A heteroditopic macrocycle as organocatalytic nanoreactor for pyrroloacridinone synthesis in water

  1. Piyali Sarkar,
  2. Sayan Sarkar and
  3. Pradyut Ghosh

School of Chemical Sciences, Indian Association for the Cultivation of Science, 2A & 2B Raja S.C Mullick Road, Kolkata-700032, India

  1. Corresponding author email

This article is part of the thematic issue "Novel macrocycles – and old ones doing new tricks".

Guest Editor: W. Jiang
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2019, 15, 1505–1514. doi:10.3762/bjoc.15.152
Received 30 Mar 2019, Accepted 25 Jun 2019, Published 08 Jul 2019


A heteroditopic macrocycle is reported as an efficient organocatalytic nanoreactor for the synthesis of diversely functionalized pyrroloacridinones in aqueous medium. A library of compounds was synthesized in a one-step pathway utilizing 10 mol % of the nanoreactor following a sustainable methodology in water with high yields.

Keywords: heteroditopic macrocycle; organocatalyst; nanoreactor; pyrroloacridinones; sustainable chemistry; water


Acridines are a renowned heterocyclic entity not only for their biological activities but also for their fluorescence and chemiluminescence properties. Acridine dyes (e.g., acridine orange, acridine yellow, etc.), are predominantly used in staining of apoptotic cells, the investigation of the morphology of nuclei, the direct counting of cultivable bacteria, DNA intercalators, etc. [1-4]. Pyrrole, another biologically active heterocyclic compound, when fused with acridines affords promising bioactive pyrroloacridinone moieties demonstrating antitumor, antifungal, anthelmintic, anticancer activities, etc. [5-7]. Although a few syntheses of these molecules have been reported in the literature, these generally consist of multistep protocols and require harsh acidic catalysts [5,8-12]. Moreover, only in a very few cases, the environmentally benign solvent water has been used [11].

Organocatalytic nanoreactors have emerged as an exciting area for novel organic syntheses, offering environmentally friendlier processes [13-18]. The distinct nanospace around the substrates, use of green solvents and catalyst recycling, makes them highly valuable in view of sustainable chemical applications. Thus, the development of organocatalytic nanoreactors with new features is indeed important to address greener organic syntheses.

On the other hand, the rational design of heterotopic macrocycles has attracted intense interest as efficient organocatalysts due to their variable interacting sites. In this context, substituted calixarenes, cyclodextrins, etc., substances known for their ability to encapsulate organic guest molecules, have been explored as organocatalysts over the last two decades [19-24]. Another class of macrocycles with multiple functional groups has been employed as alternative templates to induce the organic environment for catalysis via multiple weak interactions viz. π–π stacking, hydrogen bonding, etc. [25-29]. At the same time, several efforts have been made to develop environmentally oriented efficient organocatalysts with prominence “on-water conditions” [30,31]. It is known that an important condition for an organic reaction in water is the aggregation of the reactants and the catalyst by hydrophobic forces. Further, the potential of hydrogen-bond donation may be a vital issue for the stabilization of the activated complex by a hydrophobic catalyst [31]. Again, the efficiency of an organocatalyst could be enhanced by downsizing the catalyst at nanorange distribution (i.e., nanoreactor) [13,14]. This is because a nanoreactor allows for precise interactions with the reactants. In fact, encapsulation can result in the stabilization of a specific transition state by stripping it out from solvent molecules [13,14]. Hence, in aqueous medium, the syntheses of nanoreactors with a covalent organic framework is important, which is indeed a difficult task due to their large aggregation tendency. Herein we have extensively explored a multifunctional macrocycle (BATA-MC), comprising bis-amide and tris-amine functionalities as H-bond donor/acceptor moieties, and parallel benzene moieties for aromatic π–π stacking interactions as an organocatalytic nanoreactor for organic transformations, in particular, for the synthesis of biologically important highly substituted pyrroloacridines in the ecofriendly solvent water.

