ether moiety triggered a new reaction mode of furan–yne cyclization and delivered a new class of tetracyclic system 263 rather than a phenol (Scheme 46) [141].


Scheme 46: Gold-catalyzed annulation reactions.

Insertion of a C–H bond into a metal–carbenoid is a highly useful method for forming a new carbon–carbon bond. An atypical gold–carbenoid induced cleavage of a sp3-hybridized C–H bond can be achieved by undergoing 1,3-addition to a vinyl–carbenoid intermediate [142]. The bicyclo[3.2.1]oct-6-en-2-ones 265 and 267 could be synthesized stereoselectively by this method. Deuterium labeling experiments indicated the cyclization involved an unprecedented 1,3-addition of a sp3-hybridized C–H bond to the vinyl–carbenoid moiety (Scheme 47).


Scheme 47: Gold–carbenoid induced cleavage of a sp3-hybridized C−H bond.

5 Gold-catalyzed tandem reactions

Tandem catalysis refers to the synthetic strategies of modular combination of catalytic reactions into one synthetic operation with minimum workup or change in conditions [143]. The gold-catalyzed tandem reactions have allowed chemists to assemble diverse complex molecular frameworks more conveniently.

5.1 Sequential inter-and intramolecular reactions

Phenanthrenyl ketones are very important subunits in material science and also occur in numerous natural products. A gold-catalyzed cascade Friedel–Crafts/furan–yne cyclization/heteroenyne metathesis was developed for the highly efficient construction of phenanthrene derivatives 270 [144]. Both AuCl3 and PPh3AuCl are effective catalysts for all the processes in the reaction and a variety of diyne substrates 271 could be used (Scheme 48). Similar strategies [145,146] were applied to synthesize arylated (Z)-enones, -enals or dihydrocyclohepta[b]indole skeletons 277 by gold-catalyzed cascade Friedel–Crafts/furan (or indole)–alkyne cycloisomerizations (Scheme 48).


Scheme 48: Furan- and indole-based cascade reactions.

The polysubstituted butenolides 281 could be obtained through a gold-catalyzed multi-component tandem reaction that involved novel direct alkyne 279–amine 280–glyoxylic acid (278) coupling, intramolecular cyclization of α-N-substituted β-alkynoic acid, and subsequent reaction (Scheme 49) [147].


Scheme 49: Tandem process using aromatic alkynes.

An intermolecular hetero-dehydro-Diels–Alder reaction between captodative 1,3-dien-5-ynes 282 and non-activated nitriles was introduced by Barluenga and co-workers [148]. The sequence is promoted by both, gold(I) and gold(III) catalysts and leads to the regioselective formation of tetrasubstituted pyridines 289. The initial coordination of the triple bond to the gold catalyst forms intermediate 284, followed by the regioselective nucleophilic attack of the nitrile, leading to the formation of 285. Cyclization may occur through resonance structure 286 or 287 followed by final metal de-coordination (Scheme 50).


Scheme 50: Gold-catalyzed cycloaddition of 1,3-dien-5-ynes.

5.2 Sequential intramolecular reactions

Sequential intramolecular reactions result in the formation of multi-ring products from a single substrate [149]. In 2010, a concise synthetic method for the generation of fused indoles (291293), by a gold-catalyzed cascade cyclization of diynes 290 was developed by Hirano and co-workers [150]. The reaction gave aryl annulated[a]carbazoles, dihydrobenzo[g]indoles, and azepino- or oxepinoindole derivatives through an intramolecular cascade 5-endo-dig hydroamination followed by a 6- or 7-endo-dig cycloisomerization. Dudnik et al. reported a gold(I)-catalyzed cycloisomerization of propargylic esters 294 which led to unsymmetrically substituted naphthalenes 296 [151]. This cascade reaction involves a tandem sequence of 1,3- and 1,2-migration of two different migrating groups. Jin and Yamamoto prepared the fused tri- and tetracyclic enones 298 through an efficient gold(III)-catalyzed tandem reaction, heteroenyne metathesis, and Nazarov cyclization of 1,3-enynyl ketones 297 [152]. The gold(III) catalyst exhibits dual roles for activating both the alkyne and carbonyl moieties (Scheme 51).


Scheme 51: Gold-catalyzed cascade cyclization of diynes, propargylic esters, and 1,3-enynyl ketones.

More recently, Liu et al. developed a gold(III)-catalyzed tandem rearrangement/cyclization reaction of β-phenoxyimino ketone 299 (produced from O-arylhydroxylamines with 1,3-dicarbonyl compounds in situ) to give 3-carbonylated benzofuran derivatives 300 [153]. Trisubstituted isoxazoles 303 were obtained from alkynyl oxime ether 301 through a gold-catalyzed domino reaction involving cyclization and subsequent Claisen-type rearrangement [154]. The presence of additional substituents on the allyl moiety required an increase in catalyst loading and a prolonged reaction time for complete consumption of the substrate (Scheme 52).


Scheme 52: Tandem reaction of β-phenoxyimino ketones and alkynyl oxime ethers.

Liu and Zhang have developed a gold-catalyzed region-divergent tandem cationic cyclization/ring expansion terminated by a pinacol rearrangement to produce naphthalen-2(1H)-ones or naphthalenes 305, 307, 309, and 311 selectively (Scheme 53) [155]. The synthesis of indole 313 [156] and tricyclic dihydroindenofuranone-type product 315 from 2-(tosylamino)phenylprop-1-yn-3-ol 312 [157] and allenoates 314 [158], respectively, has been reported (Scheme 53). The latter is the first example of a gold-catalyzed intramolecular C–C cross-coupling reaction involving aryl C–H functionalization with Selectfluor® as the oxidant.


Scheme 53: Gold-catalyzed tandem cyclization of enynes, 2-(tosylamino)phenylprop-1-yn-3-ols, and allenoates.

2,4-Dien-6-ynecarboxylic acids 316 undergo gold-catalyzed tandem 1,6-cyclization/decarboxylation to afford 2,3-disubstituted phenols (318321) and unsymmetrical bi- and terphenyls (Scheme 54) [159]. The reaction is greatly affected by the electronic properties of dienyne acid. The regioselective 1,6-cyclization/decarboxylation sequence only takes place when a strong electron-donating group is not directly linked to the triple bond.


Scheme 54: Cyclization of 2,4-dien-6-yne carboxylic acids.

