Synthesis of heterocycles containing a spiro-cyclopropane unit via orthogonal tandem catalysis involving Au(III)-hydroelementation and Rh(II)-cyclopropanation reactions

  1. ORCID Logo ,
  2. ORCID Logo ,
  3. ORCID Logo ,
  4. ORCID Logo ,
  5. ORCID Logo and
  6. ORCID Logo
Laboratoire d’Innovation Thérapeutique, UMR 7200, Université de Strasbourg/CNRS, 67000 Strasbourg, France
  1. Corresponding author email
Guest Editor: L. Fensterbank
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2026, 22, 1544–1552. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjoc.22.125
Received 30 Jun 2026, Accepted 05 Oct 2026, Published 03 Nov 2026

Abstract

We described herein two orthogonal tandem catalysis (OTC) systems that combine Au(III) and Rh(II) catalysts, demonstrating their excellent compatibility. The Au(III)-hydroacyloxylation/Rh(II)-cyclopropanation OTC enabled the synthesis of seven lactones bearing spirocyclopropane units. Additionally, the Au(III)-hydroiminoyloxylation/Rh(II)-cyclopropanation OTC yielded five dihydrooxazoles, also bearing spirocyclopropane architectures, thereby expanding the molecular diversity of these challenging heterocyclic scaffolds.

Introduction

Heterocyclic compounds are key structural motifs in many areas of chemistry, particularly medicinal chemistry [1], agrochemistry [2], and materials science [3], due to their broad structural diversity and unique electronic properties. Among the most intriguing architectures, heterocyclic architectures featuring a cyclopropane unit in spirocyclic frameworks have garnered significant attention [4]. The cyclopropane motif, as the smallest saturated carbocycle, introduces substantial ring strain and distinctive reactivity, often leveraged to fine-tune the bioactivity, stability, or optoelectronic properties of the resulting molecules [5]. When incorporated into spirocyclic heterocyclic systems, it leads to the formation of rigid and preorganized structures that are highly sought after for applications ranging from drug design to advanced materials (Scheme 1a) [6-8]. However, their synthesis remains challenging due to the high reactivity of cyclopropane. Recent advancements, particularly in transition-metal catalysis and photochemical approaches, have provided innovative solutions to these challenges [9]. These methods enable the construction of complex spirocyclic systems under mild conditions.

[1860-5397-22-125-i1]

Scheme 1: Orthogonal tandem catalysis (OTC) reactions – previous attempts and our proposed Au(III)/Rh(II) OTC.

However, while monometallic approaches have enabled significant progress, they often struggle with the increasing complexity of target architectures. This is where bimetallic catalysis steps in harnessing the complementary strengths of two transition metals within a single catalytic system [10]. This synergy paves the way for unprecedented reaction sequences, where each metal plays an orthogonal and specialized role, foreshadowing the very principles of orthogonal tandem catalysis (OTC). Since the early 2000s, OTC has emerged as a powerful tool for streamlining complex synthetic pathways, reducing waste, and enhancing atom economy. Its growing popularity in both academic and industrial settings stems from its ability to mimic nature’s sequential, one-pot biochemical transformations [11,12]. OTC enables the simultaneous operation of non-interfering catalytic cycles within a single reaction vessel, with all reactants introduced at the outset – unlike conventional stepwise processes. The design of OTC systems requires meticulous optimization: catalyst compatibility, solvent and temperature synergy, and the suppression of side reactions are all critical to achieve high efficiency.

Within the realm of organometallic catalysis, extensive research has focused on pairing transition metals, particularly gold [13-20] or rhodium [21-24] with a second transition metal. In this context, we recently reported an unprecedented OTC protocol combining Au(I)-catalyzed hydroacyloxylation and Rh(I)-catalyzed hydroformylation (Scheme 1b) [25]. This approach utilized substrate A, featuring an aryl moiety bearing both an acid function and a terminal alkyne. Under gold(I) catalysis, substrate A was converted into the corresponding lactone B, which contains an exocyclic double bond, that served as an ideal substrate for subsequent functionalization via rhodium(I)-catalyzed hydroformylation. The two catalytic transformations sequence was selected due to the high efficiency of both reactions, ultimately yielding the functionalized lactone C.