Results and Discussion

Synthesis of the macrocycle

Considerable efforts in synthesizing multifunctional macrocycles have been dedicated lately for the construction of supramolecular assemblies like molecular rotors (pseudorotaxane, rotaxane, catenane), molecular switches, molecular shuttles, etc. [32-43]. Furthermore, macrocycles have been applied in the area of ion–ion pair recognition and heterometallic complex formation [44-50]. The multifunctional macrocycle BATA-MC (Figure 1) has been successfully applied as a wheel in the molecular rotors fields [51]. Considering its multiple binding sites (π-interactions, H-bonding site, cavity), we investigated the catalytic activity of this macrocycle. BATA-MC was synthesized following our previously reported procedure [51]. The synthesis involves three steps utilizing 1,3-diaminomethylbenzene, chloroacetyl chloride, 4-hydroxybenzaldehyde and diethylenetriamine as easily available starting materials. The desired product BATA-MC was isolated as white solid with 80–81% yield in the final step (Supporting Information File 1, Scheme S1).


Figure 1: Bis-amido-tris-amine macrocycle BATA-MC.

Preparation and properties of the nanoreactor

To prepare nanoranged particles of BATA-MC the synthesized macrocycle was suspended in water followed by ultrasonication for five minutes. Then, the dispersion of BATA-MC in water was subjected to various studies like SEM, TEM and DLS experiments. The DLS data revealed that the dispersed particles size in the aqueous phase varied from ≈60 nm to ≈105 nm (Figure 2a). Interestingly, when the same dispersion was used for the analysis of the particle size distribution on a solid surface, i.e., in SEM and TEM, the diameters were also found to be in the range of 70–100 nm (Figure 2b and 2c). So, these studies supported the nanoranged dispersion of the macrocycle, which indeed follows the basic characteristic of a nanoreactor.


Figure 2: (a) Number distribution plot with particle size in DLS, (b) SEM image and (c) TEM image showing the nanoranged particle distribution of the macrocycle.

Optimization of the reaction conditions for the synthesis of pyrroloacridinones

The organocatalytic activity of the BATA-MC nanoreactor was then explored in the synthesis of pyrroloacridines. To optimize the reaction conditions, we chose the synthesis of 4a as the model reaction. Thus, we performed the reaction of isatin (1a, 1 mmol), 5,5-dimethylcyclohexane-1,3-dione (2, 1 mmol) and p-toluidine (3a, 1 mmol) in water under different conditions (Table 1). Importantly, the catalyst BATA-MC showed excellent efficacy affording the desired product 4a in high yields in aqueous medium (Table 1, entries 2–7). To examine the effect of organic solvent, we employed a 1:1 mixture of ethanol/water, which revealed a marginal increase in the yields (Table 1, entries 8–10). However, despite the slightly lower yield, we selected water as an environmentally benign solvent. Temperature also played a vital role on the formation of the product. No product was detected at room temperature (rt), however, the yields gradually increased with increasing temperatures up to 100 °C (Table 1, entries 1–5).

Table 1: Effect of various reaction parameters.a

[Graphic 1]
Entry Catalyst Solvent Temp. (°C) Time, h Yieldb (%)
1 BATA-MC H2O rtc 72 NF
2 BATA-MC H2O 80 24 70
3 BATA-MC H2O 80 48 72
4 BATA-MC H2O 100 6 78
5 BATA-MC H2O 100 8 88
6 BATA-MC H2O 100 12 89
7 BATA-MC H2O 100 24 89
8 BATA-MC EtOH/H2O 1:1 80 8 85
9 BATA-MC EtOH/H2O 1:1 90 8 91
10 BATA-MC EtOH/H2O 1:1 90 12 92
11 H2O 100 48 NF
12 EtOH/H2O 1:1 90 48 trace
13 PEG/H2O 1:4 100 48 12
14 PEG/H2O 1:3 100 48 16

aReaction conditions: a mixture of 1.0 equiv of each of dimedone (1 mmol), isatin (1 mmol), and p-toluidine (1 mmol) was heated with stirring in the presence of the catalyst (10 mol %) in 3 mL of solvent. bIsolated yield. NF= not found.

To investigate the effectiveness of BATA-MC, the reaction was carried out in absence of the catalyst. The product 4a did not form in water even at 100 °C (Table 1, entry 11). Only a trace amount of the product was detected when the reaction was carried out in ethanol/water 1:1 (Table 1, entry 12). Even when repeating the reaction in the presence of the phase-transfer catalyst, poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) no mentionable yield of product was observed (Table 1, entries 13 and 14).

The subsequent screening of the kinetics of the reaction for the optimum time is shown in Figure 3. The best result was obtained at approximate 8 h and longer reaction times (up to 18 h), maintaining all reaction conditions unchanged, did not improve the yield. Thus, we converge that the BATA-MC as a nanoreactor provides excellent results (88% yield) at 100 °C over 8 h in aqueous medium (Table 1, entry 5).