Liu et al. has developed two highly stereoselective cationic gold(I)-catalyzed tandem cyclization reactions of alkynylindoles 322 [160]. The reaction proceeds with remarkable retention of chirality and allows the efficient enantioselective synthesis of polycyclic indolines 327 from the corresponding enantiomerically enriched alkynylindole 326 (Scheme 55).


Scheme 55: Gold(I)-catalyzed tandem cyclization approach to tetracyclic indolines.

5.3 Sequential intra-and intermolecular reactions

In an attempt to devise an efficient synthesis of potential bioactive fused heterocyles, our group developed a highly efficient, [Au{P(t-Bu)2(o-biphenyl)}{CH3CN}]SbF6-catalyzed cascade cycloisomerization to produce pyrrolo/pyrido[2,1-b]benzo[d][1,3]oxazin-1-ones 330 [161], pyrrolo/pyrido[2,1-a][1,3]benzoxazinones 332 [162], benzo[e]indolo[1,2-a]-pyrrolo[2,1-c][1,4]diazepine-3,9-diones 335 [163], and fused quinoxalinones 337 [164]. These cascades are proposed to occur from an initial enol lactone intermediate via an intramolecular cycloaddition [165]. A subsequent intermolecular hydroamination of the intermediate, followed by a cyclization, leads to the observed products. Our group also investigated the construction of highly functionalized pyrrolo[1,2-a]quinolin-1(2H)-ones 340 via a AuBr3/AgSbF6-catalyzed cascade transformation sequence (Scheme 56). The strategy affords a straightforward and efficient construction of tricyclic lactam molecular architectures in which several carbon–carbon and carbon–nitrogen bonds are formed in a one-pot reaction from simple starting materials [166].


Scheme 56: Gold-catalyzed tandem reactions of alkynes.

The catalytic conversion of C(sp3)–Au bonds into C(sp3)–C(sp2) bonds is an ongoing challenge. In 2010, Zhang’s group reported the first example in an intermolecular oxidative cross-coupling manner [167]. In their pioneering work, carboamination, carboalkoxylation and carbolactonization of terminal alkenes 341 was achieved via oxidative gold catalysis and provided expedient access to various substituted N- or O-heterocycles (344351) (Scheme 57). Deuterium labeling experiments were carried out to unveil the reaction mechanism. The results established the anti nature of the alkene functionalization and the indispensable role of Au(I)/Au(III) catalysis. Toste’s group and Russell’s group subsequently reported the aminoarylation and oxyarylation of alkenes (352 and 355) following a similar protocol [168,169]. In the gold-catalyzed intramolecular aminoarylation of alkenes, ligand and halide effects played a dramatic role for the addition to alkenes. The experimental studies suggest that the C–C bond-forming reaction occurs through a bimolecular reductive elimination. Furthermore, a gold-catalyzed three-component coupling was also developed for the oxidative oxyarylation of alkenes 358 via a similar strategy [170].


Scheme 57: Aminoarylation and oxyarylation of alkenes.

From the discovery and development of metal–carbenoids in cycloadditions with alkenes, as well as the internal redox reactions on alkynes, a further extensive investigation was focused on the new redox/cycloaddition cascades on alkynes to obtain azacyclic compounds 363 [171]. The central cores of the products were constructed through a formal [2 + 2 + 1] cycloaddition that involved α-carbonyl–carbenoids, nitroso species and external alkenes (Scheme 58).


Scheme 58: Cycloaddition of 2-ethynylnitrobenzene with various alkenes.

A gold(I)-catalyzed cascade cyclization/oxidative cross-coupling process has been devised to prepare β-alkynyl-γ-butenolides 366 directly from allenoates 364 and various terminal alkynes [172]. The González group developed an intermolecular reaction of internal alkynes and imines, in which the propargyl tosylates 367 react with N-tosylaldimines 368 to afford cyclopent-2-enimines 369 [173]. The final product was achieved through a 1,2-migration of the tosylate followed by the interaction with the imine and a Nazarov-like cyclization. Barluenga et al. reported a gold-catalyzed cascade reaction involving an unusual intramolecular redox process in which 5-heteroaryl-substituted ketone derivatives 372 were obtained from secondary 5-hexyn-1-ols 370 (Scheme 59) [174]. The first step is supposed to be an intramolecular addition of the hydroxy group to the internal carbon of the triple bond, which is similar to the mechanism mentioned above [161,163].


Scheme 59: Gold-catalyzed tandem reactions of allenoates and alkynes.

6 Gold-catalyzed asymmetric addition reactions

The chiral ligand used for the transition metal-catalyzed reactions are the main determinant of enantioselectivity. Although asymmetric catalysis using chiral organometal complexes and chiral organomolecules have shown many advantages and a range of catalytic asymmetric reactions have been well documented [175], gold-catalyzed asymmetric addition reactions do not feature often. More recently this situation has been changing with significant progress being made in this area. To date, a broad range of chiral catalysts have been developed. Despite the large amount of chiral ligands used, only a few provided good to high enantioselectivities. The best ee values have been obtained with thiourea-cinchonine [176], chiral carbene [177], BINAP [178-180], and BIPHEP [181-190] analogs.

Monge et al. reported a direct asymmetric one-pot synthesis of optically active 2,3-dihydropyrroles from propargyl malononitriles 375 and N-Boc-protected imines 374 (Scheme 60) [176]. In the alkyne hydroamination (which is based on a bifunctional organocatalytic Mannich-type reaction, subsequent gold-catalyzed alkyne hydroamination and isomerization) thiourea-based hydrogen bonding organocatalyst 373 and PPh3AuNTf2 proved to be compatible upon protonation with p-TsOH. Electron-poor aromatic imines can be employed to give the corresponding 2,3-dihydropyrroles 376 in good yields (74–80%) and enantioselectivities (68–72% ee). However, lower enantioselectivity may result from the more electron-rich substituent groups. For example, the heteroaromatic thiophene-based imine gave the desired products 379 in good yield (70%), albeit in moderate enantioselectivity (58% ee).


Scheme 60: Gold-catalyzed asymmetric synthesis of 2,3-dihydropyrroles.

In the study of enantioselective cyclization, for example, of 1,6-enynes 381 for the synthesis of cyclopentane derivatives 382, Matsumoto and co-workers found chiral carbene–AuCl catalyst precursor 380 gave moderate enantioselectivity of up to 59% (Scheme 61) [177].


