Bromination of hydrocarbons with CBr4, initiated by light-emitting diode irradiation

  1. Yuta Nishina1,
  2. Bunsho Ohtani2 and
  3. Kotaro Kikushima1

1Research Core for Interdisciplinary Science, Okayama University, Tsushimanaka, Kita-ku, Okayama 700-8530, Japan
2Catalysis Research Center, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 001-0021, Japan

  1. Corresponding author email

This article is part of the Thematic Series "Organic free radical chemistry".

Guest Editor: C. Stephenson
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2013, 9, 1663–1667. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjoc.9.190
Received 26 Apr 2013, Accepted 25 Jul 2013, Published 14 Aug 2013

Abstract

The bromination of hydrocarbons with CBr4 as a bromine source, induced by light-emitting diode (LED) irradiation, has been developed. Monobromides were synthesized with high efficiency without the need for any additives, catalysts, heating, or inert conditions. Action and absorption spectra suggest that CBr4 absorbs light to give active species for the bromination. The generation of CHBr3 was confirmed by NMR spectroscopy and GC–MS spectrometry analysis, indicating that the present bromination involves the homolytic cleavage of a C–Br bond in CBr4 followed by radical abstraction of a hydrogen atom from a hydrocarbon.

Keywords: bromination; free radical; hydrocarbon; light-emitting diode; photo irradiation

Introduction

Bromination reactions of organic compounds are fundamental reactions for providing a wide variety of organic precursors for industrial materials [1-8]. Generally, the bromination of saturated hydrocarbons proceeds through radical abstraction of hydrogen atoms and trapping with bromide, whereas the bromination reactions of aromatic and unsaturated hydrocarbons are induced by electrophilic addition of bromine and/or a cationic bromide. Combinations of N-bromosuccinimide (NBS) with azobisisobutyronitrile or benzoyl peroxide as radical initiators are typical conditions for Wohl–Ziegler bromination [9-12] and are widely used for the bromination of benzylic and allylic positions, despite the need for heating and the generation of equimolar amounts of waste. To avoid these drawbacks, several efforts have been focused on benzylic bromination using Br2 or bromide salts as highly efficient bromine sources [13-17]. However, the direct bromination of non-activated C–H bonds is still a challenging task. Although Br2 [13], CBr4 [18-20], R4NBr [21,22] and LiBr [23] have been reported to serve as bromine sources for the bromination of saturated hydrocarbons, these reactions exhibit low selectivity or reactivity. Efficient bromination using Br2 as a bromine source combined with a stoichiometric base [24], an excess of MnO2 [25], or a catalytic amount of Li2MnO3 [26] has been reported to give high reactivity and selectivity. The combination of CBr4 with a copper catalyst at high temperature also achieves effective bromination of hydrocarbons [27].

We have focused on CBr4, which is solid and easy to handle, as a bromine source. CBr4 has been used in organic synthesis to give useful bromide-containing precursors. For instance, alkyl alcohols can be converted to alkyl bromides in the presence of CBr4 and triphenylphosphine; this is known as the Appel reaction [28]. This combination can also be used to transform aldehydes into dibromoalkenes, which are useful precursors for the Corey–Fuchs reaction [29], to obtain terminal alkynes. Although CBr4 has been used for various bromination reactions including radical brominations, these reactions need further additives to proceed. Here, we disclose the efficient bromination of saturated hydrocarbons, using CBr4 as a bromine source without any additives, through radical reactions induced by irradiation with light from commonly used light-emitting diodes (LEDs) [30]. In this reaction, additives, catalysts, heating, and inert reaction conditions are all unnecessary.

Results and Discussion

First, the bromination of cyclohexane under LED irradiation was investigated using 1.0 mL of cyclohexane with 0.20 mmol CBr4 (Table 1). The desired monobrominated product was obtained in 77% yield, based on CBr4, after 2 h, and no dibromide was observed (Table 1, entry 1). It was found that the yield of cyclohexyl bromide exceeded 100% after 3 h (Table 1, entry 2). When the mixture was irradiated for 4 h, the product yield reached 148% and had almost peaked (Table 1, entry 3). Further improvements were not observed, even after 24 h (Table 1, entry 5). These results indicate that during the reaction one or more bromine atoms originated from one CBr4. It is considered that CHBr3 generated through radical abstraction of a hydrogen atom by a tribromomethyl radical served as a bromine source. To test this hypothesis the reaction was repeated with CHBr3 instead of CBr4 and the product was obtained in a low yield (Table 1, entry 6), whereas the reaction with CH2Br2 produced no bromination product at all under these conditions (Table 1, entry 7). Other bromination reagents such as NBS also gave the desired product in moderate yield (Table 1, entry 8). In the case of tetrabutylammonium bromide, no brominated product was obtained (Table 1, entry 9), showing that the present reaction was a radical reaction. Based on the assumption that the initial formation of bromine radicals would be important, addition of catalytic amounts of CBr4 along with various bromination sources was examined (Table 1, entries 10–12). The combination of catalytic CBr4 with CHBr3 or CH2Br2 resulted in slight improvements in the yields (Table 1, entries 10 and 11), showing these bromides also could serve as bromination sources in the presence of the radical species. The combination of CBr4 with NBS gave the desired product in a moderate yield (Table 1, entry 12). On the other hand, the reaction was inhibited by the addition of water (Table 1, entry 13) and performing the reaction under inert argon atmosphere led to a decreased yield of 87% (Table 1, entry 14).