Figure 3: Dependence of the yield of compound 4a on the reaction time using BATA-MC.

Catalyst loading

To identify the optimum amount of the catalyst, the synthesis of 4a was inspected with different amounts of BATA-MC in H2O at 100 °C. A consistent increase in the yield of 4a is observed with increasing the amount of the catalyst up to 10 mol % (Figure 4). Higher catalyst concentrations had no beneficial effect on the product yield. So, we selected 10 mol % BATA-MC loading as the minimum effective amount for further reactions.


Figure 4: Yields of product 4a at different catalyst loading.

Substrate scope

Synthesis of 4,5-dihydropyrrolo[2,3,4-kl]acridinones

After acquiring the optimized reaction conditions, we next turned our attention to the reaction scope. A series of investigations was performed to prepare various types of pyrroloacridines (Scheme 1). We first scrutinized a variety of anilines having different types of electron-donating or electron-withdrawing groups which showed good to excellent yields (74–91%) of the expected products 4aj. The presence of electron-donating groups showed the best results and electron-withdrawing groups resulted in slightly lower yields.


Scheme 1: BATA-MC-catalyzed synthesis of 4,5-dihydropyrrolo[2,3,4-kl]acridinones.

Of note, aliphatic amines showed outstanding results affording 4,5-dihydropyrrolo[2,3,4-kl]acridinones 4k,l in high yields. Also good yields (83–86%) of products 4mp were obtained when various substituted isatins with electron-withdrawing as well as electron-donating groups were engaged in this transformation.

Synthesis of pyrrolo[2,3,4-kl]acridinones

After the successful synthesis of the 4,5-dihydropyrrolo derivatives, we were interested to synthesize fully aromatic products by using C5–H containing cyclohexane-1,3-dione derivatives in place of dimedone. Thus, using cyclohexane-1,3-dione (5) or 5-phenylcyclohexane-1,3-dione (6) allowed the isolation of novel substituted pyrrolo[2,3,4-kl]acridinones in high yields and illustrated the adaptability of this protocol (Scheme 2). Thus, under the above optimized conditions, the corresponding fully oxidized products were obtained through aerial oxidation or dehydrogenation of 4,5-dihydropyrrolo[2,3,4-kl]acridinones driven by aromatic stabilization. Consequently, the presented BATA-MC-catalyzed protocol demonstrates a general applicability furnishing a variety of multisubstituted acridines.


Scheme 2: BATA-MC-catalyzed synthesis of pyrrolo[2,3,4-kl]acridinone derivatives.

Confirmation of structures

All products (4,5-dihydropyrrolo[2,3,4-kl]acridinones 4ap and pyrrolo[2,3,4-kl]acridinones 7ac) were characterized by using different spectroscopic techniques, 1H NMR, 13C NMR, IR and HRMS. In addition, one of the compounds, 4d, was also examined by single crystal X-ray structure analysis (Figure 5).


Figure 5: X-ray single crystal structure of 4d (CCDC 1898008).

Mechanistic pathway

A probable mechanism is portrayed in Scheme 3 including the role of the BATA-MC nanoreactor. The nanoreactor is a molecular assembly of BATA-MC single molecules which may provide a suitable organic environment to the starting materials by π-interaction and H-bonding, and inevitably orients them into the necessary reactive positions.


Scheme 3: Probable mechanism illustrated for the synthesis of 4a using BATA-MC. For the sake of simplicity, we denoted BATA-MC as the cycle in some steps.

To represent the simple catalytic activity, we have chosen a part of the nanoreactor which is a single molecule as catalyst in the earliest steps of the mechanistic pathway (Figure 6).


Figure 6: Representation of BATA-MC nanoreactor.