Scheme 61: Chiral [NHC–Au(I)]-catalyzed cyclization of enyne.

In the last 3 years, enantioselective gold-catalyzed reactions with BINAP and BIPHEP analogs have been far more documented compared to other ligands. In 2009, Toste’s group reported the application of [(R)-xylyl-binap-(AuOPNB)2] 383 in gold-catalyzed hydroaminations and hydroalkoxylations of allenes with hydroxylamines and hydrazines, which gave ee values of up to 99% [178]. Whereas chiral biarylphosphinegold(I) complexes are suitable catalysts for the enantioselective addition of nitrogen nucleophiles to allenes, the addition of oxygen nucleophiles requires the use of chiral anions 384 (Scheme 62).


Scheme 62: Gold-catalyzed hydroaminations and hydroalkoxylations.

Gold(I)-catalyzed asymmetric cyclization of 1,3-dihydroxymethyl-2-alkynylbenzene chromium complexes 389 gave planar chiral isochromene–chromium complexes 390 with high enantioselectivity [179]. Enantioselectivities of the cyclized isochromene–chromium complexes are largely dependent on the combination of gold pre-catalysts and silver salts. The use of AgSbF6 resulted in excellent enantioselectivities, regardless of the nature of the gold pre-catalyst (Scheme 63).


Scheme 63: Gold(I)-catalyzed asymmetric hydroalkoxylation of 1,3-dihydroxymethyl-2-alkynylbenzene chromium complexes.

Julolidine derivatives 396 were obtained via a highly enantioselective three-component (393395) cascade reaction which involved an enantioselective [4 + 2] cycloaddition reaction catalyzed by a chiral phosphoric acid and a subsequent catalytic intramolecular hydroamination by a gold(I) complex (Scheme 64) [180]. Further studies revealed that the Brønsted acid is both a chiral catalyst for the asymmetric cycloaddition and assists to facilitate the gold complex catalyzed hydroamination.


Scheme 64: Gold-catalyzed synthesis of julolidine derivatives.

Muratore et al. have reported an interesting example of C–N bond formation for the construction of chiral nitrogen-containing fused heterocycles 400 [191]. In this case, different alkynoic acids 397 were treated with Ph3PAuCl/AgOTf and tryptamines 398 in the presence of (R)-3,3'-bis(triphenylsilyl)BPA 399. The multi-catalyst cascade products were isolated in good yields and with high ee values (Scheme 65).


Scheme 65: Gold-catalyzed the synthesis of chiral fused heterocycles.

BIPHEP is the most extensively used chiral atropisomeric biaryl diphosphine ligand in the gold catalytic enantioselective addition. Although the gold catalysis has been well developed, the use of non-activated olefinic C–C double bonds is still largely unexplored due to the intrinsic inertness of C=C (with respect to allenes and alkynes) in taking part in nucleophilic addition reactions assisted by π-electrophilic activation [183]. The first example of a direct catalytic enantioselective Friedel–Crafts allylic alkylation reaction with alcohols was reported by Bandini’s group [182]. In terms of stereo-induction, 3,5-(t-Bu)2-4-MeO-MeOBIPHEP 401 (Scheme 66) gave the best results. Their method exploits the unprecedented capability of chiral gold(I) catalysts to activate selectively prochiral π-activated alcohols 402 toward aromatic functionalization in a highly enantioselective manner. On the basis of the above results, the same group extended the substrate scope of the 3,5-(t-Bu)2-4-MeO-MeOBIPHEP–Au-catalyzed Friedel–Crafts-type alkylation to indolyl alcohols 404 bearing an unsaturated side chain at the C2 position of the indole [183]. 1,6-Enyne derivatives and their analogs are the most frequently used substrates for gold-catalyzed cycloisomerization. Chao et al. discovered that the combination of atropisomeric electron-rich and hindered chiral ligand 3,5-(t-Bu)2-4-MeO-MeOBIPHEP 401 with Au(I) and silver salts promoted the enantioselective hydroarylation/cyclization reaction of 1,6-enynes 406 under mild conditions [181]. Treatment of enynes with catalytic amount of 3,5-(t-Bu)2-4-MeO-MeOBIPHEP(AuCl)2 and AgOTf in Et2O at room temperature for 15–20 hours led to the desired arylated products with ee values up to 98%. A similar strategy was also applied by the same group in the asymmetric Au(I)-catalyzed synthesis of bicyclo[4.1.0]heptene derivatives 410 via a cycloisomerization process of 1,6-enynes 409 [184].


Scheme 66: Gold-catalyzed asymmetric reactions with 3,5-(t-Bu)2-4-MeO-MeOBIPHEP.

Employing the atropisomeric electron-rich ligand 3,5-xylyl-MeOBIPHEP 411 (Scheme 67), Sanz’s group has developed an asymmetric gold-catalyzed cycloisomerization or alkoxycyclization of o-alkynylstyrenes 412 to prepare enantiomerically enriched functionalized 1H-indene derivatives 413 (including 414417) with high ee values (up to 92%) [190].


Scheme 67: Gold-catalyzed cyclization of o-(alkynyl) styrenes.

Due to the strength of sp3 C–H bonds and because it can be difficult for the metal to reach sterically hindered C–H bonds, direct functionalization of sp3 C–H bonds remained a challenge for a long time. Recently, however, Zhang’s group have presented the first example of an enantioselective redox-neutral domino reaction catalyzed by gold(I) that results in the direct functionalization of unreactive sp3 C–H bonds. Furan-fused azepine derivatives 419 (including 420422) have been obtained from enyne 418 with high enantioselectivities (Scheme 68) [185].


Scheme 68: Asymmetric gold(I)-catalyzed redox-neutral domino reactions of enynes.

Toste’s group developed the first example of a highly enantioselective polyene (423, 425, 427, 429) cyclization reaction in which transition metal-promoted alkyne activation serves as the cyclization initiating event [186]. The reactions of the enyne with the monocationic gold(I) complexes and AgSbF6 were carried out in the presence of sterically encumbered phosphines. The use of 3,5-(t-Bu)2-4-MeO-MeOBIPHEP 401 resulted in the formation of fused bicyclic compounds (424, 426, 428, 430) with good ee values (Scheme 69).


Scheme 69: Gold(I)-catalyzed enantioselective polyene cyclization reaction.