Table 1: Bromination of cyclohexane using CBr4 under LED irradiation.a

[Graphic 1]
entry bromination source (mmol) time (h) yield (%)b
1 CBr4 (0.20) 2 77
2 CBr4 (0.20) 3 108
3 CBr4 (0.20) 4 148
4 CBr4 (0.20) 5 148
5 CBr4 (0.20) 24 150
6 CHBr3 (0.20) 24 27
7 CH2Br2 (0.20) 24 0
8 NBS (0.20) 24 31
9 Bu4NBr (0.20) 24 0
10 CBr4 (0.02)/CHBr3 (0.20) 24 39
11 CBr4 (0.02)/CH2Br2 (0.20) 24 16
12 CBr4 (0.02)/NBS (0.20) 24 79
13c CBr4 (0.20) 24 0
14d CBr4 (0.20) 24 87

aConditions: 1.0 mL of cyclohexane, bromination sources, under LED irradiation, rt. bYields were determined by GC analysis based on the mole of CBr4. cIn the presence of 0.10 mL water. dUnder Ar.

Based on the above experiments, the bromination of other substrates was examined with CBr4 under LED irradiation. Cyclooctane underwent bromination under the optimized conditions to furnish the monobromide in 178% yield, based on CBr4, without contamination by dibromide (Table 2, entry 1). The bromination of n-hexane produced three bromides: 1-bromohexane (14%), 2-bromohexane (84%), and 3-bromohexane (41%) (Table 2, entry 2). On the other hand, no bromination of toluene occurred under LED irradiation. In this case, light would be absorbed by the aromatic ring of toluene, suppressing the activation of CBr4. Using sunlight in place of LED light, however, resulted in the bromination of the benzylic position to give benzyl bromide in 140% yield (Table 2, entry 3).

Table 2: Bromination of other substrates using CBr4 under LED irradiation.a

[Graphic 2]
entry substrate product yield (%)
1 [Graphic 3] [Graphic 4] 178
2 [Graphic 5] [Graphic 6] 14
    [Graphic 7] 84
    [Graphic 8] 41
3 [Graphic 9] [Graphic 10] 140b

aConditions: 1.0 mL of substrate, 0.20 mmol of CBr4, under LED irradiation. Yields were determined by GC using dodecane as an internal standard. bUnder sunlight irradiation.

To investigate the wavelength dependency of the present reaction, the action spectrum of the bromination of cyclohexane in the presence of CBr4 was obtained by plotting the apparent quantum efficiency against wavelength (Figure 1, red line) [31]. It was found that the present reaction was promoted by irradiation with ultraviolet (UV) light and deactivated under visible-light (>475 nm) irradiation. CBr4 shows strong absorption in the UV region (Figure 1, blue line), and this overlaps with the above-mentioned action spectrum. The activation of CBr4 is therefore considered to be induced by photo-irradiation, initiating the reaction. Although other light sources could also activate CBr4, we adopted LED light due to safety, mildness, and availability. We have confirmed that fluorescent room light could also promote the reaction.

[1860-5397-9-190-1]

Figure 1: Action spectrum of bromination with CBr4, induced by LED irradiation (red line), and absorption spectrum of CBr4 (blue line).

A plausible mechanism for the present bromination is illustrated in Scheme 1. First, photo-irradiation generates a bromine radical and a CBr3 radical (Scheme 1, reaction 1), which abstracts a hydrogen atom from the substrate to form CHBr3 (Scheme 1, reaction 2). Finally, the radical species derived from the substrate reacts with the bromine radical or CBr4 to afford the brominated product (Scheme 1, reactions 3 and 4). Additionally, the in situ generated CHBr3 releases a bromine radical upon LED irradiation, thus serving as a bromine source (Scheme 1, reaction 5). Alternatively the radical species derived from the substrate abstracts a bromine atom from CHBr3 (Scheme 1, reaction 6).

[1860-5397-9-190-i1]

Scheme 1: Plausible mechanism for bromination of cyclohexane with CBr4 induced by LED irradiation.