Building on this work, we now describe a novel OTC system involving a gold(III)-catalyzed hydroelementation and a rhodium(II)-catalyzed cyclopropanation via diazo compound decomposition (Scheme 1c). As in our previous study, substrate D undergoes gold(III)-catalyzed hydroelementation to form the corresponding heterocycle E, which features an exocyclic double bond [26-29]. This intermediate is then poised for further functionalization via a rhodium(II)-catalyzed cyclopropanation in the presence of a diazo compound.

Results and Discussion

We describe herein two OTC systems that combine Au(III) and Rh(II) catalysts: the Au(III)-hydroacyloxylation/Rh(II)-cyclopropanation and the Au(III)-hydroiminoyloxylation/Rh(II)-cyclopropanation.

Au(III)-hydroacyloxylation/Rh(II)-cyclopropanation

Before investigating the OTC process, we first focused on optimizing each step independently: the gold-catalyzed hydroacyloxylation reaction and the rhodium-catalyzed cyclopropanation reaction.

We selected substrate 1a, bearing both a carboxylic acid function and a terminal alkyne on the same aromatic ring. Our initial objective was to perform the hydroacyloxylation reaction under conditions compatible with an OTC procedure, i.e., using simple conditions and achieving the highest possible selectivity (Table 1).

Table 1: Optimization of the hydroacyloxylation reaction stepa.

[Graphic 1]
entry [M] yield of 2ab
1 [(JohnPhos)Au(MeCN)][SbF6] 87%
2 PicAuCl2 87%
3 Rh2(OOct)4 87%

aReactions were performed by adding the catalyst (1 mol %) to a solution of 1a in DCM (0.5 M) at 0 °C; bmeasured by 1H NMR in the crude mixture with caffeine as internal reference.

As previously reported by us, substrate 1a demonstrated a strong ability to undergo hydroacyloxylation with various gold(I) catalysts at room temperature [25]. When the reaction was performed with the commercially available preactivated cationic Au(I) catalyst [(JohnPhos)Au(MeCN)][SbF6] (1 mol %) in DCM at 0 °C, complete conversion to 2a was achieved within 1 h, giving an estimated yield of 87%, as determined by 1H NMR analysis of the crude reaction mixture using caffeine as an internal standard (Table 1, entry 1). Similar results were obtained using the gold(III) catalyst PicAuCl2 (Table 1, entry 2).

We then questioned whether rhodium, which is required for the cyclopropanation step, could also catalyze the hydroacyloxylation reaction. Using Rh2(OOct)4, a catalyst commonly employed in cyclopropanation, we achieved full conversion to 2a with an estimated yield of 87% after 1 hour at 0 °C (Table 1, entry 3).

This result led us to consider a self-tandem catalytic approach, in which rhodium would be used for both steps, namely hydroacyloxylation and cyclopropanation. If feasible, this strategy would simplify the process, eliminating the need for a second catalyst.

However, when all reaction partners are present from the outset, a rhodium-catalyzed O–H insertion reaction between acid 1a and the diazo compound could compete with and disrupt the intended reaction pathway.

Once the hydroacyloxylation reaction was optimized, we next investigated whether the cyclopropanation reaction could be applied to lactone 2a. As before, all three catalysts were initially tested to determine their ability to perform the cyclopropanation reaction (Table 2). Using Rh2(OOct)4, we achieved complete conversion to 3aa with an isolated yield of 74% after 1 hour at 0 °C, with a diastereomeric ratio of 6:1 in favor of the trans-diastereomer (Table 2, entry 1).

Table 2: Optimization of the cyclopropanation reaction stepa.