The 3,5-(t-Bu)2-4-MeO-MeOBIPHEP–Au complex was also employed in the carboalkoxylation reaction of propargyl esters 431 to afford benzopyrans 432 containing quaternary stereocenters with excellent enantioselectivity (Scheme 70) [187]. Kleinbeck and Toste developed a gold(I)-catalyzed enantioselective ring expansion of allenylcyclopropanols 436 with the chiral ligand 3,5-xylyl-MeOBIPHEP 411 to obtain cyclobutanones 437 (including 438441) (Scheme 71) [188]. Notably, the amount of catalyst could be reduced without significant loss of enantioselectivity or yield.


Scheme 70: Gold(I)-catalyzed enantioselective synthesis of benzopyrans.


Scheme 71: Gold(I)-catalyzed enantioselective ring expansion of allenylcyclopropanols.


In this account, we have presented a summary of the recent gold catalysis which involves the addition of X–H (X = O, N, C) bonds to C–C multiple bonds, tandem reactions, and asymmetric additions. The variety of reactions reflects that gold catalysis has become a very innovative synthetic tool in modern organic chemistry. What is particularly worth mentioning is that the design or choice of chiral ligands together with gold catalysts is the key to attaining high asymmetric induction. Up to now, only a small proportion of the chiral ligands have been successfully introduced to gold-catalyzed reactions. Consequently, the development of new and efficient chiral ligands or chiral gold complexes is still a major challenge for the future.


We gratefully acknowledge financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants 21021063, 20872153 and 81025017).