This multicomponent reaction is expected to comprise a series of condensations and subsequent ring-closure cascade reactions (Scheme 3). To demonstrate the mechanistic pathway, dimedone (2), isatin (1a) and p-toluidine (3a) were selected as model substrates. Firstly, dimedone and p-toluidine form enaminoketone A through a condensation reaction and BATA-MC provides the environment for this condensation in water. To investigate this primary step, a control experiment was performed. One aliquot was taken from the reaction mixture after 10 minutes and analyzed by ESIMS. The observed peak at m/z 801.4 corresponding to [BATA-MC + 2 + 3a + Na]+ confirmed the involvement of BATA-MC as nanoreactor (Supporting Information File 1, Figure S1). When we investigated the interaction of isatin with BATA-MC, we observed an ESIMS peak at m/z 679.32 corresponding to [BATA-MC + 1a + H]+ (Supporting Information File 1, Figure S2) which supported the association of the macrocycle with isatin. Hence, further condensation between enaminoketone and isatin provides the intermediate B. The isatin moiety also has π-stacking sites along with H-bonding donor/acceptor site. So, it may also be associated to the nanoreactor to approach the enaminoketone. Then, consecutive cyclization and ring opening of isatin (translactamization) affords intermediate C which undergoes cyclocondensation to furnish the final product F.

Recyclability of the BATA-MC catalyst

The BATA-MC catalyst was recovered by column chromatography and its recyclability was investigated in the synthesis of 4a to demonstrate the eco-friendly nature of the catalyst. The catalytic activity remained nearly unchanged up to five cycles as shown in Figure 7. Therefore, BATA-MC has the prospective of reworking at least five times. SEM and TEM images of the catalyst’s nanoranged dispersive particles after five cycles are given in Supporting Information File 1 (Figure S4) which confirm the range of particle sizes of 70–110 nm even after five cycles.


Figure 7: The reusability of the nanoreactor for the synthesis of 4a.


In summary, a multifunctional heteroditopic macrocycle is established as an efficient nanoreactor for organic transformations in water. Using this macrocycle, a library of biologically interesting highly substituted pyrroloacridines has been synthesized with high yields from easily available starting materials in water within 8 h. Following this green methodology, we successfully synthesized 4,5-dihydropyrroloacridinones and fully aromatized pyrrolo analogues in the eco-friendly solvent water with BATA-MC as a recyclable catalyst. Moreover, some of the synthesized acridines may find medicinal applications in future.


General procedure for the synthesis of pyrrolo[2,3,4-kl]acridinone derivatives

First 53.1 mg (10 mol %) of BATA-MC was dissolved in 3 mL of H2O by ultrasonication for five minutes. Then, 5,5-dimethylcyclohexane-1,3-dione (140 mg, 1 mmol), aromatic or aliphatic amine (1 mmol) and isatin (147 mg, 1 mmol) were added to the solution. The reaction mixture was refluxed at 100 °C with stirring for 8 h. The progress of the reaction was monitored by TLC. After completion of the reaction, the organic part was extracted with chloroform and then subjected to column chromatography using 60–120 mesh silica gel and petroleum ether/ethyl acetate mixture as eluent. We got pure products at 3–4% ethyl acetate in petroleum ether and the pure catalyst using 5% methanol in dichloromethane.

Supporting Information

Supporting Information File 1: Analytical data and copies of 1H, 13C NMR and MS spectra.
Format: PDF Size: 3.3 MB Download


P. Sarkar thanks the SERB project PDF/2016/001529 for funding. S. Sarkar thanks the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), New Delhi, for his fellowship (SRF). The authors also thank IACS for the Instrumentation Facility.