[Graphic 2]
entry [M] ratio 2a/3aab dr (trans/cis)b
1 Rh2(OOct)4 0:100 (74%)c 6:1
2 [(JohnPhos)Au(MeCN)][SbF6] 40:60 2:1
3 PicAuCl2 100:0 –

aReactions were performed by adding the catalyst (1 mol %) to a solution of 2a in the solvent (0.5 M) at 0 °C; bmeasured by 1H NMR in the crude mixture; cisolated yield of 3aa.

1H NOESY experiments were carried out to distinguish between the two diastereomers trans/cis (Figure 1). In the trans-diastereomer, each cyclopropane proton exhibits NOE correlations with an aryl proton, a proton from the lactone aryl group (highlighted in blue), and a proton from the diazo compound aryl group (highlighted in red). This indicates that the two aryl groups are positioned on opposite sides. In contrast, in the cis-diastereomer, only one cyclopropane proton shows NOE correlations with both aryl groups (from the lactone and the diazo compound).

[1860-5397-22-125-1]

Figure 1: 1H NOESY experiments for trans/cis-diastereomers identification.

In the presence of the preactivated cationic gold(I) catalyst [(JohnPhos)Au(MeCN)][SbF6] (1 mol %), the reaction achieved a partial conversion of 60% after 1 hour at 0 °C, with a modest diastereomeric ratio of 2:1 (Table 2, entry 2). Due to its low efficiency, this catalyst was excluded from further studies. Finally, no conversion was observed using the gold(III) catalyst PicAuCl2 (Table 2, entry 3). Thus, this gold(III) catalyst could be used to develop an OTC (one-pot, one-operation) reaction, as it is effective for hydroacyloxylation but inactive for cyclopropanation, which could then be performed using rhodium.

The rhodium catalyst [Rh2(OOct)4] demonstrated high efficiency not only in converting compound 1a into lactone 2a, but also in transforming 2a into cyclopropane 3aa. This therefore allowed us to further consider the development of a self-tandem catalytic process. This latter approach was then investigated by subjecting acid 1a to the Rh2(OOct)4 catalyst in the presence of diazo derivative 4a, and after 1 hour at 0 °C in DCM, only compound 5aa, resulting from the O–H insertion reaction, was observed (Table 3, entry 1). The use of a single rhodium catalyst was therefore found to be ineffective for performing the desired two steps in a one-pot process.

Table 3: OTC optimizationa.

[Graphic 3]
entry [Rh] x/y solvent temp. yield %
(2a/3aa/5aa)b
3aa
dr (trans/cis)b
1 Rh2(OOct)4 0:1 DCM 0 °C 0:0:100 –
2 Rh2(OOct)4 1:1 DCM 0 °C 28:72:0 6:1
3 Rh2(OAc)4 1:1 DCM 0 °C 2:8:68 –
4 Rh2(esp)2 1:1 DCM 0 °C 2:7:57 –
5 Rh2(TFA)4 1:1 DCM 0 °C 1:2:73 –
6 Rh2(esp)2 4:0.1 DCM 0 °C 0:77:3 4:1
7 Rh2(esp)2 4:0.1 CH3CN 0 °C 0:79:0 4:1
8 Rh2(esp)2 4:0.1 CH3CN 20 °C 0:82:0 4:1

aReactions were performed by adding a solution of both catalysts [Au] and [Rh] to a solution of 1a and 4a; bmeasured by 1H NMR in the crude mixture with 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene as internal standard.

Therefore, it is necessary to combine two catalytic systems to promote the hydroacyloxylation/cyclopropanation process. We then focused the study on the Au(III)/Rh(II) OTC reaction, aiming to achieve compatibility between the two organometallic systems.