  1. Hashmi, A. S. K.; Bührle, M. Aldrichimica Acta 2010, 43, 27–33.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  2. Shapiro, N. D.; Toste, F. D. Synlett 2010, 675–691. doi:10.1055/s-0029-1219369
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  3. Patil, N. T.; Yamamoto, Y. ARKIVOC 2007, (v), 6–19.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  4. Hashmi, A. S. K. Pure Appl. Chem. 2010, 82, 657–668. doi:10.1351/Pac-Con-09-10-17
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  5. Bandini, M. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 1358–1367. doi:10.1039/C0cs00041h
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  6. Arcadi, A. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 3266–3325. doi:10.1021/Cr068435d
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  7. Shen, H. C. Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 3885–3903. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2008.01.081
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  8. Shen, H. C. Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 7847–7870. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2008.05.082
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  9. Fürstner, A.; Davies, P. W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 3410–3449. doi:10.1002/anie.200604335
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  10. Hashmi, A. S. K.; Hutchings, G. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 7896–7936. doi:10.1002/anie.200602454
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  11. Muzart, J. Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 5815–5849. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2008.04.018
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  12. Jiménez-Núñez, E.; Echavarren, A. M. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 3326–3350. doi:10.1021/Cr0684319
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  13. Hashmi, A. S. K. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 3180–3211. doi:10.1021/Cr000436x
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  14. Li, Z.; Brouwer, C.; He, C. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 3239–3265. doi:10.1021/Cr068434l
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  15. Skouta, R.; Li, C.-J. Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 4917–4938. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2008.03.083
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  16. Jiménez-Núñez, E.; Echavarren, A. M. Chem. Commun. 2007, 333–346. doi:10.1039/B612008c
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  17. Corma, A.; Leyva-Pérez, A.; Sabater, M. J. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 1657–1712. doi:10.1021/cr100414u
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  18. Eom, D.; Kang, D.; Lee, P. H. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 7447–7450. doi:10.1021/Jo101474s
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  19. Balamurugan, R.; Koppolu, S. R. Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 8139–8142. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2009.07.087
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  20. Du, X. W.; Song, F. J.; Lu, Y. H.; Chen, H. Y.; Liu, Y. H. Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 1839–1845. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2008.11.109
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  21. Kim, S.; Kang, D.; Shin, S.; Lee, P. H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010, 51, 1899–1901. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2010.02.026
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  22. Aponick, A.; Li, C.-Y.; Malinge, J.; Marques, E. F. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 4624–4627. doi:10.1021/Ol901901m
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  23. Aponick, A.; Biannic, B. Synthesis 2008, 3356–3359. doi:10.1055/s-0028-1083160
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  24. Bandini, M.; Monari, M.; Romaniello, A.; Tragni, M. Chem.–Eur. J. 2010, 16, 14272–14277. doi:10.1002/chem.201002606
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  25. Aksin, Ö.; Krause, N. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2008, 350, 1106–1112. doi:10.1002/adsc.200800050
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  26. Rüttinger, R.; Leutzow, J.; Wilsdorf, M.; Wilckens, K.; Czekelius, C. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 224–227. doi:10.1021/Ol102628x
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  27. Wilckens, K.; Uhlemann, M.; Czekelius, C. Chem.–Eur. J. 2009, 15, 13323–13326. doi:10.1002/chem.200901702
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  28. Liu, L.-P.; Hammond, G. B. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 5090–5092. doi:10.1021/Ol902215n
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  29. Aponick, A.; Li, C.-Y.; Palmes, J. A. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 121–124. doi:10.1021/Ol802491m
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  30. Zhang, Y.; Xue, J. J.; Xin, Z. J.; Xie, Z. X.; Li, Y. Synlett 2008, 940–944. doi:10.1055/s-2008-1042910
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  31. Bauer, J. T.; Hadfield, M. S.; Lee, A.-L. Chem. Commun. 2008, 6405–6407. doi:10.1039/B815891f
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  32. Hadfield, M. S.; Bauer, J. T.; Glen, P. E.; Lee, A. L. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2010, 8, 4090–4095. doi:10.1039/C0ob00085j
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  33. Corma, A.; Ruiz, V. R.; Leyva-Pérez, A.; Sabater, M. J. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2010, 352, 1701–1710. doi:10.1002/adsc.201000094
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  34. Schuler, M.; Silva, F.; Bobbio, C.; Tessier, A.; Gouverneur, V. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 7927–7930. doi:10.1002/anie.200802162
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  35. Hirai, T.; Hamasaki, A.; Nakamura, A.; Tokunaga, M. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 5510–5513. doi:10.1021/Ol9023166
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  36. Cuenca, A. B.; Mancha, G.; Asensio, G.; Medio-Simon, M. Chem.–Eur. J. 2008, 14, 1518–1523. doi:10.1002/chem.200701134
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  37. Ye, L. W.; Cui, L.; Zhang, G. Z.; Zhang, L. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 3258–3259. doi:10.1021/Ja100041e
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  38. Cordonnier, M.-C.; Blanc, A.; Pale, P. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 1569–1572. doi:10.1021/Ol800219k
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  39. Li, Y.; Tang, P. P.; Chen, Y. X.; Yu, B. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 4323–4325. doi:10.1021/Jo8003875
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  40. Götze, S.; Fitzner, R.; Kunz, H. Synlett 2009, 3346–3348. doi:10.1055/s-0029-1218356
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  41. Sureshkumar, G.; Hotha, S. Chem. Commun. 2008, 4282–4284. doi:10.1039/B806707d
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  42. Li, Y.; Yang, X. Y.; Liu, Y. P.; Zhu, C. S.; Yang, Y.; Yu, B. Chem.–Eur. J. 2010, 16, 1871–1882. doi:10.1002/chem.200902548
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  43. Thadke, S. A.; Hotha, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010, 51, 5912–5914. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2010.09.004
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  44. Belting, V.; Krause, N. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2009, 7, 1221–1225. doi:10.1039/B819704k
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  45. Belot, S.; Vogt, K. A.; Besnard, C.; Krause, N.; Alexakis, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 8923–8926. doi:10.1002/anie.200903905
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  46. Liu, L. P.; Hammond, G. B. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 4640–4643. doi:10.1021/ol101985d
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  47. Kotera, A.; Uenishi, J.; Uemura, M. J. Organomet. Chem. 2010, 695, 2180–2190. doi:10.1016/j.jorganchem.2010.06.005
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  48. Seraya, E.; Slack, E.; Ariafard, A.; Yates, B. F.; Hyland, C. J. T. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 4768–4771. doi:10.1021/Ol101862u
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  49. Wang, Y. H.; Zhu, L. L.; Zhang, Y. X.; Chen, Z. L. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 577–579. doi:10.1039/B913348h
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  50. Liu, L.-P.; Xu, B.; Mashuta, M. S.; Hammond, G. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 17642–17643. doi:10.1021/Ja806685j
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  51. Shi, Y. L.; Roth, K. E.; Ramgren, S. D.; Blum, S. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 18022–18023. doi:10.1021/Ja9068497
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  52. Pennell, M. N.; Unthank, M. G.; Turner, P.; Sheppard, T. D. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 76, 1479–1482. doi:10.1021/jo102263t