To examine the above hypothesis, the bromination of cyclohexane was monitored using 13C NMR spectroscopy (Figure 2). CBr4 (0.50 mmol) dissolved in cyclohexane (0.10 mL) and CDCl3 (0.40 mL) was observed at −29.7 ppm (Figure 2a). After stirring a reaction mixture of CBr4 (0.50 mmol) and cyclohexane (0.10 mL) under LED irradiation for 24 h, peaks assigned to bromocyclohexane (53.4, 37.6, 25.9, and 25.1 ppm) and another strong peak at 9.6 ppm appeared (Figure 2c). The latter peak was found to be consistent with the peak of CHBr3 (0.50 mmol) dissolved in cyclohexane (0.10 mL) and CDCl3 (0.40 mL) (Figure 2b). Additionally, the generation of CHBr3 in the present bromination was confirmed by 1H NMR spectroscopy and GC–MS spectrometry. These results support the reaction pathway described above, although the chemical species after the second bromination was not assigned at this point.

[1860-5397-9-190-2]

Figure 2: 13C NMR monitoring of reaction mixtures: (a) 0.50 mmol of CBr4, 0.10 mL of cyclohexane, and 0.40 mL of CDCl3, (b) 0.5 mmol of CHBr3, 0.10 mL of cyclohexane, and 0.40 mL of CDCl3, (c) 0.50 mmol of CBr4 and 0.10 mL of cyclohexane, LED irradiation for 24 h, and then addition of 0.40 mL of CDCl3.

Conclusion

In conclusion, we have developed a method for the hydrocarbon bromination induced by LED irradiation using CBr4 as a bromine source. The present reaction system did not require any additives, catalysts, heating, or inert conditions, and is therefore an extremely simple procedure. An action spectrum and NMR measurements showed that the LED irradiation activates CBr4 to generate bromine radicals, which initiate the bromination reaction. Further elucidation of the detailed mechanism and the use of LED irradiation in other reaction systems are under investigation in our laboratory.

Experimental

General information

All commercially available compounds were purchased and used as received. Cyclohexane, cyclooctane, n-hexane, and toluene were purchased from Wako Pure Chemical Industries and used as received. 1H (400 MHz) and 13C (100 MHz) NMR spectra were recorded using a JEOL JNM-LA400 spectrometer. Proton chemical shifts are reported relative to residual solvent peak of CDCl3 at δ 7.26 ppm. Carbon chemical shifts are reported relative to CDCl3 at δ 77.00 ppm. Gas chromatographic analysis was conducted with Shimadzu GC-2014 equipped with FID detector. The chemical yields were determined using dodecane as an internal standard. The NMR data of all brominated products match those reported.

General procedure for the bromination induced by LED irradiation

A reaction tube was charged with CBr4 (66.33 mg, 0.20 mmol) and a hydrocarbon (1.0 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred under white LED (7 W) irradiation. To this was added dodecane (45.2 μL, 0.20 mmol) and the yield was determined by GC analysis with dodecane as an internal standard.

Acknowledgements

Financial support for this study was provided by the Development of Human Resources in Science and Technology, The Circle for the Promotion of Science and Engineering, and the Cooperative Research Program of Catalysis Research Center, Hokkaido University (Grant #11B2001). We also received generous support from Mr. Junya Miyata, Mr. Ryota Watanabe, and Dr. Tomoka Kawase on this research.