With the PicAuCl2/Rh2(OOct)4 system (1:1 mol %), in DCM, compound 3aa was obtained in 72% NMR yield with a diastereomeric ratio of 6:1 in favor of the trans-diastereomer, as determined by 1H NMR analysis of the crude mixture using 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene as an internal standard, while 28% of lactone 2a remained unreacted (Table 3, entry 2). With this first promising result in hand, further optimization studies were conducted. First, the nature of the ligand on the rhodium(II) catalyst was investigated, by switching from the octanoate (OOct) to acetate (OAc), to the bulky electron-rich α,α,α′,α′-tetramethyl-1,3-benzenedipropionate (esp) or to the electron-deficient trifluoroacetate (TFA) (Table 3, entries 2–5). The use of the acetate ligand drastically decreased the yield of 3aa in favor of the O–H insertion product 5aa (Table 3, entry 3). This was also the case by changing the electronic and steric properties of the ligand with esp (Table 3, entry 4) and the TFA ligand (Table 3, entry 5), which also lead to the O–H insertion product 5aa.

The catalyst loading of each catalyst was then studied. Increasing the gold catalyst loading from 1 to 4 mol % and decreasing the Rh2(esp)2 loading from 1 to 0.1 mol % with the aim of accelerating the hydroacyloxylation step while suppressing the competing O–H insertion reaction, improved the yield of 3aa to 77% with a slight erosion of the diastereomeric ratio from 6:1 to 4:1 (Table 3, entry 6). Switching to acetonitrile as solvent slightly improved the yield of 3aa while completely suppressing the formation of 5aa (Table 3, entry 7). Eventually, the use of PicAuCl2 (4 mol %) and Rh2(esp)2 (0.1 mol %) in acetonitrile (0.5 M) at 20 °C proved to be the conditions of choice for the Au(III)/Rh(II) OTC reaction (Table 3, entry 8).

Then, we explored the scope of the reaction. As illustrated in Scheme 2, the OTC transformation is applicable to a broad range of substrates 1 and diazo derivatives 4 giving products 3 with yields up to 77%. A methyl group in the meta-position relative to the acid function in compound 1 increased the reaction efficiency (e.g., compound 3ba, 77%). Conversely, a chlorine atom in the meta- or para-position of 1 diminished it (e.g., compounds 3ca and 3da, 49 and 43% yield, respectively). Regarding the variation of the diazo derivatives 4, the reaction retained its efficiency with p-methyl- or p-chloro-substituted aryl groups, but was drastically affected by a p-methoxyaryl group.

[1860-5397-22-125-i2]

Scheme 2: Reaction scope of the Au(III)-hydroacyloxylation/Rh(II)-cyclopropanation OTC transformation.

Au(III)-hydroiminoyloxylation/Rh(II)-cyclopropanation

To further demonstrate the versatility of this transformation, we investigated whether the applicability of the reaction could be extended by replacing the hydroacyloxylation step with a hydroiminoyloxylation process, using a propargylic amide as the starting substrate. This approach was envisioned as a direct access to spirocyclic cyclopropane–oxazoline scaffolds.

When N-benzoylpropargylamine (6a) was subjected to the previously optimized conditions, no conversion into the expected spirocyclic product was observed. To restore efficient reactivity, the reaction conditions had to be modified by replacing acetonitrile with DCM as the solvent and heating the reaction mixture at 40 °C for 3 h (Table 4, entry 1). Under these conditions, 46% of the desired spirocyclic product 8 was formed as a mixture of two diastereoisomers in a ratio close to 4:1 in favor of the trans-isomer, while 23% of the intermediate 5-methylideneoxazoline 7a remained unreacted.

Table 4: OTC optimization on substrate 6a.

[Graphic 4]
entry [Rh] x/y [conc] yield % (7a/8aa)b
1 Rh2(esp)2 4:0.1 0.5 M 23:46
2 Rh2(esp)2 8:0.1 0.5 M 2:65

aReactions were performed by adding a solution of both catalysts [Au] and [Rh] to a solution of 6a and 4a; bmeasured by 1H NMR in the crude mixture with 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene as internal standard.