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  53. Buzas, A. K.; Istrate, F. M.; Gagosz, F. Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 1889–1901. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2008.11.108
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  54. Ye, L.; He, W.; Zhang, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 8550–8551. doi:10.1021/ja1033952
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  55. Widenhoefer, R. A.; Han, X. Q. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 4555–4563. doi:10.1002/ejoc.200600399
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  56. Sun, H.; Su, F.-Z.; Ni, J.; Cao, Y.; He, H.-Y.; Fan, K. N. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 4390–4393. doi:10.1002/anie.200900802
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  57. He, L.; Lou, X. B.; Ni, J.; Liu, Y. M.; Cao, Y.; He, H. Y.; Fan, K. N. Chem.–Eur. J. 2010, 16, 13965–13969. doi:10.1002/chem.201001848
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  58. Zeng, X. M.; Soleilhavoup, M.; Bertrand, G. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 3166–3169. doi:10.1021/Ol901418c
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  59. Hill, A. W.; Elsegood, M. R. J.; Kimber, M. C. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 5406–5409. doi:10.1021/Jo101035n
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  60. Hesp, K. D.; Stradiotto, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 18026–18029. doi:10.1021/Ja109192w
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  61. Mukherjee, P.; Widenhoefer, R. A. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 1334–1337. doi:10.1021/ol103175w
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  62. Nakamura, I.; Okamoto, M.; Terada, M. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 2453–2455. doi:10.1021/Ol100581m
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  63. Benedetti, E.; Lemière, G.; Chapellet, L.-L.; Penoni, A.; Palmisano, G.; Malacria, M.; Goddard, J.-P.; Fensterbank, L. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 4396–4399. doi:10.1021/Ol101889h
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  64. Ye, D. J.; Wang, J. F.; Zhang, X.; Zhou, Y.; Ding, X.; Feng, E. G.; Sun, H. F.; Liu, G. N.; Jiang, H. L.; Liu, H. Green Chem. 2009, 11, 1201–1208. doi:10.1039/B904044g
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  65. Li, H.; Widenhoefer, R. A. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 2671–2674. doi:10.1021/Ol900730w
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  66. Iglesias, A.; Muñiz, K. Chem.–Eur. J. 2009, 15, 10563–10569. doi:10.1002/chem.200901199
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  67. Mukherjee, P.; Widenhoefer, R. A. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 1184–1187. doi:10.1021/Ol902923e
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  68. Nakamura, I.; Yamagishi, U.; Song, D.; Konta, S.; Yamamoto, Y. Chem.–Asian J. 2008, 3, 285–295. doi:10.1002/asia.200700278
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  69. Surmont, R.; Verniest, G.; De Kimpe, N. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 2920–2923. doi:10.1021/Ol900953n
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  70. Gouault, N.; Le Roch, M.; Cornée, C.; David, M.; Uriac, P. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 5614–5617. doi:10.1021/Jo900693a
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  71. Huang, J. F.; Huang, X.; Liu, B. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2010, 8, 2697–2699. doi:10.1039/C003734f
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  72. Bates, R. W.; Dewey, M. R. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 3706–3708. doi:10.1021/Ol901094h
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  73. Ye, S. Y.; Yu, Z.-X. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 804–807. doi:10.1021/Ol9028786
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  74. Shu, X.-Z.; Liu, X.-Y.; Xiao, H.-Q.; Ji, K.-G.; Guo, L.-N.; Liang, Y.-M. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2008, 350, 243–248. doi:10.1002/adsc.200700452
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  75. Saito, A.; Konishi, T.; Hanzawa, Y. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 372–374. doi:10.1021/Ol902716n
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  76. Shapiro, N. D.; Shi, Y.; Toste, F. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 11654–11655. doi:10.1021/Ja903863b
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  77. Chen, D.-D.; Hou, X.-L.; Dai, L.-X. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 6944–6946. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2009.05.091
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  78. Davies, P. W.; Martin, N. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 2293–2296. doi:10.1021/Ol900609f
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  79. Davies, P. W.; Martin, N. J. Organomet. Chem. 2011, 696, 159–164. doi:10.1016/j.jorganchem.2010.08.040
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  80. Du, X. W.; Xie, X.; Liu, Y. H. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 510–513. doi:10.1021/Jo902357x
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  81. Kothandaraman, P.; Foo, S. J.; Chan, P. W. H. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 5947–5952. doi:10.1021/Jo900917q
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  82. Zhang, L.; Ye, D. J.; Zhou, Y.; Liu, G. N.; Feng, E. G.; Jiang, H. L.; Liu, H. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 3671–3677. doi:10.1021/Jo100378u
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  83. Ye, D.; Zhang, X.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, D.; Zhang, L.; Wang, H.; Jiang, H.; Liu, H. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2009, 351, 2770–2778. doi:10.1002/adsc.200900505
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  84. Ibrahim, N.; Hashmi, A. S. K.; Rominger, F. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2011, 353, 461–468. doi:10.1002/adsc.201000779
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  85. Huo, Z. B.; Yamamoto, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 3651–3653. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2009.03.129
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  86. Zhang, G. Z.; Peng, Y.; Cui, L.; Zhang, L. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 3112–3115. doi:10.1002/anie.200900585
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  87. Kimber, M. C. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 1128–1131. doi:10.1021/Ol1001494
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  88. Li, P. H.; Wang, L.; Wang, M.; You, F. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 5946–5951. doi:10.1002/ejoc.200800765
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  89. Xie, C. S.; Zhang, Y. H.; Yang, Y. Z. Chem. Commun. 2008, 4810–4812. doi:10.1039/B806821f
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  90. Tarselli, M. A.; Liu, A.; Gagne, M. R. Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 1785–1789. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2008.10.110
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  91. Brand, J. P.; Charpentier, J.; Waser, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 9346–9349. doi:10.1002/anie.200905419
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  92. Kar, A.; Mangu, N.; Kaiser, H. M.; Beller, M.; Tse, M. K. Chem. Commun. 2008, 386–388. doi:10.1039/B714928j
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  93. Barluenga, J.; Tudela, E.; Vicente, R.; Ballesteros, A.; Tomás, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 2107–2110. doi:10.1002/anie.201007795
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  94. Li, C. K.; Zeng, Y.; Zhang, H.; Feng, J. J.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, J. B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 6413–6417. doi:10.1002/anie.201002673
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  95. Li, C.-W.; Pati, K.; Lin, G.-Y.; Abu Sohel, S. M.; Hung, H.-H.; Liu, R.-S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 9891–9894. doi:10.1002/anie.201004647
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  96. Zou, Y.; Garayalde, D.; Wang, Q. R.; Nevado, C.; Goeke, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 10110–10113. doi:10.1002/anie.200804202
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  97. Horino, Y.; Yamamoto, T.; Ueda, K.; Kuroda, S.; Toste, F. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 2809–2811. doi:10.1021/Ja808780r
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  98. Patil, N. T.; Yamamoto, Y. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 3395–3442. doi:10.1021/Cr050041j
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  99. Chaudhuri, R.; Liao, H.-Y.; Liu, R.-S. Chem.–Eur. J. 2009, 15, 8895–8901. doi:10.1002/chem.200900580
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  100. Benitez, D.; Tkatchouk, E.; Gonzalez, A. Z.; Goddard, W. A., III; Toste, F. D. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 4798–4801. doi:10.1021/Ol9018002