  1. Das, A.; Harshadha, K.; Dhinesh Kannan, S. K.; Hari Raj, K.; Jayaprakash, B. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2018, 19, 1977–1985. doi:10.22034/apjcp.2018.19.7.1977
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  2. Unnikrishnana, N. T.; Raghavana, K. T. Int. J. Pharm. Biol. Sci. 2018, 8, 475–485.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  3. Sultana, M.; Nusrin, S.; Hasan, N. A.; Sadique, A.; Ahmed, K. U.; Islam, A.; Hossain, A.; Longini, I.; Nizam, A.; Huq, A.; Siddique, A. K.; Sack, D. A.; Sack, R. B.; Colwell, R. R.; Alam, M. mBio 2018, 9, e00483–18. doi:10.1128/mbio.00483-18
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  4. Kabiri, Y.; Angelin, A.; Ahmed, I.; Mutlu, H.; Bauer, J.; Niemeyer, C. M.; Zandbergen, H.; Dekker, C. ChemBioChem 2019, 20, 822–830. doi:10.1002/cbic.201800638
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  5. Dandia, A.; Sharma, A.; Parewa, V.; Kumawat, B.; Rathore, K. S.; Sharma, A. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 91888–91902. doi:10.1039/c5ra11747j
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  6. Kefayati, H.; Narchin, F.; Rad-Moghadam, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2012, 53, 4573–4575. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2012.06.070
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  7. Hu, M.-H.; Lin, W.; Cao, C.-P.; Huang, Z.-B.; Shi, D.-Q. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 2014, 51 (Suppl. 1), E227–E233. doi:10.1002/jhet.2023
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  8. Wang, H.; Li, L.; Lin, W.; Xu, P.; Huang, Z.; Shi, D. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 4598–4601. doi:10.1021/ol302058g
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  9. Hao, W.-J.; Wang, J.-Q.; Xu, X.-P.; Zhang, S.-L.; Wang, S.-Y.; Ji, S.-J. J. Org. Chem. 2013, 78, 12362–12373. doi:10.1021/jo401773j
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  10. Sharma, V.; Sharma, P. C.; Kumar, V. J. Adv. Res. 2015, 6, 63–71. doi:10.1016/j.jare.2014.11.002
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  11. Li, C.; Zhang, F. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 75359–75364. doi:10.1039/c6ra18048e
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  12. Karimi-Jaberi, Z.; Jaafarizadeh, A. Res. Chem. Intermed. 2015, 41, 4913–4918. doi:10.1007/s11164-014-1576-y
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  13. Salpage, S. R.; Xu, Y.; Som, B.; Sindt, A. J.; Smith, M. D.; Shimizu, L. S. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 98350–98355. doi:10.1039/c6ra18681e
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  14. Dawn, S.; Salpage, S. R.; Koscher, B. A.; Bick, A.; Wibowo, A. C.; Pellechia, P. J.; Shimizu, L. S. J. Phys. Chem. A 2014, 118, 10563–10574. doi:10.1021/jp505304n
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  15. Taylor, R. W.; Coulston, R. J.; Biedermann, F.; Mahajan, S.; Baumberg, J. J.; Scherman, O. A. Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 5985–5990. doi:10.1021/nl403164c
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  16. Salavati-Niasari, M. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2009, 12, 359–363. doi:10.1016/j.inoche.2009.02.009
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  17. Sarkar, P.; Mukhopadhyay, C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2016, 57, 4306–4310. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2016.08.037
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  18. Sarkar, P.; Mukhopadhyay, C. Green Chem. 2016, 18, 442–451. doi:10.1039/c5gc01859e
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  19. Sarkar, P.; Mukhopadhyay, C. Green Chem. 2015, 17, 3452–3465. doi:10.1039/c5gc00156k
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  20. Sarkar, P.; Mukhopadhyay, C. Green Chem. 2016, 18, 6556–6563. doi:10.1039/c6gc02144a
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  21. Sarkar, P.; Maiti, S.; Ghosh, K.; Sengupta (Bandyopadhyay), S.; Butcher, R. J.; Mukhopadhyay, C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2014, 55, 996–1001. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2013.12.068
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  22. De Rosa, M.; La Manna, P.; Talotta, C.; Soriente, A.; Gaeta, C.; Neri, P. Front. Chem. (Lausanne, Switz.) 2018, 6, No. 84. doi:10.3389/fchem.2018.00084
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  23. Li, K.; Wu, X.; Gu, Q.; Zhao, X.; Yuan, M.; Ma, W.; Ni, W.; Hou, Z. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 14721–14732. doi:10.1039/c7ra00416h
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  24. Tayade, Y. A.; Patil, D. R.; Wagh, Y. B.; Jangle, A. D.; Dalal, D. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2015, 56, 666–673. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2014.12.012
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  25. Ema, T.; Yokoyama, M.; Watanabe, S.; Sasaki, S.; Ota, H.; Takaishi, K. Org. Lett. 2017, 19, 4070–4073. doi:10.1021/acs.orglett.7b01838
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  26. Sarkar, S.; Sarkar, P.; Ghosh, P. Org. Lett. 2018, 20, 6725–6729. doi:10.1021/acs.orglett.8b02829