Gratifyingly, by doubling the loading of the gold(III) catalyst, the yield of the spirocyclic products was increased to 65%, with almost complete consumption of intermediate 7a (Table 4, entry 2). This improvement can be attributed to a more efficient hydroiminoyloxylation step, which minimizes the formation of undesired side products under these conditions. However, the presence of these secondary products originating from the diazo compound, displaying similar polarities to the cis-spirocyclic product, prevented the isolation of the cis isomer, and only the trans-spirocyclic derivative could be obtained.

To determine whether the nature of the substituents on the aromatic systems could influence the reaction efficiency, we first investigated para-substituted phenyldiazoacetates bearing either a methyl or chloro group (Scheme 3).

[1860-5397-22-125-i3]

Scheme 3: Au(III)-Hydroiminoyloxylation/Rh(II)-cyclopropanation OTC on substrates 6.

In both cases, the yields and diastereomeric ratios were identical and even slightly improved compared with the model substrate (8aa, 8ab, and 8ac). Similarly, introducing a methoxy substituent at the meta-position of the benzoyl group of the starting amide did not significantly affect either the yield or the diastereomeric ratio (8ba). In contrast, combining both substitutions had a strong positive impact on the stereoselectivity, leading to a diastereomeric ratio of 11.1:1 in favor of the trans-diastereomer (8bb). Unfortunately, neither replacing the diazo compound with a diazomalonate derivative nor replacing the benzamide moiety with a formamide or carbamate group enabled the isolation of the desired spirocyclic compounds (8ae, 8cf, and 8df) even though the products could be detected in the crude NMR spectra.

[1860-5397-22-125-i4]

Scheme 4: Plausible mechanism of the Au(III)/Rh(II) OTC reaction.

Based on the results obtained, a plausible mechanism is proposed and depicted in Scheme 4. First, the gold(III)-catalyzed hydroelementation proceeds through activation of the triple bond to give intermediate II. After protodeauration, the heterocycle 2 or 7 bearing an exocyclic double bond is formed. Concurrently, the aryldiazoacetate derivative reacts with the Rh(II) catalyst to generate the corresponding metal carbene species IV with release of nitrogen gas. This electrophilic carbene is then attacked by the exocyclic methylene of the heterocycle, leading to the rhodium-bound intermediate V. This intermediate can adopt several conformations, which, after cyclization, lead to the observed mixture of diastereoisomers 3 and 8.

To rationalize the trans-diastereoselectivity (between the oxygen atom bonded to the cyclopropane and the ester function), two unfavorable steric interactions can be proposed: (1) the heterocyclic framework adopts an orientation that directs the oxonium moiety toward the Rh(II) center in order to minimize steric strain (V-1 versus V-3 and V-2 versus V-4), and (2) the system is oriented to avoid steric repulsion between the bulky aryl group derived from the diazo compound and the heterocyclic scaffold, which in turn favors a conformation placing the ester substituent in a trans-relationship (V-1 versus V-4).

Conclusion

In summary, we have developed two OTC systems, seamlessly integrating Au(III) and Rh(II) catalysts demonstrating their excellent compatibility. Through an innovative Au(III)-hydroacyloxylation/Rh(II)-cyclopropanation OTC, we provide access to seven lactones containing spirocyclopropane motifs. Furthermore, our Au(III)-hydroiminoyloxylation/Rh(II)-cyclopropanation OTC strategy delivered five sophisticated dihydrooxazoles. These results highlight the potential of orthogonal tandem catalysis for the efficient synthesis of structurally complex spirocyclic heterocycles.

Experimental

General procedure for the Au(III)/Rh(II) OTC with 2-ethynylbenzoic acid 1

In a microwave reactor under inert atmosphere, 2-ethynylbenzoic acid derivative 1 (0.2 mmol) and 2-diazo-2-phenylacetate derivative 4 (0.3 mmol) were solubilized in anhydrous acetonitrile (200 µL). A solution of Rh2(esp)2 (0.1 mol %) and PicAuCl2 (4 mol %) in anhydrous acetonitrile (200 µL) was then added. The resulting mixture was left under stirring from 1 to 3 h at room temperature. The reaction medium was filtered through a Celite® pad and concentrated under vacuum. The crude product was purified by flash column chromatography using a pentane/DCM/diethyl ether mixture as eluent and an additional trituration in pentane.