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  101. Mauleón, P.; Zeldin, R. M.; González, A. Z.; Toste, F. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 6348–6349. doi:10.1021/Ja901649s
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  102. Alonso, I.; Trillo, B.; López, F.; Montserrat, S.; Ujaque, G.; Castedo, L.; Lledós, A.; Mascareñas, J. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 13020–13030. doi:10.1021/Ja905415r
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  103. Cui, L.; Peng, Y.; Zhang, L. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 8394–8395. doi:10.1021/Ja903531g
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  104. Teng, T.-M.; Liu, R.-S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 9298–9300. doi:10.1021/Ja1043837
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  105. Kusama, H.; Karibe, Y.; Onizawa, Y.; Iwasawa, N. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 4269–4272. doi:10.1002/anie.201001061
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  106. Gao, H. Y.; Wu, X. X.; Zhang, J. L. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 8764–8766. doi:10.1039/C0cc02778b
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  107. Hsu, Y.-C.; Datta, S.; Ting, C.-M.; Liu, R.-S. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 521–524. doi:10.1021/Ol7030334
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  108. Shapiro, N. D.; Toste, F. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 9244–9245. doi:10.1021/Ja803890t
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  109. Gung, B. W.; Craft, D. T.; Bailey, L. N.; Kirschbaum, K. Chem.–Eur. J. 2010, 16, 639–644. doi:10.1002/chem.200902185
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  110. Leseurre, L.; Chao, C.-M.; Seki, T.; Genin, E.; Toullec, P. Y.; Genêt, J.-P.; Michelet, V. Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 1911–1918. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2008.11.105
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  111. Lee, J. C. H.; Hall, D. G. Tetrahedron Lett. 2011, 52, 321–324. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2010.11.051
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  112. Li, G. J.; Liu, Y. H. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 2903–2909. doi:10.1021/Jo100137j
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  113. Chen, Z. L.; Zhang, Y.-X.; Wang, Y.-H.; Zhu, L.-L.; Liu, H.; Li, X.-X.; Guo, L. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 3468–3471. doi:10.1021/Ol1012923
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  114. Toullec, P. Y.; Blarre, T.; Michelet, V. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 2888–2891. doi:10.1021/Ol900864n
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  115. Escribano-Cuesta, A.; López-Carrillo, V.; Janssen, D.; Echavarren, A. M. Chem.–Eur. J. 2009, 15, 5646–5650. doi:10.1002/chem.200900668
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  116. Echavarren, A. M.; Jiménez-Núñez, E. Top. Catal. 2010, 53, 924–930. doi:10.1007/s11244-010-9524-6
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  117. Sperger, C.; Fiksdahl, A. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 2449–2452. doi:10.1021/Ol900681b
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  118. Sperger, C. A.; Fiksdahl, A. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 4542–4553. doi:10.1021/Jo100712d
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  119. Meng, J.; Zhao, Y.-L.; Ren, C.-Q.; Li, Y.; Li, Z.; Liu, Q. Chem.–Eur. J. 2009, 15, 1830–1834. doi:10.1002/chem.200802304
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  120. Sperger, C.; Strand, L. H. S.; Fiksdahl, A. Tetrahedron 2010, 66, 7749–7754. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2010.07.071
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  121. Cheong, P. H.-Y.; Morganelli, P.; Luzung, M. R.; Houk, K. N.; Toste, F. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 4517–4526. doi:10.1021/Ja711058f
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  122. Imase, H.; Noguchi, K.; Hirano, M.; Tanaka, K. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 3563–3566. doi:10.1021/Ol801466f
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  123. Lee, Y. T.; Kang, Y. K.; Chung, Y. K. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 7922–7934. doi:10.1021/Jo901771p
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  124. Barabé, F.; Bétournay, G.; Bellavance, G.; Barriault, L. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 4236–4238. doi:10.1021/Ol901722q
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  125. Michon, C.; Liu, S. Y.; Hiragushi, S.; Uenishi, J.; Uemura, M. Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 11756–11762. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2008.09.086
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  126. Jiménez-Núñez, E.; Molawi, K.; Echavarren, A. M. Chem. Commun. 2009, 7327–7329. doi:10.1039/B920119j
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  127. Amijs, C. H. M.; López-Carrillo, V.; Raducan, M.; Pérez-Galán, P.; Ferrer, C.; Echavarren, A. M. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 7721–7730. doi:10.1021/Jo8014769
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  128. Schelwies, M.; Moser, R.; Dempwolff, A. L.; Rominger, F.; Helmchen, G. Chem.–Eur. J. 2009, 15, 10888–10900. doi:10.1002/chem.200901614
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  129. Porcel, S.; López-Carrillo, V.; García-Yebra, C.; Echavarren, A. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 1883–1886. doi:10.1002/anie.200704500
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  130. Zhu, L.-L.; Wang, Y.-H.; Zhang, Y.-X.; Li, X.-X.; Liu, H.; Chen, Z. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 76, 441–449. doi:10.1021/Jo1018014
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  131. Miege, F.; Meyer, C.; Cossy, J. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 4144–4147. doi:10.1021/Ol101741f
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  132. Sanz, R.; Miguel, D.; Rodríguez, F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 7354–7357. doi:10.1002/anie.200802660
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  133. Barluenga, J.; Piedrafita, M.; Ballesteros, A.; Suárez-Sobrino, A. L.; González, J. M. Chem.–Eur. J. 2010, 16, 11827–11831. doi:10.1002/chem.201001754
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  134. Ferrer, C.; Escribano-Cuesta, A.; Echavarren, A. M. Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 9015–9020. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2009.08.067
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  135. Gronnier, C.; Odabachian, Y.; Gagosz, F. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 218–220. doi:10.1039/C0cc00033g
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  136. Park, C.; Lee, P. H. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 3359–3362. doi:10.1021/Ol801196g
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  137. Balamurugan, R.; Gudla, V. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 3116–3119. doi:10.1021/Ol900863d
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  138. Tarselli, M. A.; Gagné, M. R. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 2439–2441. doi:10.1021/Jo7024948
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  139. Kong, W.; Fu, C.; Ma, S. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 6545–6555. doi:10.1002/ejoc.201001112
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  140. Jurberg, I. D.; Gagosz, F. J. Organomet. Chem. 2011, 696, 37–41. doi:10.1016/j.jorganchem.2010.06.017
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  141. Hashmi, A. S. K.; Rudolph, M.; Huck, J.; Frey, W.; Bats, J. W.; Hamzić, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 5848–5852. doi:10.1002/anie.200900887
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  142. Bhunia, S.; Liu, R.-S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 16488–16489. doi:10.1021/Ja807384a
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  143. Zhou, J. Chem.–Asian J. 2010, 5, 422–434. doi:10.1002/asia.200900458
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  144. Chen, Y.; Li, G.; Liu, Y. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2011, 353, 392–400. doi:10.1002/adsc.201000644
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  145. Chen, Y.; Lu, Y.; Li, G.; Liu, Y. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 3838–3841. doi:10.1021/Ol901408u
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  146. Lu, Y.; Du, X.; Jia, X.; Liu, Y. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2009, 351, 1517–1522. doi:10.1002/adsc.200900068
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  147. Zhang, Q.; Cheng, M.; Hu, X.; Li, B.-G.; Ji, J.-X. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 7256–7257. doi:10.1021/ja101804p
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  148. Barluenga, J.; Fernández-Rodríguez, M. A.; García-García, P.; Aguilar, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 2764–2765. doi:10.1021/ja7112917
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  149. Li, C.-J.; Trost, B. M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2008, 105, 13197–13202. doi:10.1073/pnas.0804348105