References

  1. Rosseels, G.; Houben, C.; Kerckx, P. Synthesis of a metabolite of fantofarone. In Advances in Organobromine Chemistry II; Desmurs, J. R.; Gérard, B.; Goldstein, M. J., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, New York, 1995; pp 152–159. doi:10.1016/S0926-9614(05)80016-4
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  2. Cristau, H. J.; Desmurs, J. R. Arylation of hard heteroatomic nucleophiles using bromoarenes substrates and Cu, Ni, Pd-catalysts. In Advances in Organobromine Chemistry II; Desmurs, J. R.; Gérard, B.; Goldstein, M. J., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, New York, 1995; pp 240–263. doi:10.1016/S0926-9614(05)80024-3
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  3. Rakita, P. E. In Handbook of Grignard Reagents; Silverman, G. S.; Rakita, P. E., Eds.; Marcel Dekker: New York, 1996; pp 1 ff.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  4. Echavarren, A. M.; Cárdenas, D. J. Mechanistic Aspects of Metal-Catalyzed C,C- and C,X-Bond-Forming Reactions. In Metal-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions, 2nd ed.; de Meijere, A.; Diederich, F., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2004; pp 1 ff. doi:10.1002/9783527619535.ch1
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  5. Knochel, P.; Dohle, W.; Gommermann, N.; Kneisel, F. F.; Kopp, F.; Korn, T.; Sapountzis, I.; Vu, V. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 4302–4320. doi:10.1002/anie.200300579
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  6. Parham, W. E.; Bradsher, C. K. Acc. Chem. Res. 1982, 15, 300–305. doi:10.1021/ar00082a001
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  7. Gribble, G. W. Acc. Chem. Res. 1998, 31, 141–152. doi:10.1021/ar9701777
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  8. Gribble, G. W. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1999, 28, 335–346. doi:10.1039/a900201d
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  9. Wohl, A. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1919, 52, 51–63. doi:10.1002/cber.19190520109
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  10. Ziegler, K.; Schenck, G.; Krockow, E. W.; Siebert, A.; Wenz, A.; Weber, H. Justus Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1942, 551, 1–79. doi:10.1002/jlac.19425510102
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  11. Djerassi, C. Chem. Rev. 1948, 43, 271–317. doi:10.1021/cr60135a004
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  12. Horner, L.; Winkelman, E. M. Angew. Chem. 1959, 71, 349–365. doi:10.1002/ange.19590711102
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  13. Shaw, H.; Perlmutter, H. D.; Gu, C.; Arco, S. D.; Quibuyen, T. O. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 236–237. doi:10.1021/jo950371b
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  14. Kikuchi, D.; Sakaguchi, S.; Ishii, Y. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 6023–6026. doi:10.1021/jo972263q
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  15. Mestres, R.; Palenzuela, J. Green Chem. 2002, 4, 314–316. doi:10.1039/b203055a
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  16. Podgoršek, A.; Stavber, S.; Zupana, M.; Iskra, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 7245–7247. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2006.07.109
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  17. Adimurthy, S.; Ghosh, S.; Patoliya, P. U.; Ramachandraiah, G.; Agrawal, M.; Gandhi, M. R.; Upadhyay, S. C.; Ghosh, P. K.; Ranu, B. C. Green Chem. 2008, 10, 232–237. doi:10.1039/b713829f
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  18. Schreiner, P. R.; Lauenstein, O.; Kolomitsyn, I. V.; Nadi, S.; Fokin, A. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 1895–1897. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1521-3773(19980803)37:13/14<1895::AID-ANIE1895>3.0.CO;2-A
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  19. Barton, D. H. R.; Csuhai, E.; Doller, D. Tetrahedron 1992, 48, 9195–9206. doi:10.1016/S0040-4020(01)85610-6
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  20. Wiedenfeld, D. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1997, 339–348. doi:10.1039/A600172F
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  21. Kojima, T.; Matsuo, H.; Matsuda, Y. Chem. Lett. 1998, 27, 1085–1086. doi:10.1246/cl.1998.1085
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  22. He, Y.; Goldsmith, C. R. Synlett 2010, 1377–1380. doi:10.1055/s-0029-1219832
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  23. Shaikh, T. M.; Sudalai, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 5589–5592. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2005.06.033
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  24. Montoro, R.; Wirth, T. Synthesis 2005, 1473–1478. doi:10.1055/s-2005-865322
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  25. Jiang, X.; Shen, M.; Tang, Y.; Li, C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 487–489. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2004.11.113
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  26. Nishina, Y.; Morita, J.; Ohtani, B. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 2158–2162. doi:10.1039/c2ra22197g
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  27. Smirnov, V. V.; Zelikman, V. M.; Beletskaya, I. P.; Golubeva, E. N.; Tsvetkov, D. S.; Levitskii, M. M.; Kazankova, M. A. Russ. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 38, 962–966. doi:10.1023/A:1020889209717
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  28. Appel, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1975, 14, 801–811. doi:10.1002/anie.197508011
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  29. Corey, E. J.; Fuchs, P. L. Tetrahedron Lett. 1972, 13, 3769–3772. doi:10.1016/S0040-4039(01)94157-7
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  30. Nobuta, T.; Fujiya, A.; Hirashima, S.; Tada, N.; Miura, T.; Itoh, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2012, 53, 5306–5308. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2012.07.091
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  31. Torimoto, T.; Nakamura, N.; Ikeda, S.; Ohtani, B. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2002, 4, 5910–5914. doi:10.1039/b207448f
    Return to citation in text: [1]

© 2013 Nishina et al; licensee Beilstein-Institut.
This is an Open Access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The license is subject to the Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry terms and conditions: (http://www.beilstein-journals.org/bjoc)

 
Back to Article List

Other Beilstein-Institut Open Science Activities

Keep Informed

RSS Feed

Subscribe to our Latest Articles RSS Feed.

Subscribe

Follow the Beilstein-Institut

LinkedIn

Twitter: @BeilsteinInst