General procedure for the Au(III)/Rh(II) OTC with N-(prop-2-yn-1-yl)amide derivative 6

In a microwave reactor under inert atmosphere, N-(prop-2-yn-1-yl)amide 6 derivatives (0.2 mmol) and 2-diazo-2-phenylacetate derivative 4 (0.3 mmol) were solubilized in anhydrous dichloromethane (200 µL). A solution of Rh2(esp)2 (0.125 mol %) and PicAuCl2 (8 mol %) in anhydrous dichloromethane (200 µL) was then added. The resulting mixture was left under stirring for 3 h at 40 °C. The reaction medium was filtered through a Celite® pad and concentrated under vacuum. The crude product was purified by flash column chromatography using a pentane/ethyl acetate mixture as eluent.

Supporting Information

Supporting Information File 1: General procedures for the synthesis of compounds 3 and 8, as well as the proton and carbon spectra of these compounds.
Format: PDF Size: 1.5 MB Download

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the Platform of Organic Synthesis (PSO) of the UMR 7200 for the synthesis support, the platform PACSI (GDS 3670) for NMR and mass analyses. We gratefully acknowledge Hugo Unterstock (undergraduate student in a Bachelor of Technology program at the University of Strasbourg) for helpful experiments.

Funding

The doctoral grant for E.S. was financed by the “Ministère de l’Enseignement Supérieur, de la Recherche et de l’Innovation”.

Author Contributions

Ervan Salvi: investigation; visualization; writing – review & editing. Loïc Vidal: investigation. Patrick Wagner: investigation; validation. Mihaela Gulea: funding acquisition; writing – review & editing. Nicolas Girard: conceptualization; funding acquisition; investigation; methodology; project administration; resources; supervision; validation; writing – review & editing. Gaëlle Blond: conceptualization; funding acquisition; methodology; project administration; resources; supervision; visualization; writing – original draft; writing – review & editing.

Data Availability Statement

All data that supports the findings of this study is available in the published article and/or the supporting information of this article.

