Volume No. 12
2021
Pages 1 - 101
Table of Contents |
|
| 6 | Full Research Paper |
| 2 | Review |
- Review
- Published 04 Jan 2021
-
PDF -
Album-
![]()
Figure 1: Annual (bars) and accumulated (blue line) numbers of publications on bio-imaging using the helium-i...
-
![]()
Figure 2: When the ion beam of the HIM interacts with the sample, primary ions and secondary particles escape...
-
![]()
Figure 3: Charge compensation in the HIM using the flood gun. An uncoated maize root was imaged with differen...
-
![]()
Figure 4: HIM of two Pseudomonas putida biofilms grown on polyvinylchloride coverslips in parallel under exac...
-
![]()
Figure 5: Rabbit cartilage collagen imaged by HIM. High resolution and depth of field reveal nanoscopic netwo...
-
![]()
Figure 6: Helium-ion micrograph showing an immunogold-labelled (arrows) proximal tubule in a mouse kidney. Sc...
-
![]()
Figure 7: HIM image of a Papilio ulysses butterfly black ground scale. Scale bar is 400 nm. Adapted from [12]. Co...
-
![]()
Figure 8: Helium-ion micrographs of the T4 bacteriophage infecting Escherichia coli. (a) Three bacteria with ...
-
![]()
Figure 9: Helium-ion micrograph of the predatory bacterium Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus infecting Escherichia c...
-
![]()
Figure 10: HIM of Toxoplasma gongii inside a vacuole of an infected Rhesus monkey kidney epithelial cell. The ...
-
![]()
Figure 11: Microbial mat collected at the Himalayan hot springs at Manikaran imaged with the HIM. Unpublished ...
-
![]()
Figure 12: A biofilm of Chlorella microalgae imaged using HIM. Charge compensation allowed for imaging the bio...
-
![]()
Figure 13: Helium-ion micrograph of a twisted stalk produced by a microaerophilic Fe(II)-oxidizing bacterium (...
-
![]()
Figure 14: Helium-ion micrographs of the predatory nematode Pristionchus pacificus before (a) and after (b) th...
-
![]()
Figure 15: Helium-ion micrographs of sectioned microbiological samples. (a) He-ion-milled cross section of a E...
-
![]()
Figure 16: Helium-ion micrograph of a Ne-ion-milled section of a E. coli–nanopillared dragonfly wing interface...
-
- Full Research Paper
- Published 05 Jan 2021
-
PDF -
Album-
![]()
Figure 1: AFM topography image (10 µm × 10 µm) of an FTO substrate (left) and of an FTO substrate coated with...
-
![]()
Figure 2: CVs of 0.5 mM K3[Fe(CN)6] and 0.5 mM K4[Fe(CN)6] in 0.5 M KCl on FTO electrodes covered with Al2O3 ...
-
![]()
Figure 3: CVs of 0.5 mM K3[Fe(CN)6] and 0.5 mM K4[Fe(CN)6] in 0.5 M KCl demonstrating the blocking properties...
-
![]()
Figure 4: CVs of 0.5 mM K3[Fe(CN)6] and 0.5 mM K4[Fe(CN)6] in 0.5 M KCl demonstrating the blocking properties...
-
![]()
Figure 5: Si wafer coated with an Al2O3 film (17 nm) after exposure to 1 M NaOH for 1h. (a) Optical microscop...
-
![]()
Figure 6: CVs of 0.5 mM K3[Fe(CN)6] and 0.5 mM K4[Fe(CN)6] in 0.5 M KCl demonstrating blocking properties of ...
-
![]()
Figure 7: CVs in the presence of 0.5 mM K3[Fe(CN)6] and 0.5 mM K4[Fe(CN)6] in 0.5 M KCl. Blocking properties ...
-
![]()
Figure 8: Chronoamperometry in buffered solution (pH 7.2). Comparison of bare FTO (blue) and FTO covered with...
-
![]()
Figure 9: XRD patterns of samples polarized at −1.2 V vs Ag/AgCl in buffer (pH 7.2) for 5 h. Red trace: FTO, ...
-
-
Supp. Info
- Full Research Paper
- Published 08 Jan 2021
-
PDF -
Album-
![]()
Figure 1: STEM image of (A) oleate-coated UCNPs (NaYF4: 18% Yb, 2% Er). (diameter = 33 ± 2 nm), (B) UC@thin (...