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  150. Hirano, K.; Inaba, Y.; Takahashi, N.; Shimano, M.; Oishi, S.; Fujii, N.; Ohno, H. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 76, 1212–1227. doi:10.1021/jo102507c
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  151. Dudnik, A. S.; Schwier, T.; Gevorgyan, V. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 1465–1468. doi:10.1021/ol800229h
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  152. Jin, T.; Yamamoto, Y. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 3137–3139. doi:10.1021/Ol801265s
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  153. Liu, Y.; Qian, J.; Lou, S.; Xu, Z. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 6300–6303. doi:10.1021/Jo101357d
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  154. Ueda, M.; Sato, A.; Ikeda, Y.; Miyoshi, T.; Naito, T.; Miyata, O. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 2594–2597. doi:10.1021/Ol100803e
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  155. Liu, L.; Zhang, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 6093–6096. doi:10.1002/anie.200901628
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  156. Hirano, K.; Inaba, Y.; Watanabe, T.; Oishi, S.; Fujii, N.; Ohno, H. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2010, 352, 368–372. doi:10.1002/adsc.200900880
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  157. Kothandaraman, P.; Rao, W.; Foo, S. J.; Chan, P. W. H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 4619–4623. doi:10.1002/anie.201000341
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  158. Hopkinson, M. N.; Tessier, A.; Salisbury, A.; Giuffredi, G. T.; Combettes, L. E.; Gee, A. D.; Gouverneur, V. Chem.–Eur. J. 2010, 16, 4739–4743. doi:10.1002/chem.201000322
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  159. García-García, P.; Fernández-Rodríguez, M. A.; Aguilar, E. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 5534–5537. doi:10.1002/anie.200901269
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  160. Liu, Y.; Xu, W.; Wang, X. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 1448–1451. doi:10.1021/Ol100153h
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  161. Zhou, Y.; Zhai, Y.; Ji, X.; Liu, G.; Feng, E.; Ye, D.; Zhao, L.; Jiang, H.; Liu, H. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2010, 352, 373–378. doi:10.1002/adsc.200900724
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  162. Feng, E.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, D.; Zhang, L.; Sun, H.; Jiang, H.; Liu, H. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 3274–3282. doi:10.1021/jo100228u
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  163. Zhou, Y.; Li, J.; Ji, X.; Zhou, W.; Zhang, X.; Qian, W.; Jiang, H.; Liu, H. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 76, 1239–1249. doi:10.1021/jo101727r
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  164. Zhou, Y.; Ji, X.; Liu, G.; Zhang, D.; Zhao, L.; Jiang, H.; Liu, H. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2010, 352, 1711–1717. doi:10.1002/adsc.201000199
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  165. Patil, N. T.; Mutyala, A. K.; Lakshmi, P. G. V. V.; Gajula, B.; Sridhar, B.; Pottireddygari, G. R.; Rao, T. P. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 5963–5975. doi:10.1021/jo1013228
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  166. Zhou, Y.; Feng, E.; Liu, G.; Ye, D.; Li, J.; Jiang, H.; Liu, H. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 7344–7348. doi:10.1021/Jo901418m
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  167. Zhang, G.; Cui, L.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 1474–1475. doi:10.1021/Ja909555d
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  168. Brenzovich, W. E.; Benitez, D.; Lackner, A. D.; Shunatona, H. P.; Tkatchouk, E.; Goddard, W. A., III; Toste, F. D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 5519–5522. doi:10.1002/anie.201002739
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  169. Ball, L. T.; Green, M.; Lloyd-Jones, G. C.; Russell, C. A. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 4724–4727. doi:10.1021/Ol1019162
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  170. Melhado, A. D.; Brenzovich, W. E.; Lackner, A. D., Jr.; Toste, F. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 8885–8887. doi:10.1021/Ja1034123
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  171. Jadhav, A. M.; Bhunia, S.; Liao, H.-Y.; Liu, R.-S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 1769–1771. doi:10.1021/ja110514s
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  172. Hopkinson, M. N.; Ross, J. E.; Giuffredi, G. T.; Gee, A. D.; Gouverneur, V. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 4904–4907. doi:10.1021/ol102061k
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  173. Suárez-Pantiga, S.; Rubio, E.; Alvarez-Rúa, C.; González, J. M. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 13–16. doi:10.1021/ol8025523
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  174. Barluenga, J.; Fernández, A.; Rodríguez, F.; Fañanás, F. J. Chem.–Eur. J. 2009, 15, 8121–8123. doi:10.1002/chem.200901557
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  175. Ding, C.-H.; Hou, X.-L. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 1914–1937. doi:10.1021/cr100284m
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  176. Monge, D.; Jensen, K. L.; Franke, P. T.; Lykke, L.; Jørgensen, K. A. Chem.–Eur. J. 2010, 16, 9478–9484. doi:10.1002/chem.201001123
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  177. Matsumoto, Y.; Selim, K. B.; Nakanishi, H.; Yamada, K.; Yamamoto, Y.; Tomioka, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010, 51, 404–406. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2009.11.039
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  178. LaLonde, R. L.; Wang, Z. J.; Mba, M.; Lackner, A. D.; Toste, F. D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 598–601. doi:10.1002/anie.200905000
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  179. Murai, M.; Uenishi, J.; Uemura, M. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 4788–4791. doi:10.1021/Ol1019376
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  180. Wang, C.; Han, Z.-Y.; Luo, H.-W.; Gong, L.-Z. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 2266–2269. doi:10.1021/Ol1006086
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  181. Chao, C.-M.; Vitale, M. R.; Toullec, P. Y.; Genêt, J.-P.; Michelet, V. Chem.–Eur. J. 2009, 15, 1319–1323. doi:10.1002/chem.200802341
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  182. Bandini, M.; Eichholzer, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 9533–9537. doi:10.1002/anie.200904388
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  183. Bandini, M.; Gualandi, A.; Monari, M.; Romaniello, A.; Savoia, D.; Tragni, M. J. Organomet. Chem. 2011, 696, 338–347. doi:10.1016/j.jorganchem.2010.09.065
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  184. Chao, C. M.; Beltrami, D.; Toullec, P. Y.; Michelet, V. Chem. Commun. 2009, 6988–6990. doi:10.1039/B913554e
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  185. Zhou, G.; Liu, F.; Zhang, J. Chem.–Eur. J. 2011, 17, 3101–3104. doi:10.1002/chem.201100019
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  186. Sethofer, S. G.; Mayer, T.; Toste, F. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 8276–8277. doi:10.1021/Ja103544p
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  187. Uemura, M.; Watson, I. D. G.; Katsukawa, M.; Toste, F. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 3464–3465. doi:10.1021/Ja900155x
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  188. Kleinbeck, F.; Toste, F. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 9178–9179. doi:10.1021/Ja904055z
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  189. Liu, F.; Yu, Y.; Zhang, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 5505–5508. doi:10.1002/anie.200901299
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  190. Martínez, A.; García-García, P.; Fernández-Rodríguez, M. A.; Rodríguez, F.; Sanz, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 4633–4637. doi:10.1002/anie.201001089
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  191. Muratore, M. E.; Holloway, C. A.; Pilling, A. W.; Storer, R. I.; Trevitt, G.; Dixon, D. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 10796–10797. doi:10.1021/ja9024885
    Return to citation in text: [1]

Article is part of the thematic issue

Interesting articles

David Garayalde and Cristina Nevado

Soleiman E. Helaly, Wilawan Kuephadungphan, Patima Phainuphong, Mahmoud A. A. Ibrahim, Kanoksri Tasanathai, Suchada Mongkolsamrit, Janet Jennifer Luangsa-ard, Souwalak Phongpaichit, Vatcharin Rukachaisirikul and Marc Stadler

© 2011 Huang et al; licensee Beilstein-Institut.
This is an Open Access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The license is subject to the Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry terms and conditions: (

Back to Article List

Other Beilstein-Institut Open Science Activities

Keep Informed

RSS Feed

Subscribe to our Latest Articles RSS Feed.


Follow the Beilstein-Institut


Twitter: @BeilsteinInst