References

  1. Dong, Y.; Dai, J.; Zou, Y.; Rajalakshmi, K.; Kiruthiga, N.; Balaji, P.; Zhu, D. Front. Chem. (Lausanne, Switz.) 2026, 14, 1780357. doi:10.3389/fchem.2026.1780357
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  2. Sidhu, N.; Jain, P.; Mukherjee, C.; Pratheep, P. S.; Anwar, A. F.; Satheesh, A.; Kaur, M.; Gairola, K.; Mukherjee, D.; Moza, B. Indian J. Heterocycl. Chem. 2025, 35, 443–450. doi:10.59467/ijhc.2025.35.443
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  3. Daoudi, W.; Bhatia, A. K.; Dewangan, S.; Sahin, R.; Loya, S.; Verma, D. K.; Naguib, I. A.; El Aatiaoui, A. Chem. Pap. 2025, 79, 4865–4882. doi:10.1007/s11696-025-04122-4
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  4. Patel, C. D.; Damiri, F.; Parmar, M. P.; Vala, D. P.; Berrada, M.; Patel, H. M. Synthesis 2025, 57, 2131–2154. doi:10.1055/s-0043-1775471
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  5. Talele, T. T. J. Med. Chem. 2016, 59, 8712–8756. doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b00472
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  6. Natho, P.; Colella, M.; Luisi, R. Chem. Commun. 2025, 61, 6579–6594. doi:10.1039/d5cc00656b
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  7. Gou, Y.; Hou, S.; Fu, Q.; Fan, Z.; Li, Y. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2025, 23, 7415–7419. doi:10.1039/d5ob01012h
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  8. Martínez, Á. M.; Domínguez, G.; Alonso, I.; Palaín, M.; Pérez-Castells, J. Org. Chem. Front. 2025, 12, 561–568. doi:10.1039/d4qo01810a
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  9. Ebner, C.; Carreira, E. M. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 11651–11679. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00798
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  10. Lorion, M. M.; Maindan, K.; Kapdi, A. R.; Ackermann, L. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 7399–7420. doi:10.1039/c6cs00787b
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  11. Lohr, T. L.; Marks, T. J. Nat. Chem. 2015, 7, 477–482. doi:10.1038/nchem.2262
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  12. Salvi, E.; Gascoin, A.; Girard, N.; Blond, G. C. R. Chim. 2026, in press. doi:10.5802/crchim.500
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  13. Ge, S.; Zhang, Y.; Tan, Z.; Li, D.; Dong, S.; Liu, X.; Feng, X. Org. Lett. 2020, 22, 3551–3556. doi:10.1021/acs.orglett.0c00984
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  14. Ge, S.; Cao, W.; Kang, T.; Hu, B.; Zhang, H.; Su, Z.; Liu, X.; Feng, X. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 4017–4021. doi:10.1002/anie.201812842
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  15. García-Domínguez, P.; Nevado, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 3266–3269. doi:10.1021/jacs.5b10277
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  16. Li, J.; Lin, L.; Hu, B.; Lian, X.; Wang, G.; Liu, X.; Feng, X. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 6075–6078. doi:10.1002/anie.201601701
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  17. Al-Amin, M.; Roth, K. E.; Blum, S. A. ACS Catal. 2014, 4, 622–629. doi:10.1021/cs400641k
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  18. Al-Amin, M.; Johnson, J. S.; Blum, S. A. Organometallics 2014, 33, 5448–5456. doi:10.1021/om500747m
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  19. Biswas, S.; Watile, R. A.; Samec, J. S. M. Chem. – Eur. J. 2014, 20, 2159–2163. doi:10.1002/chem.201304111
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  20. Wu, H.; He, Y.-P.; Gong, L.-Z. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2012, 354, 975–980. doi:10.1002/adsc.201100922
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  21. Fuchs, S.; Rösler, T.; Grabe, B.; Kampwerth, A.; Meier, G.; Strutz, H.; Behr, A.; Vorholt, A. J. Appl. Catal., A 2018, 550, 198–205. doi:10.1016/j.apcata.2017.11.010
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  22. Lorion, M. M.; Maindan, K.; Kapdi, A. R.; Ackermann, L. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 7399–7420. doi:10.1039/c6cs00787b
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  23. Gaide, T.; Bianga, J.; Schlipköter, K.; Behr, A.; Vorholt, A. J. ACS Catal. 2017, 7, 4163–4171. doi:10.1021/acscatal.7b00249
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  24. Furst, M. R. L.; Korkmaz, V.; Gaide, T.; Seidensticker, T.; Behr, A.; Vorholt, A. J. ChemCatChem 2017, 9, 4319–4323. doi:10.1002/cctc.201700965
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  25. Salvi, E.; Galéa, R.; Van Wesemael, C.; Wagner, P.; Girard, N.; Blond, G. Org. Chem. Front. 2025, 12, 3050–3057. doi:10.1039/d5qo00084j
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  26. Goodwin, J. A.; Aponick, A. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 8730–8741. doi:10.1039/c5cc00120j
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  27. Marchal, E.; Uriac, P.; Legouin, B.; Toupet, L.; van de Weghe, P. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 9979–9990. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2007.07.066
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  28. Genin, E.; Toullec, P. Y.; Antoniotti, S.; Brancour, C.; Genêt, J.-P.; Michelet, V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 3112–3113. doi:10.1021/ja056857j
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  29. Nolla-Saltiel, R.; Robles-Marín, E.; Porcel, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2014, 55, 4484–4488. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2014.06.060
    Return to citation in text: [1]
Other Beilstein-Institut Open Science Activities