-
![]()
Figure 2: MTT assay results of silica-coated UCNPs and SiO2 nanoparticles on RAW 264.7 cells.
-
![]()
Figure 3: (A) SSC histograms of RAW 264.7 cells after particle exposure for 24 h at 37 °C. UC@thin_NH2 is mar...
-
![]()
Figure 4: Effect of (A) UC@thin_NH2 (tSiO2 = 8 ± 2 nm) and (B) UC@thick_NH2 (tSiO2 = 21 ± 2 nm) on the cell c...
-
-
Supp. Info
- Full Research Paper
- Published 18 Jan 2021
-
PDF -
Album-
![]()
Figure 1: (a) Representation of tip–sample interactions. (b) Schematic drawing of a FDC. (c) FDCs (approach, ...
-
![]()
Figure 2: FDCs (averaged from at least 50 single curves) of bulk materials: boehmite (green), epoxy (brown), ...
-
![]()
Figure 3: The property domain of FDCs (average of ≈100 single curves) of bulk materials: PC (blue), epoxy (br...
-
![]()
Figure 4: (a) AFM tapping-mode topography. PC and epoxy phases can be distinguished by the height difference....
-
![]()
Figure 5: (a) AFM tapping-mode topography. Epoxy and boehmite phases can be distinguished by features that va...
-
![]()
Figure 6: AFM-IR measurements. (a) AFM height, (b) IR amplitude at 1512 cm−1, and (c) IR amplitude at 1070 cm...
-
![]()
Figure 7: ImAFM ADFS (a) height, (b) kr, and (c) Fattr map (128 × 128 points). (d) Property domain of the kr ...
-
![]()
Figure 8: (a) AFM tapping topography, the black line indicates the position of (b). (b) mPCA via ImAFM ADFS m...
-
-
Supp. Info
- Full Research Paper
- Published 19 Jan 2021
-
PDF -
Album-
![]()
Figure 1: Size distribution of binary nanoparticles with the target composition of Cu3Au at a temperature of T...
-
![]()
Figure 2: Size distribution of binary Cu–Au nanoparticles with different chemical compositions at T = 77 K.
-
![]()
Figure 3: The percentage of copper atoms in binary Cu–Au nanoparticles with different chemical compositions o...
-
![]()
Figure 4: Image of a Cu60Au40 nanoparticle obtained by MD modeling. Copper atoms are shown in green and gold ...
-
- Full Research Paper
- Published 21 Jan 2021
-
PDF -
Album-
![]()
Figure 1: Schematic diagram of a qPlus sensor with a long tilted tip.
-
![]()
Figure 2: (a) Schematic diagram of the simulation model including tuning fork, Torr seal epoxy glue, and tung...
-
![]()
Figure 3: (a) Two different eigenmodes in the simulation. In-phase mode: the tip and the tuning fork deflect ...
-
![]()
Figure 4: The relations between fq, ftf, and ftip for the qPlus sensor with a tip diameter of 0.025 mm in the...
-
![]()
Figure 5: Illustrations of Atfz (a–d) and output currents (e–h) as functions of the tip length for the four d...
-
![]()
Figure 6: (a–d) Atip and (e–h) Ax/Az as functions of the tip length depicted for the four different tip diame...
-
![]()
Figure 7: (a) SEM observation of a qPlus sensor with an attached tungsten tip with a length of about 0.942 mm...
-
![]()
Figure 8: Equivalent stiffness keq of the qPlus sensor as a function of the tip length depicted for the four ...
-
![]()
Figure 9: Q factor as a function of the tip length depicted for the four different tip diameters.
-
-
Supp. Info
- Full Research Paper
- Published 22 Jan 2021
-
PDF -
Album-
![]()
Figure 1: WT PM deposited on NBPT CNM using drop-casting and electrophoretic sedimentation: (a, b) initial dr...
-
![]()
Figure 2: (a) Illustration of a hybrid structure consisting of an NTA CNM and a c-His PM. The c-His PM consis...
-
![]()
Figure 3: (a–c) Large-area agglomerates of c-His PM forming an immobilized quasi-monolayer with only a few va...
-
-
Supp. Info