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  27. Kang, K.; Lohrman, J. A.; Nagarajan, S.; Chen, L.; Deng, P.; Shen, X.; Fu, K.; Feng, W.; Johnson, D. W.; Yuan, L. Org. Lett. 2019, 21, 652–655. doi:10.1021/acs.orglett.8b03778
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  28. Zhao, H.; Shen, J.; Guo, J.; Ye, R.; Zeng, H. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 2323–2325. doi:10.1039/c3cc00019b
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  29. Roucan, M.; Kielmann, M.; Connon, S. J.; Bernhard, S. S. R.; Senge, M. O. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 26–29. doi:10.1039/c7cc08099a
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  30. De Rosa, M.; La Manna, P.; Soriente, A.; Gaeta, C.; Talotta, C.; Neri, P. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 91846–91851. doi:10.1039/c6ra19270j
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  31. Klijn, J. E.; Engberts, J. B. F. N. Nature 2005, 435, 746–747. doi:10.1038/435746a
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  32. Leigh, D. A.; Lemonnier, J.-F.; Woltering, S. L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 12212–12214. doi:10.1002/anie.201804904
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  33. Saha, S.; Santra, S.; Ghosh, P. Org. Lett. 2015, 17, 1854–1857. doi:10.1021/acs.orglett.5b00470
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  34. Traulsen, N. L.; Traulsen, C. H.-H.; Deutinger, P. M.; Müller, S.; Schmidt, D.; Linder, I.; Schalley, C. A. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2015, 13, 10881–10887. doi:10.1039/c5ob01687h
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  35. Cort, A. D.; Mandolini, L.; Pasquini, C.; Schiaffino, L. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2006, 4, 4543–4546. doi:10.1039/b613705a
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  36. Bej, S.; Ghosh, P. Dalton Trans. 2018, 47, 13408–13418. doi:10.1039/c8dt02848f
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  37. Nandi, M.; Bej, S.; Ghosh, T. K.; Ghosh, P. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 3085–3088. doi:10.1039/c9cc00090a
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  38. Steemers, L.; Wanner, M. J.; Lutz, M.; Hiemstra, H.; van Maarseveen, J. H. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 15392. doi:10.1038/ncomms15392
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  39. Fielden, S. D. P.; Leigh, D. A.; McTernan, C. T.; Pérez-Saavedra, B.; Vitorica-Yrezabal, I. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 6049–6052. doi:10.1021/jacs.8b03394
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  40. Ito, K.; Mutoh, Y.; Saito, S. J. Org. Chem. 2017, 82, 6118–6124. doi:10.1021/acs.joc.7b00672
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  41. Cheng, C.; Stoddart, J. F. ChemPhysChem 2016, 17, 1780–1793. doi:10.1002/cphc.201501155
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  42. Cao, Z.-Q.; Miao, Q.; Zhang, Q.; Li, H.; Qu, D.-H.; Tian, H. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 4973–4976. doi:10.1039/c4cc09976a
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  43. Schröder, H. V.; Schalley, C. A. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2018, 14, 2163–2185. doi:10.3762/bjoc.14.190
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  44. Bassetti, M.; Calenne, A.; Mastrofrancesco, L.; Salamone, M.; Bocelli, G.; Cantoni, A.; Musatti, A. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2006, 914–925. doi:10.1002/ejic.200500703
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  45. Jin, C.-C.; Cong, H.; Ni, X.-L.; Zeng, X.; Redshaw, C.; Yamato, T. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 31469–31475. doi:10.1039/c4ra04566a
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  46. Picot, S. C.; Mullaney, B. R.; Beer, P. D. Chem. – Eur. J. 2012, 18, 6230–6237. doi:10.1002/chem.201200251
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  47. Kirkovits, G. J.; Shriver, J. A.; Gale, P. A.; Sessler, J. L. J. Inclusion Phenom. Macrocyclic Chem. 2001, 41, 69–75. doi:10.1023/a:1014468126351
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  48. Kim, S. K.; Sessler, J. L. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 3784–3809. doi:10.1039/c002694h
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  49. Knighton, R. C.; Beer, P. D. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 1540–1542. doi:10.1039/c3cc48905a
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  50. Lee, E.; Park, K.-M.; Ikeda, M.; Kuwahara, S.; Habata, Y.; Lee, S. S. Inorg. Chem. 2015, 54, 5372–5383. doi:10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5b00422
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  51. Saha, S.; Ravikumar, I.; Ghosh, P. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 6272–6274. doi:10.1039/c1cc10472a
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]

© 2019 Sarkar et al.; licensee Beilstein-Institut.
This is an Open Access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0). Please note that the reuse, redistribution and reproduction in particular requires that the authors and source are credited.
The license is subject to the Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry terms and conditions: (https://www.beilstein-journals.org/bjoc)

Back to Article List